[ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 535.

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 06:59:52 AM

I am seeing orders that are supposed to be matching but not matching??

For instance this order http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3444 (before it got cancelled) should been matched with http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3443 , but did not?

another Example

3447 100 XCP 0.006000 BTC/XCP 0.6 BTC

Should have matched with

3443 200 XCP 0.006 BTC/XCP 1.2 BTC

But are not

There was a rounding bug, whose fix will go into effect with block 286000 (which will be in around a week) in a completely backwards-compatible way. The new version is v0.4.

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 06:59:52 AM

Quote from: mtbitcoin link=topic=395761.[code

ms[/code]g5012798#msg5012798 date=1391847759]
I am seeing orders that are supposed to be matching but not matching??

For instance this order http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3444 (before it got cancelled) should been matched with http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3443 , but did not?

another Example

3447 100 XCP 0.006000 BTC/XCP 0.6 BTC

Should have matched with

3443 200 XCP 0.006 BTC/XCP 1.2 BTC

But are not

There are two orders not matched. Why?

Code:

Open Orders
+---------------------+------------+---------------+--------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Give Quantity | Give Asset | Price | Price Assets | Required BTC Fee | Provided BTC Fee | Time Left | Tx Hash |
+---------------------+------------+---------------+--------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 0.00000167 | XCP | 0.0060 | BTC/XCP ask | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 4999 | 0d8e10c598ea3b07f2cdb8587ae78f900d2f77544c5ec67bde3413ee25a69e84 |
| 0.12 | BTC | 0.0060 | BTC/XCP bid | 0.0 | 0.0001 | 280 | 08b608caf1354272bd19b92fd782b26af987416f2af4a6fa7b0bc7a6c9af99f3 |

Order Matches Awaiting BTC Payment from You
+------------------+-----------+
| Matched Order ID | Time Left |
+------------------+-----------+
+------------------+-----------+

Because 0.00000167 XCP * 0.006 BTC/XCP = 1 satoshi... It's the finite divisibility of Bitcoin.

BitThink

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

rounding issue?

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: mtbitcoin link=topic=395761.[code

ms[/code]g5012798#msg5012798 date=1391847759]
I am seeing orders that are supposed to be matching but not matching??

For instance this order http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3444 (before it got cancelled) should been matched with http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3443 , but did not?

another Example

3447 100 XCP 0.006000 BTC/XCP 0.6 BTC

Should have matched with

3443 200 XCP 0.006 BTC/XCP 1.2 BTC

But are not

There are two orders not matched. Why?

Code:

Open Orders
+---------------------+------------+---------------+--------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Give Quantity | Give Asset | Price | Price Assets | Required BTC Fee | Provided BTC Fee | Time Left | Tx Hash |
+---------------------+------------+---------------+--------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 0.00000167 | XCP | 0.0060 | BTC/XCP ask | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 4999 | 0d8e10c598ea3b07f2cdb8587ae78f900d2f77544c5ec67bde3413ee25a69e84 |
| 0.12 | BTC | 0.0060 | BTC/XCP bid | 0.0 | 0.0001 | 280 | 08b608caf1354272bd19b92fd782b26af987416f2af4a6fa7b0bc7a6c9af99f3 |

Order Matches Awaiting BTC Payment from You
+------------------+-----------+
| Matched Order ID | Time Left |
+------------------+-----------+
+------------------+-----------+

mtbitcoin

legendary

Activity: 876

Merit: 1000

Etherscan.io

I am seeing orders that are supposed to be matching but not matching??

For instance this order http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3444 (before it got cancelled) should been matched with http://blockscan.com/tx.aspx?q=3443 , but did not?

another Example

3447 100 XCP 0.006000 BTC/XCP 0.6 BTC

Should have matched with

3443 200 XCP 0.006 BTC/XCP 1.2 BTC

But are not

led_lcd

sr. member

Activity: 262

Merit: 250

Quote from: jl777 on February 07, 2014, 08:57:16 PM

Clearly, we need a solution that doesnt require sending all this BTC in an unrecoverable way. I had thought there is a way to extract the BTC used for multisig. Why not make the GUI automate this process of recovering it?

A key part of XCP vs MSC is that XCP has lower fees, so this is a critical issue as far as I am concerned

Is this still a problem with OP_RETURN? Multisig is a fallback until OP_RETURN is available in Bitcoin 0.9.

mtbitcoin

legendary

Activity: 876

Merit: 1000

Etherscan.io

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: kdrop22 on February 08, 2014, 12:03:18 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I have the counterpartyd running fine but now am lost.
When a bid is matched, for example I place a request to buy XCP with and it matches an order to sell XCP.
Is the transaction then completed automatically by counterpartyd or do I need to complete the transaction manually?

You would need to do a 'btcsend' to complete the transaction.

Thank you. And would the seller also need to send the XCP to the buyer manually?
Does the system prevent scammer from taking advantage of the exchange?

If anything the buyers of XCP are the most protected as the seller's XCP coins are locked in (balance deducted) by the protocol and only released upon a matching BTCPAY or expiration

mtbitcoin

legendary

Activity: 876

Merit: 1000

Etherscan.io

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 01:20:59 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:58:26 AM

Quote from: qwertyasdfgh on February 08, 2014, 12:55:02 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:41:33 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:38:44 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

已经升级到最新版了

You can't have asset names that start with the letter A.

Correct. Never put an 'A' in front of any asset! This is prohibited by Counterparty protocol.

Got it. But why?

this was explained somewhere back in the thread. It has to do with how the AssetId is calculated based on the asset names and there are certain requirements for this

supersuber

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 104

Counterparty

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:58:26 AM

Quote from: qwertyasdfgh on February 08, 2014, 12:55:02 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:41:33 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:38:44 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

已经升级到最新版了

You can't have asset names that start with the letter A.

Correct. Never put an 'A' in front of any asset! This is prohibited by Counterparty protocol.

Got it. But why?

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: qwertyasdfgh on February 08, 2014, 12:55:02 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:41:33 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:38:44 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

已经升级到最新版了

You can't have asset names that start with the letter A.

Correct. Never put an 'A' in front of any asset! This is prohibited by Counterparty protocol.

qwertyasdfgh

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:41:33 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:38:44 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

已经升级到最新版了

You can't have asset names that start with the letter A.

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:41:33 AM

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:38:44 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

已经升级到最新版了

Try this command:

counterpartyd issuance --source 1xxx --quantity 100 --asset XXXXX --divisible

supersuber

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 104

Counterparty

Quote from: 520Bit on February 08, 2014, 12:38:44 AM

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

已经升级到最新版了

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: supersuber on February 08, 2014, 12:05:29 AM

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

What is your version of countepartyd? You need to update to the latest version v0.3.

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: Wit22 on February 08, 2014, 12:34:45 AM

Are you saying that bitcoind doesn't have to be 'synced' or functioning?
This is my first time installing bitcoind /bitcoin-qt

I am runing Bitcoin-QT which works well. I don't know much about how to use bitcoind.

Wit22

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

Are you saying that bitcoind doesn't have to be 'synced' or functioning?
This is my first time installing bitcoind /bitcoin-qt

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: Wit22 on February 08, 2014, 12:11:22 AM

First of all, thanks to the counterparty team for doing such a great job so far.

Now a question. I want to install counterpartyd
I'm struggling to get bitcoind to work.
My bitcoin-qt has synced fully but when I run bitcoind, it asked to reindex, so I ran the command; now I have a blank open windows terminal with a flashing underscore. Will bitcoind confirm when it's finished reindexing? I have no idea what sort of progress it has made (if any)...

Also. When is the GUI version of counterpartyd due out and will it still require a functioning bitcoind installion and associated python librbaries?

(I'm not a programmer lol.)

You can also run Bitcoin-QT to do the reindex. It works as well. You can install counterpartyd after Bitcoin-QT synced all the blocks to the latest one.

DaFockBro

newbie

Activity: 126

Merit: 0

dayyyyuuuuummmmmm fat sell wall

http://blockscan.com/order_book.aspx

Wit22

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

First of all, thanks to the counterparty team for doing such a great job so far.

Now a question. I want to install counterpartyd
I'm struggling to get bitcoind to work.
My bitcoin-qt has synced fully but when I run bitcoind, it asked to reindex, so I ran the command; now I have a blank open windows terminal with a flashing underscore. Will bitcoind confirm when it's finished reindexing? I have no idea what sort of progress it has made (if any)...

Also. When is the GUI version of counterpartyd due out and will it still require a functioning bitcoind installion and associated python librbaries?

(I'm not a programmer lol.)

supersuber

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 104

Counterparty

issuance --source=YOUR_ADDRESS --asset=ASSETNAME --quantity=QUANTITY divisible

Code:

if asset[0] == 'A': raise exceptions.AssetNameError('starts with ‘A’')
lib.exceptions.AssetNameError: starts with ‘A’

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 535. (Read 1276928 times)