Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 412. (Read 1276881 times)
March 09, 2014, 10:09:22 AM
to the moon！！waiting for the web wallte，
March 09, 2014, 09:24:51 AM
Any command to update? Or do I have to download it to update?
try this:
git pull https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP.git master
git submodule update --recursive
Thanks, but I use git clone --recursive https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP.git again.
March 09, 2014, 08:55:27 AM
Any command to update? Or do I have to download it to update?
try this:
git pull https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP.git master
git submodule update --recursive
March 09, 2014, 08:51:26 AM
Good news! Bter is preparing for XCP trading. Early birds deposit XCP at https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/XCP
https://twitter.com/btercom/status/442650783310295040
https://twitter.com/btercom/status/442650783310295040
Great news!!! bter is a very famous and influential exchange platform in China! To the moon!!!
March 09, 2014, 08:42:47 AM
To the moonnnnnnnnnnnn. LOL. 
March 09, 2014, 08:41:11 AM
Good news! Bter is preparing for XCP trading. Early birds deposit XCP at https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/XCP
https://twitter.com/btercom/status/442650783310295040
https://twitter.com/btercom/status/442650783310295040
March 09, 2014, 08:39:14 AM
https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/XCP xcp on BTER!!!!!!
March 09, 2014, 08:23:34 AM
Any command to update? Or do I have to download it to update?
March 09, 2014, 07:57:20 AM
March 09, 2014, 07:24:19 AM
Bug report - The BTC amount display unit is Satoshi which looks like weird.
v6.5
v6.5
Code:
C:\>counterpartyd balances 1Gb2f6axSt528uBfUT54Ed
C:\>echo off
Balances
+-------+---------------+
| Asset | Amount |
+-------+---------------+
| BTC | 41158829 |
| XCP | 1001.80991818 |
+-------+---------------+
C:\>echo off
Balances
+-------+---------------+
| Asset | Amount |
+-------+---------------+
| BTC | 41158829 |
| XCP | 1001.80991818 |
+-------+---------------+
March 09, 2014, 05:19:56 AM
Bug report - If your Bitcoin-QT wallet address have Chinese label, when you use the XCP client, there will be an error as below. After I change all the address label to English, the error disappear, is this a bug?
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\bottle.py", line 862, in _handle
return route.call(**args)
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\bottle.py", line 1727, in wrapper
rv = callback(*a, **ka)
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\bottle.py", line 2675, in wrapper
return func(*a, **ka)
File "counterpartyws.py", line 43, in wallet
for group in bitcoin.rpc('listaddressgroupings', []):
File "C:\BoottleXCP\counterpartyd\lib\bitcoin.py", line 105, in rpc
response_json = response.json()
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\requests\models.py", line 732, in json
return json.loads(self.content.decode(encoding), **kwargs)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe6 in position 71: invalid continuation byte
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\bottle.py", line 862, in _handle
return route.call(**args)
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\bottle.py", line 1727, in wrapper
rv = callback(*a, **ka)
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\bottle.py", line 2675, in wrapper
return func(*a, **ka)
File "counterpartyws.py", line 43, in wallet
for group in bitcoin.rpc('listaddressgroupings', []):
File "C:\BoottleXCP\counterpartyd\lib\bitcoin.py", line 105, in rpc
response_json = response.json()
File "C:\Python32\lib\site-packages\requests\models.py", line 732, in json
return json.loads(self.content.decode(encoding), **kwargs)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe6 in position 71: invalid continuation byte
March 09, 2014, 03:36:27 AM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
Generally speaking, all of the UIs for handling orders right now (e.g. the market command and Blockscan's) are rather rudimentary, and the mechanics of Counterparty orders involving BTC are not always perfectly intuitive. Sometimes it can look like someone's putting up a big buy/sell wall, when in fact he isn't, and in almost all cases the protocol will act as if those walls simply didn't exist. We just need better, more sophisticated user interfaces to properly represent the actual state of the order book at any given time. In the meantime, the order book isn't always what it looks like. Don't worry, plenty of good stuff is on the way
.(In particular, you can never troll the order book from the XCP sell side. If someone wants to buy those XCP from MoneypakTrader, then the protocol will force him to give them up at .002 BTC/XCP. Of course, no one would ever pay the exorbitant fee that he is asking for, so all reasonable orders will just bypass his and go on to match others just fine.)
Essentially though, .002 with an 8 btc fee on a 1000 sell, would be a sell for 0.01 or 10btc total which is rather fair, even cheap in light of what's to come.
Sure, but it's almost double the current market price
.yes, but say you have 50% of the hashing power, then you have a 50% chance of getting your fee back
March 09, 2014, 12:25:53 AM
Is this just a PSD mockup or are there functional UI's?
css, js etc?
Is there a way to release template to community to work on their own skins?
css, js etc?
Is there a way to release template to community to work on their own skins?
JahPowerBit has plans to convert it into a standalone app. Until then you will have full access to the code (its basically just a webpage) so you can tinker around with things. All though I don't recommend this for most users if you are just changing background images then by all means.
That image was a PSD mockup which is a modification of the original theme mockup I did. I mentioned that some elements had or will have been changed before the final product because of font-changes, code problems, etc.
This is how I work. It would be more work to actually code the new theme into the site just to see if the donator likes it.
This is the functional GUI (coded) complete with color selectors for the elements:
If JahPowerBit agrees we can release it to a few forum members to test out. You will need to request a build from him though.
I understand you may not trust me (I commend you for that) but there were some things out of my control.
JahPowerBit is optimizing the system:
Quote
JahPowerBit: When you finished the V1 of your design, i will rewrite all the javascript/css, to have only one requirement: jquery. It's a lot of work, but it's worth, and it will be more secure.
Also my continued addition of elements and new themes is stretching our time frame 
I send JahPowerBit a build almost every night of my progress before I go to sleep.
He has already payed me for my work from the bounty funds.
You can be sure he didn't pay me until he saw work from me.
The developers trust him, and he trusts me.
Have I satisfied your trust now?
You are listening to a lot of Bob Marley for sure
Quit checkin out my tunes bro
Pretty much the whole bob marley discography on there. Good relaxing work music. If you saw there is 134 hours of music on there though so there's quite the variety.
I'm going to be sending JahPowerBit a final build tonight minus the other color themes so you will be able to snag that off the github some time shortly after he gets it, for anyone who wants to play around with the color selector.
March 08, 2014, 09:24:18 PM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
Generally speaking, all of the UIs for handling orders right now (e.g. the market command and Blockscan's) are rather rudimentary, and the mechanics of Counterparty orders involving BTC are not always perfectly intuitive. Sometimes it can look like someone's putting up a big buy/sell wall, when in fact he isn't, and in almost all cases the protocol will act as if those walls simply didn't exist. We just need better, more sophisticated user interfaces to properly represent the actual state of the order book at any given time. In the meantime, the order book isn't always what it looks like. Don't worry, plenty of good stuff is on the way
.(In particular, you can never troll the order book from the XCP sell side. If someone wants to buy those XCP from MoneypakTrader, then the protocol will force him to give them up at .002 BTC/XCP. Of course, no one would ever pay the exorbitant fee that he is asking for, so all reasonable orders will just bypass his and go on to match others just fine.)
Essentially though, .002 with an 8 btc fee on a 1000 sell, would be a sell for 0.01 or 10btc total which is rather fair, even cheap in light of what's to come.
Sure, but it's almost double the current market price
. 
March 08, 2014, 09:23:39 PM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
Generally speaking, all of the UIs for handling orders right now (e.g. the market command and Blockscan's) are rather rudimentary, and the mechanics of Counterparty orders involving BTC are not always perfectly intuitive. Sometimes it can look like someone's putting up a big buy/sell wall, when in fact he isn't, and in almost all cases the protocol will act as if those walls simply didn't exist. We just need better, more sophisticated user interfaces to properly represent the actual state of the order book at any given time. In the meantime, the order book isn't always what it looks like. Don't worry, plenty of good stuff is on the way
.(In particular, you can never troll the order book from the XCP sell side. If someone wants to buy those XCP from MoneypakTrader, then the protocol will force him to give them up at .002 BTC/XCP. Of course, no one would ever pay the exorbitant fee that he is asking for, so all reasonable orders will just bypass his and go on to match others just fine.)
Thanks for that explanation.
If somebody wanted to buy those, which command would they use?
C:\Python32\python.exe run.py order --from=1xx --get-quantity=1000 --get-asset=XCP --give-quantity=10 --give-asset=BTC --expiration=3
or
C:\Python32\python.exe run.py order --from=1xx --get-quantity=1000 --get-asset=XCP --give-quantity=2 --give-asset=BTC --expiration=3 --fee_required=8
??
March 08, 2014, 09:21:08 PM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
Generally speaking, all of the UIs for handling orders right now (e.g. the market command and Blockscan's) are rather rudimentary, and the mechanics of Counterparty orders involving BTC are not always perfectly intuitive. Sometimes it can look like someone's putting up a big buy/sell wall, when in fact he isn't, and in almost all cases the protocol will act as if those walls simply didn't exist. We just need better, more sophisticated user interfaces to properly represent the actual state of the order book at any given time. In the meantime, the order book isn't always what it looks like. Don't worry, plenty of good stuff is on the way
.(In particular, you can never troll the order book from the XCP sell side. If someone wants to buy those XCP from MoneypakTrader, then the protocol will force him to give them up at .002 BTC/XCP. Of course, no one would ever pay the exorbitant fee that he is asking for, so all reasonable orders will just bypass his and go on to match others just fine.)
Essentially though, .002 with an 8 btc fee on a 1000 sell, would be a sell for 0.01 or 10btc total which is rather fair, even cheap in light of what's to come.
March 08, 2014, 09:17:39 PM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
Generally speaking, all of the UIs for handling orders right now (e.g. the market command and Blockscan's) are rather rudimentary, and the mechanics of Counterparty orders involving BTC are not always perfectly intuitive. Sometimes it can look like someone's putting up a big buy/sell wall, when in fact he isn't, and in almost all cases the protocol will act as if those walls simply didn't exist. We just need better, more sophisticated user interfaces to properly represent the actual state of the order book at any given time. In the meantime, the order book isn't always what it looks like. Don't worry, plenty of good stuff is on the way
.(In particular, you can never troll the order book from the XCP sell side. If someone wants to buy those XCP from MoneypakTrader, then the protocol will force him to give them up at .002 BTC/XCP. Of course, no one would ever pay the exorbitant fee that he is asking for, so all reasonable orders will just bypass his and go on to match others just fine.)
March 08, 2014, 09:12:56 PM
Is there some way that the protocol can natively resolve that?
March 08, 2014, 08:48:05 PM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
DOS protection. If you use none, a villain can freeze your orders - for free.
March 08, 2014, 08:29:02 PM
moneypaktrader.com is trolling the DEx by placing 1k for sale at 0.002 but with a 8 btc fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
What is the btc fee for? This will encourage people to put a price of 0.0001 but with a huge BTC fee.
Jump to: