Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released - page 589. (Read 1356163 times)

500 VRC will be awarded to listeners during the Open Beta Launch of VRCRadio Tommorow

http://www.vrcradio.com/

Triva, Dedications, Fun, Crpto chat

 VRCRadio is targeting newbies and the GP

                BUT

ALL R Welcome

HELLO ALL:

Did you miss out on the 1 oz .999 Fine Silver Physical Vericoin pre-sale? Are you wanting to help spread the word about Vericoin but don't know how?

GOOD NEWS!

Lotto Tickets for the last available Physical Vericoin are on sale NOW as well as Vericoin Logo Stickers!!!!

Prices are:
25 VRC per Lotto ticket, you can buy as many as you want but only 2000 are available!

15 VRC per Logo Sticker, you can buy as many as you want but only 850 are available!

Here is a picture of the Stickers with a US Quarter for size comparison, They are rated Weatherproof and durability is rated at 5 years outdoor use, so these things are VERI durable.




PM ME if you want to buy any!

No we don't! Get out all the pumpers and dumpers It seems like way to many people here are looking for news everyday!

Though I am sure there will be news, a developer said by end of week they are looking to get out the android wallet and or the fiat in wallet. Hopefully both, but as many know, they have to get the payment processors coding for the wallet which is the current hold up.

volume is dying and this is not a good sign. we need another pump

I think the devs approach to public inclusion is what will bring change. Mainstream public will not be too concerned about "coding" in order to jump into noob experimental investment. They may become more defined after they get a better idea of things, and by then things will have become more optimized anyhow.

I don't really think much of the past focus of "anonymity" that mostly pandered to conspiracy theorists. You know it is conspiracy based when the majority of devs hide behind proxies and nicknames. Creating a mainstream portal will bring change, then offering the options to go anon will still be an option to those with that preference.

As far as I can tell the devs have created a doorway that will be profitable to everyone, most likely even the whole list of altcoins.

I agree with you that on the announcing projects thing. I think that it catered to the pumpers and then some of the investors that got pulled in along the way are now being hurt, as well as the day traders who didn't get out quick enough, they had a bad couple weeks.

But please, I will never agree with you that the lady has a ounce of decency. Never selfless, always self promoting. Never once do they go and compliment anything that does not benefit themselves. They where given a gift from the devs for stating the obvious and the lady spit in the communities face, and then threatened, and attacked the developers.

If you read the posts you can see the true intention beam through. Attack any coin unrelated to what they invest in. And right there she lies about being invested in other coins. Because they would be out pumping them to. They only pump 1 coin, with 1 affiliation to the BC marketplace that person is developing.

Every other post is trashing a coin, from XC, to this one and many others before. Anything that is competing for her business in her eyes she goes on the offensive. I am developing a business to, I see it in many coins I cover, this same person with the same tactic. I actually have to avoid doing business with BC properties because I fear i'm already starting to dislike the whole community because of this one persons actions.

I dont care what his post history is. All im saying is that what he said is the truth in crypto. Especially that everyone is out about to protect their investments, whether its a scam or not. Not many cares about the fundamentals, the code, nor if the coin will succeed long term. All they care about is making a quick buck.

To be fair, I don't think yourstruly has ever implied that they respect VRC, but just because you don't like the tone of the posts they make, doesn't mean to say the content should be entirely ignored.

Going by their post history, one thing struck me as extremely pertinent, that dev teams should not be announcing project milestone due dates because, as we have all seen repeatedly, these are used by market speculators to push the price all over the place and whenever issues arise that might push back the release of an expected feature, we have people screaming FUD about how the whole project is falling apart.

Coin projects should discuss short, medium and long-term development plans and leave it at that. It'll make it so much harder for the speculators to screw with the price and, hopefully, would result in far less meme-filled threads going spastic with 'moon' and 'dump it' vapid nonsense.

She not he. Also I'm invested in a lot of cryptocurrency as I plan to run an exchange and like to hedge my bets. Even if I wasn't it wouldn't make my points any less valid.

I do specifically like BC because the developer Pavel is one of the few pushing fixes in PoS protocol and not just making a wallet. To be very clear: cryptocurrency is the underlying protocol not the GUI wallet you see, confusing the two is really hurting the continued developement of cryptocurrency and dividing the community across unnecessary blockchain forks.  

How many PoS coin dev teams are truly working towards a solution for the centralized checkpoint problem? Do you even realize that this problem even exist? Were you aware of it before I mentioned it?

I work on coin neutral open source projects, which pretty much trumps all your stupid points. You can see the code, you can see I have been working on them for a long time if you review my post history far enough.

 

Smoke and mirrors dude. Look at his post history.

The community to him revolves around investing in BC, He is making a website and has direct benefit from seeing people join his coin. He can only make so much money if its not the dominant currency.

All you need to do is look at his post history. If its not BC, he goes and bashes it as an ambassador of the community.


yourstrully is a wolf in sheep's clothing. He would be happy if VRC didn't exist. For you to say anything he does is at the benefit of the VRC community is a lie. He would be happier to see us fail, than succeed. This is why he conducts business the way he does.

Don't be fooled.

I stay away from BC board, even though I pop into a lot of random boards to support coins. If I see his stupid posts I am scared how I would represent the VRC community because I respect you people. He has no respect for his community, or ours.

nice to see all getting along so well almost feels like xmas 

^^^^Epic post, and I'm a VRC investor and believe in the team. Wells said, yourtruly.

Oh, BCBit server background jobs were not running for the first day but I fixed the issue once I was notified. It wasn't an issue of concurrency or anything else.

You were not rate limiting before, because you were generating new VRC addresses for each API hit. Which after a while your keypool runs out, then each request starts becoming an issue as you have to refill the keypool.

I wasn't polite because the VRC community insisting I was spreading lies when I obviously found several problems with your service. The reason they were doing this is because they don't care about good code or advancing crypto, they care about their investment.

I also don't really respect seeing simplified centralized exchange services built into a wallet touted as revolutionary advances to cryptocurrencies. I legitimately think think you are developing a custom wallet and not a cryptocurrency and your work so far did does not justify a blockchain fork. Your time would have been better spent making coin neutral centralized services for several coins. Your ideas are not bad but at the same time pretending they are revolutionary is absurd considering the foundation work is open, decentralized and has literally changed the way people think about money.

I also see no reason to discuss the issues in private because you should be developing in the open, just like how 99% (Bitcoin) of the code used for VRC was developed. Also at anytime you could have messaged me directly  and asked about what I found but instead you sidestepped the issues I found and pretended you could autoblock IP addresses spamming your API (which at the time was not happening). I felt I held back since I didn't realize the other scripts I wrote to DOS your service and stopped after I realized it worked. There are other issues too I found but I haven't since tested them. 

While everyone here is obsessed with short term profits on their own investments I'm actually concerned about the continued development of cryptocurrencies as a whole which is why I bothered to tell you about the issues in your code and even provided examples in the first place. You can see that in the work I do too.

I meant multiple users can't concurrently use BCBit, at least the first few days of deployment. We had ratelimiting but no error messaging early on. You could process the trades but they wouldn't send out BTC for more than 1 tx at a time.

Thanks for the ruby wallet info. I'll pass that onto those that want to develop for VRC.

Nobody successfully exploited VeriBit. You did make us anxious with our long window which we changed (hence your bounty). But you were in no way polite with further follow up and didn't privately discuss with us any issues you saw.

Anyway, thanks for the open source contributions to the coin community. That's sincerely appreciated.

Crypto Analytics reiterates its BUY rating on VRC

Findings and Target Price
http://cryptoanalytics.trade
http://cryptoanalytics.trade/vrc/

VRC LOGO STICKERS AND PHYSICAL COIN LOTTO TICKETS ARE NOW ON SALE!!!!!

Stickers = 15 VRC / per, no limit (only 850 available)

Physical Vericoin Lotto tickets = 25 VRC / per, no limit (only 2000 available, so chances of winning are 1:2000)

+1000

I love it

You have to admit I pointed it out back when I showed my last example code. If you want to talk about more improvements like I said feel free to PM me.

Your API respone implies otherwise, when initiating a second/concurrent trade.
{"error":"There has been an error, You are attempting to send again too soon after opening other transactions.  Either send along VRC or wait until the previous transaction expires."}

It still will be open source, I have just been really busy, haha seriously sorry about that - but been bogged down with my other project and family.

On a related note, I massively updated the open source ruby library https://github.com/ruby-wallet/ruby-wallet which BcBit was built on, which is freely available (also coin neutral so works for any coind based on bitcoin meaning VRC too). Once I have more time to update this library some more I should be able to get the concurrent sending working without opening up to a DOS attack too.

You will be able to find BCBit here after I make the application settings example files and prepare it for open sourcing: https://github.com/blackwavelabs

Can send bounty here:
VSRU4HRgtqHifQaXN3QkQrdTRHdWLwUGZj