Quite similar. With FX8350 I get like ~330Kh/s with wallet, and around 410Kh/s with minerd.
I lol'd
Anyways, bounties really DO seem strangely big compared to what we mined. 25 blocks so far, kinda funny, even compared to a simple node bounty!
Topic: [ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal - page 55. (Read 118096 times)
July 21, 2014, 09:25:38 AM
I lol'd
Anyways, bounties really DO seem strangely big compared to what we mined. 25 blocks so far, kinda funny, even compared to a simple node bounty!
July 21, 2014, 09:19:21 AM
0.5%, or 3.4 Million WHRL will be premined to support these bounties and others in the future.
200,000 WHRL: For GPU Miner
50,000 WHRL: For Increasing CPU Miner Performance
400,000 WHRL: For Implementing WhirlPool Anonymous System
200,000 WHRL: For Android Wallet
100,000 WHRL: For Online Wallet
50,000 WHRL: For Paper Wallet Generator
50,000 WHRL: For Block Explorer
WTF and I have like 300 from beginning with 3* I7
DEV you did somthing wrong!
200,000 WHRL: For GPU Miner
50,000 WHRL: For Increasing CPU Miner Performance
400,000 WHRL: For Implementing WhirlPool Anonymous System
200,000 WHRL: For Android Wallet
100,000 WHRL: For Online Wallet
50,000 WHRL: For Paper Wallet Generator
50,000 WHRL: For Block Explorer
WTF and I have like 300 from beginning with 3* I7
DEV you did somthing wrong! 
July 21, 2014, 09:18:31 AM
nodes ?
addnode=162.253.154.172addnode=162.248.4.167
addnode=183.21.162.89
addnode=92.244.112.153
addnode=107.150.46.123
addnode=90.155.222.162
addnode=151.48.154.149
addnode=66.69.8.121
July 21, 2014, 09:17:51 AM
Quite similar. With FX8350 I get like ~330Kh/s with wallet, and around 410Kh/s with minerd.
July 21, 2014, 09:14:05 AM
Quite similar. With FX8350 I get like ~330Kh/s with wallet, and around 410Kh/s with minerd.
July 21, 2014, 09:11:36 AM
nodes ?
All on sample config in OP
Does it's better to mine into wallet with setgenerate parameter or with minerd ?
I'd say minerd would be faster, but i could be wrong. They will be very similar anyway.
July 21, 2014, 09:09:05 AM
Does it's better to mine into wallet with setgenerate parameter or with minerd ?
July 21, 2014, 09:08:01 AM
nodes ?
July 21, 2014, 09:07:26 AM
Can't even find one block running from 1 hr now.We need a pool :/
July 21, 2014, 09:02:11 AM
Compile miner
new error
so many trobles with this sources
new error
Code:
configure.ac:6: error: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.14.1,
configure.ac:6: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
configure.ac:6: comes from Automake 1.11.3. You should recreate
configure.ac:6: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again.
configure.ac:6: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is deprecated, and its use is discouraged.
configure.ac:6: You should use the Autoconf-provided 'AC_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro instead,
configure.ac:6: and use '$(MKDIR_P)' instead of '$(mkdir_p)'in your Makefile.am files.
Makefile.am:12: warning: 'INCLUDES' is the old name for 'AM_CPPFLAGS' (or '*_CPPFLAGS')
July 21, 2014, 08:55:08 AM
I don't understand what is going on here. Rewards for bounties are so high and yet on this coin I put 5 CPUs and got just one block rated at 99.24WHRL. At such low diff I should find much much more blocks, but what's a point reward per block is too low. Can someone explain in simple words what is going on with block reward and why we can't find more blocks at this diff.
It would appear that a very large miner has jumped on and sent the difficulty very high. Hopefully we will get pools shortly
July 21, 2014, 08:50:00 AM
I don't understand what is going on here. Rewards for bounties are so high and yet on this coin I put 5 CPUs and got just one block rated at 99.24WHRL. At such low diff I should find much much more blocks, but what's a point reward per block is too low. Can someone explain in simple words what is going on with block reward and why we can't find more blocks at this diff.
July 21, 2014, 08:42:32 AM
sry just a bad joke
how did that person who gave u negative feedback figure out your two accounts were related?
i dont know , i even dont know anyone of These two persons :-)
but i dont care about it
July 21, 2014, 08:33:08 AM
Dig block! What time are mine pool?
Not at this stage, but maybe later
Strange, that shouldn't be there. Which makefile are you using? Edit out any instances of sph_groestl.h and groestl.c with sph_whirlpool.h and whirlpool.h
I'm not in a position to create one now, but from what I remember it isn't too difficult. You should be able to rewrite the the x11 or quark or qubit hashes to match this one - the hash is in hash.h
Not at this stage, but maybe later
I can`t compile from source.
Code:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive -MMD -MF obj/groestl.d -o obj/groestl.o groestl.c
groestl.c:36:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
#include "sph_groestl.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/groestl.o] Error 1
Strange, that shouldn't be there. Which makefile are you using? Edit out any instances of sph_groestl.h and groestl.c with sph_whirlpool.h and whirlpool.h
Can the dev release a python_hash please so i can release a pool?
I'm not in a position to create one now, but from what I remember it isn't too difficult. You should be able to rewrite the the x11 or quark or qubit hashes to match this one - the hash is in hash.h
July 21, 2014, 08:27:04 AM
Not at this stage, but maybe later
I can`t compile from source.
Which makefile are you using? Edit out any instances of sph_groestl.h and groestl.c with sph_whirlpool.h and whirlpool.hCode:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive -MMD -MF obj/groestl.d -o obj/groestl.o groestl.c
groestl.c:36:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
#include "sph_groestl.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/groestl.o] Error 1
makefile.unix
Never mind, I found it.
Remove groestl.o from the makefile and it should run fine
July 21, 2014, 08:26:09 AM
Not at this stage, but maybe later
I can`t compile from source.
Which makefile are you using? Edit out any instances of sph_groestl.h and groestl.c with sph_whirlpool.h and whirlpool.hCode:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive -MMD -MF obj/groestl.d -o obj/groestl.o groestl.c
groestl.c:36:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
#include "sph_groestl.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/groestl.o] Error 1
makefile.unix
Hmmm... I had the same error so I copied groest.h from another coin. Not sure what I've made.
July 21, 2014, 08:23:03 AM
Not at this stage, but maybe later
I can`t compile from source.
Which makefile are you using? Edit out any instances of sph_groestl.h and groestl.c with sph_whirlpool.h and whirlpool.hCode:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive -MMD -MF obj/groestl.d -o obj/groestl.o groestl.c
groestl.c:36:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
#include "sph_groestl.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/groestl.o] Error 1
makefile.unix
July 21, 2014, 08:19:26 AM
Not at this stage, but maybe later
I can`t compile from source.
Code:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive -MMD -MF obj/groestl.d -o obj/groestl.o groestl.c
groestl.c:36:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
#include "sph_groestl.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/groestl.o] Error 1
Strange, that shouldn't be there. Which makefile are you using? Edit out any instances of sph_groestl.h and groestl.c with sph_whirlpool.h and whirlpool.h
Can the dev release a python_hash please so i can release a pool?
I'm not in a position to create one now, but from what I remember it isn't too difficult. You should be able to rewrite the the x11 or quark or qubit hashes to match this one - the hash is in hash.h
July 21, 2014, 08:16:45 AM
I can`t compile from source.
Code:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/ori/whirlcoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive -MMD -MF obj/groestl.d -o obj/groestl.o groestl.c
groestl.c:36:25: fatal error: sph_groestl.h: No such file or directory
#include "sph_groestl.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/groestl.o] Error 1
July 21, 2014, 08:15:21 AM
Can the dev release a python_hash please so i can release a pool?
Jump to: