Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released - page 38. (Read 1356140 times)
November 06, 2016, 03:53:01 AM
Please vote for VeriCoin on https://revex.co/
November 04, 2016, 08:46:49 PM
having some issues with the wallet again, apr jumped way up to 42%...file menu-> reload blockchain
I have reloaded the chain twice and it loads the wrong balance into my wallet, about half of my coins are not showing up.
When I try to scan the wallet I get an error.....
Withdrawals disabled on Poloniex
November 04, 2016, 06:19:30 PM
having some issues with the wallet again, apr jumped way up to 42%...file menu-> reload blockchain
I have reloaded the chain twice and it loads the wrong balance into my wallet, about half of my coins are not showing up.
When I try to scan the wallet I get an error.....
November 04, 2016, 03:44:18 PM
having some issues with the wallet again, apr jumped way up to 42%...file menu-> reload blockchain
I have reloaded the chain twice and it loads the wrong balance into my wallet, about half of my coins are not showing up.
When I try to scan the wallet I get an error.....
November 04, 2016, 02:52:17 PM
Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?
Never mind, I get it now, should have just read the post!
With so many threads to keep up with, sometimes I just get lazy. Have to work on that...
November 04, 2016, 11:08:47 AM
Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?
Never mind, I get it now, should have just read the post!
November 04, 2016, 10:35:59 AM
Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?
Never mind, I get it now, should have just read the post!
November 04, 2016, 10:02:13 AM
$ value is what matters, not the satoshi price.
not everyone will agree with you on that.
November 04, 2016, 09:58:41 AM
$ value is what matters, not the satoshi price.
it would seem that not everyone agrees with you on that.
but the network has to work and be trusted first if you want any value fiat or satoshi.
both of those things are debatable at this time.
November 04, 2016, 09:18:30 AM
quickly devalued coin
$ value is what matters, not the satoshi price. November 04, 2016, 01:06:16 AM
quickly devalued coin
November 04, 2016, 12:59:11 AM
Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Woah, that was a good read post there on SteemIt. That's all going to pay off one day. Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
November 03, 2016, 09:18:07 PM
Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
How will this change effect the real world generation of coins using the staking wallet?
November 03, 2016, 04:46:01 PM
Quoting this again for visibility since it was the last post on the previous page.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
If you have some spare time and own a steemit account, give this post some love! https://steemit.com/verium/@birty/cpu-mining-is-back-a-complete-how-to-guide-and-profit-analysis-for-verium-mining-on-a-farm-of-single-board-computers-part-1
November 03, 2016, 02:52:48 PM
Hey Guys,
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
Update on network condition:
So it turns out the VeriFund now has most of the coins of many previous stakers. Because of this we had to change the parameters for the VeriFund staking to accommodate so many stakes going through us and still properly distributing the consensus in the network over time. It turns out the parameters we had while they worked well for the old network dynamic, they don't work great for the new dynamic where many former stakers coins, we are staking. We now have the verifund with the right parameters to continuously stake while maintaining a fair share of the consensus. After some testing with these parameters we will release a new wallet generally that has these same parameters. They are a new more general purpose set of parameters that don't depend on certain network conditions like we had in the past. Since the network consensus dynamic changed post ICO this issue presented itself. It seems we have it all ironed out now and will continue to test these new more general stake parameters. So if all goes well we won't see the kind of network issue like this again. Also the parameters being too specific to the old network dynamic was a bit of a surprise to us which is why we had issues with the last update and why it's taken a little time to get the new more generally applicable parameters ironed out.
November 03, 2016, 09:56:33 AM
parameters.... eh?
lel
Yes parameters. What do you want to know? lel
November 03, 2016, 09:55:35 AM
Make sure you are on the right block, getting some nice interest payouts.
Client should be on same block as chainz. Check that here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/vrc/# or in the wallet.
If you are having problems getting synced / getting on the right block do the following -
Use File > Reload Blockchain if out of sync. Bootstrap just got updated.
Client should be on same block as chainz. Check that here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/vrc/# or in the wallet.
If you are having problems getting synced / getting on the right block do the following -
Use File > Reload Blockchain if out of sync. Bootstrap just got updated.
November 03, 2016, 09:54:54 AM
parameters.... eh?
lel
burn it all.
everything that has been staked since you acquired your slush fund... burn it.
then try again.
lel
burn it all.
everything that has been staked since you acquired your slush fund... burn it.
then try again.
November 03, 2016, 09:22:25 AM
very nice coin..
Only mintpal hacking issue make this hard..
I hope to see this coin to go far more great from here..
Only mintpal hacking issue make this hard..
I hope to see this coin to go far more great from here..
November 03, 2016, 09:08:20 AM
redownload and rescan(
not sync(
not sync(
Jump to: