Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][WOLF] Project WOLF - page 88. (Read 131019 times)

full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 22, 2014, 01:00:13 AM
I think that I have a problem with the wallet application, every time I close it I receive the message : "This application has requested the runtime to terminate it in an unusual way", in several windows.
And I didn't receive, yet, the Wolf that I bought about 10 hours ago (and which dev confirmed that he sent).
I'm running Windows 7, could somebody help?

Lucky I popped back in! will pm you in a second.

The windows 7 error is a known error #111 in litecoin 0.8.x branch on which our qt is based - I have a couple of competent windows specific programmers working on a fix to be released as soon as possible. The client still works, it just doesn't "terminate" properly.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
February 22, 2014, 12:47:24 AM
I think that I have a problem with the wallet application, every time I close it I receive the message : "This application has requested the runtime to terminate it in an unusual way", in several windows.
And I didn't receive, yet, the Wolf that I bought about 10 hours ago (and which dev confirmed that he sent).
I'm running Windows 7, could somebody help?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
February 21, 2014, 08:09:01 PM
I have been asked to confirm that I also know the developer's real identity, and am prepared to release it should he try anything sneaky. He's got a web presence, so people will be able to do some damage with the info.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 07:34:05 PM
Quote from: InsanityDev
BTC Pot is just under 49 BTC now for the first Insanity Sunday.

This can only end in tears, I can't wait...
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
For the wary, that's 3 verifications from people with various trust ratings, and a few more to come, notably Poloniex, and a very respected and trusted member who I've traded with previously, and who I've also lodged formal id with (Full Drivers License).

Regarding Coin destruction after Insanity Sunday:

I had planned to move coins between two balance until all were destroyed, however I realised today I can simply withdraw them back to the main supply, then send one transaction equal to 10x the received amount. Example:
  • I acquire 15,000 WOLF.
  • I withdraw to the wallet (13636.36 WOLF + 1363.639 tx fee destroyed).
  • Then I send one transaction for 136363 from-to the master wallet, the tx fee on which will be exactly 13636.36
  • This way, in 2 transactions I can destroy the full 15,000 (13636.36+1363.639 = 14999.999)

BTC Pot is just under 49 BTC now for the first Insanity Sunday. I'm offline for the night shortly, with intermittent check ins over the next couple of hours.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
February 21, 2014, 06:21:57 PM
Hey guys. I know the Dev's real identity. If he ever tried to do a run with anything or do anything shady at all, I would release all of his information here. I personally trust him fully and do not think he would do anything bad at all.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
February 21, 2014, 06:15:43 PM
I thought it only occurred when you bought from the IPO (aka directly from the OP, and he would destroy the coin himself.)

I'm really stupid, sometimes... oh well

Consider what you are doing. Those coins are guaranteed to be bought for 3 BTC on Sunday. You have not made a loss, even though 10% fee has been lost. You still hold 3 BTC worth.

Think of this scenario:
one person buys all 900k coins. there is now 900 BTC in the pot.
that person destroys 899k coins. there is now only 1k WOLF with a value of 900 BTC.
that person transfers the 1k to poloniex, they lose 10%.
now on poloniex there are 900 WOLF worth 900 BTC, that are gauranteed to be bought for 900 BTC.
1 wolf = 1 btc at that point.
the person who bought all the coins, has he lost anything?


this is what i'm thinking

dev sell 0.001 BTC/coin
one person buys all 900k coins. there is now 900 BTC in the pot developer.
that person sell all 900k coins at price 0.002BTC. So, dev can only buy 450k with 900BTC in pot.(because only developer want to destroy this coin)
then dev destroy 450k coins. so, now still 450k coins total in that person.

can you explain this?

First, that's already impossible as almost 50k coins have been bought.

Secondly, if that did happen, the person would not have lost any BTC, and they'd hold all the wolf in the world for free. They'd have 100% of their fee. (n.b. exchange site would have a small amount of course from exchange fee). Also they would probably still manage to sell some wolf on market or privately, so they'd likely make some profit. They could in fact repeat this whole exercise if they wanted to.

Finally, much as it's a little interesting, it cannot happen, and it's probably best to focus on situations are at least semi viable Smiley

ok, thank you for the answer. i can't wait insanity sundays  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 06:06:03 PM
I thought it only occurred when you bought from the IPO (aka directly from the OP, and he would destroy the coin himself.)

I'm really stupid, sometimes... oh well

Consider what you are doing. Those coins are guaranteed to be bought for 3 BTC on Sunday. You have not made a loss, even though 10% fee has been lost. You still hold 3 BTC worth.

Think of this scenario:
one person buys all 900k coins. there is now 900 BTC in the pot.
that person destroys 899k coins. there is now only 1k WOLF with a value of 900 BTC.
that person transfers the 1k to poloniex, they lose 10%.
now on poloniex there are 900 WOLF worth 900 BTC, that are gauranteed to be bought for 900 BTC.
1 wolf = 1 btc at that point.
the person who bought all the coins, has he lost anything?


this is what i'm thinking

dev sell 0.001 BTC/coin
one person buys all 900k coins. there is now 900 BTC in the pot developer.
that person sell all 900k coins at price 0.002BTC. So, dev can only buy 450k with 900BTC in pot.(because only developer want to destroy this coin)
then dev destroy 450k coins. so, now still 450k coins total in that person.

can you explain this?

First, that's already impossible as almost 50k coins have been bought.

Secondly, if that did happen, the person would not have lost any BTC, and they'd hold all the wolf in the world for free. They'd have 100% of their fee. (n.b. exchange site would have a small amount of course from exchange fee). Also they would probably still manage to sell some wolf on market or privately, so they'd likely make some profit. They could in fact repeat this whole exercise if they wanted to.

Finally, much as it's a little interesting, it cannot happen, and it's probably best to focus on situations are at least semi viable Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
February 21, 2014, 05:53:28 PM
I thought it only occurred when you bought from the IPO (aka directly from the OP, and he would destroy the coin himself.)

I'm really stupid, sometimes... oh well

Consider what you are doing. Those coins are guaranteed to be bought for 3 BTC on Sunday. You have not made a loss, even though 10% fee has been lost. You still hold 3 BTC worth.

Think of this scenario:
one person buys all 900k coins. there is now 900 BTC in the pot.
that person destroys 899k coins. there is now only 1k WOLF with a value of 900 BTC.
that person transfers the 1k to poloniex, they lose 10%.
now on poloniex there are 900 WOLF worth 900 BTC, that are gauranteed to be bought for 900 BTC.
1 wolf = 1 btc at that point.
the person who bought all the coins, has he lost anything?


this is what i'm thinking

dev sell 0.001 BTC/coin
one person buys all 900k coins. there is now 900 BTC in the pot developer.
that person sell all 900k coins at price 0.002BTC. So, dev can only buy 450k with 900BTC in pot.(because only developer want to destroy this coin)
then dev destroy 450k coins. so, now still 450k coins total in that person.

can you explain this?
NWO
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
February 21, 2014, 05:01:14 PM
I can confirm that I know the true identity of InsanityDev. If there is any wrongdoing/ fraud by the dev, I will happily release this information to the public.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 04:52:20 PM
How will you be proportioning the pot?  For example, will it be an even split between however many exchanges there are (an equal share to be spent on each exchange), a split that is directly proportional to the volume on each exchange or some other relevant statistic, or will it be split purely on a whim, with no particular system in place?

I must update the ANN, the second exchange is not being added, I was scammed by somebody pretending to be from coinmarket.io. For now it's only Poloniex, although perhaps others will add in the future (Cryptsy, McxNow, Coinedup).

For the time being, and probably all of the 9 weeks, we'll stick to Poloniex, that way Insanity Sundays will have more impact. Any change can be proposed or discussed by the community, if that is there's a strong valid reason for changing.


Excellent. I was hoping that was the answer.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
February 21, 2014, 04:45:00 PM
I have a question concerning multiple exchanges that I do not think has been asked yet but should be since it looks like there is a second exchange being added...

How will you be proportioning the pot?  For example, will it be an even split between however many exchanges there are (an equal share to be spent on each exchange), a split that is directly proportional to the volume on each exchange or some other relevant statistic, or will it be split purely on a whim, with no particular system in place?

And on a side note, am I correct in assuming that if I have the wallet running and setgenerate set to true (cpu mining), while there is no benefit to the mining per se, there is a benefit to the network by providing an additional distributed node to process transactions?

this coin method only work for one exchange. maybe dev must remove second exchange.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 04:42:56 PM
How will you be proportioning the pot?  For example, will it be an even split between however many exchanges there are (an equal share to be spent on each exchange), a split that is directly proportional to the volume on each exchange or some other relevant statistic, or will it be split purely on a whim, with no particular system in place?

I must update the ANN, the second exchange is not being added, I was scammed by somebody pretending to be from coinmarket.io. For now it's only Poloniex, although perhaps others will add in the future (Cryptsy, McxNow, Coinedup).

For the time being, and probably all of the 9 weeks, we'll stick to Poloniex, that way Insanity Sundays will have more impact. Any change can be proposed or discussed by the community, if that is there's a strong valid reason for changing.

And on a side note, am I correct in assuming that if I have the wallet running and setgenerate set to true (cpu mining), while there is no benefit to the mining per se, there is a benefit to the network by providing an additional distributed node to process transactions?

Yes, please do, every little helps. There are a few high power rigs to support the network, one is on it all the time, and there's a warning if anybody tries to fork the block chain which kicks in another 5 very high power rigs, with yet more available on demand and prearranged Smiley
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 04:32:52 PM
I have a question concerning multiple exchanges that I do not think has been asked yet but should be since it looks like there is a second exchange being added...

How will you be proportioning the pot?  For example, will it be an even split between however many exchanges there are (an equal share to be spent on each exchange), a split that is directly proportional to the volume on each exchange or some other relevant statistic, or will it be split purely on a whim, with no particular system in place?

And on a side note, am I correct in assuming that if I have the wallet running and setgenerate set to true (cpu mining), while there is no benefit to the mining per se, there is a benefit to the network by providing an additional distributed node to process transactions?
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
February 21, 2014, 04:32:00 PM
I don't know why i cant get my transaction confirmed and the wallet is showing only 1 connection Huh
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
February 21, 2014, 04:16:29 PM
Just wanted to tell that, I know the real identity of InsanityDev ("Not personally") and I have done deal with him in past.

Ps: I am not taking any kind of guarantee of your investments but if anything bad happens I will release his real identity in public.

Keeping my word and chipping in another 1.5BTC into the pot.
PM sent to pack leader.

Yeah, let's do this!  Cool
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 03:58:42 PM
Hey Dev,

Would you keep selling at a price rate of .001 each week until after 9th week?

Yes, the sell rate will not change, and after the 9th week there is no more supply of coins from me, unless it runs out quicker of course.

Please do read the section "questions" on the original post, it clarifies all of these details and additional questions you may have - if there's anything not covered, please do ask Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!
February 21, 2014, 03:52:37 PM
Hey Dev,

Would you keep selling at a price rate of .001 each week until after 9th week?
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
February 21, 2014, 01:59:14 PM
Just wanted to tell that, I know the real identity of InsanityDev ("Not personally") and I have done deal with him in past.

Ps: I am not taking any kind of guarantee of your investments but if anything bad happens I will release his real identity in public.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
February 21, 2014, 01:46:50 PM

Are there any plans to ...?
No, the plan is to buy and destroy as many of the coins purchased as possible, raising each coins individual price and the market cap as high as possible over 10 weeks.
...
Ultimately, every trader has a different strategy, some sell on market immediately for 25% more than they bought, some may be more aggressive and sell 10% for 400% more than they paid. Some may sell off market and destroy more coins by transferring ownership. Some may hold for 4 weeks, or 12 weeks, or a year.


But what if nobody will sell back during the 9 weeks, but keep all the bought coins, waiting the price to be raised by the others ? Why to sell even 1 Wolf of the initial cheap purchase, if it could worth a fortune sometime?

Don't you think that a lot of people (or all !) could judge this way and, if so, the "game" will not work?

nope: https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_wolf
Pages:
Jump to: