Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 612. (Read 1276933 times)

legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
When I run from source its working fine, but when I try making the installer it says (after doing a lot of stuff)
File not found error [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'C:\\counterpartyd_build\\bin\\exe.win-i386-3.3'

Also, where do I check the testnet XCP?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
The fix for this is in one of my recent commits. Please pull from git and try again.
Everything working now again – thanks for the quick fix.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0


Warning: You must use counterpartyd to send the BTC or the burn will not be recognized.


I am bit confused. Can I get XCP by sending funds to the unspendable address from blockchain.info wallet by these instructions? http://counterpartyd-build.readthedocs.org/en/latest/HowToBurn.html#blockchain-info-my-wallet  


(I am seeing that now the warning is scratched, so I guess I can send funds from blockchain.info wallet using the instructions above)
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Help and Love one another ♥
Ouch -__-
I'd REALLY appreciate this time if you could upload the new database when your computer finish it in 30min.
It's very light, quickly done.
New database mean I cannot use your soft for yet another 36h with my 2GBram/crappy hardware.

A downloadable database would of course be convenient but how could you be sure that the source can be trusted?

If the dev upload it on their git page or on counterpartyd-build.readthedocs.org
It is enough for me now.

(to be 100% trusted: PhantomPhreak could post his PGP key here, sign everything, blablabla. Welcomed, but not necessary for now.
Just a quick upload in the next 12h & habit of updating it each time rebuild-from-start-is-needed)
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
I rebuilt the database and catched up with the last block. When trying to burn BTC I get this error now:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./counterpartyd.py", line 529, in
    json_print(bitcoin.transmit(unsigned_tx_hex, unsigned=args.unsigned))
  File "/Users/Max/counterpartyd/lib/bitcoin.py", line 298, in transmit
    if ask and not is_api:
NameError: global name 'is_api' is not defined

Same error occurs when attempting to issue.

I'm on it. Thanks.

The fix for this is in one of my recent commits. Please pull from git and try again.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
I rebuilt the database and catched up with the last block. When trying to burn BTC I get this error now:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./counterpartyd.py", line 529, in
    json_print(bitcoin.transmit(unsigned_tx_hex, unsigned=args.unsigned))
  File "/Users/Max/counterpartyd/lib/bitcoin.py", line 298, in transmit
    if ask and not is_api:
NameError: global name 'is_api' is not defined

Same error occurs when attempting to issue.

I'm on it. Thanks.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 264
I rebuilt the database and catched up with the last block. When trying to burn BTC I get this error now:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./counterpartyd.py", line 529, in
    json_print(bitcoin.transmit(unsigned_tx_hex, unsigned=args.unsigned))
  File "/Users/Max/counterpartyd/lib/bitcoin.py", line 298, in transmit
    if ask and not is_api:
NameError: global name 'is_api' is not defined

Same error occurs when attempting to issue.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
I rebuilt the database and catched up with the last block. When trying to burn BTC I get this error now:
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./counterpartyd.py", line 529, in
    json_print(bitcoin.transmit(unsigned_tx_hex, unsigned=args.unsigned))
  File "/Users/Max/counterpartyd/lib/bitcoin.py", line 298, in transmit
    if ask and not is_api:
NameError: global name 'is_api' is not defined
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Ouch -__-
I'd REALLY appreciate this time if you could upload the new database when your computer finish it in 30min.
It's very light, quickly done.
New database mean I cannot use your soft for yet another 36h with my 2GBram/crappy hardware.

A downloadable database would of course be convenient but how could you be sure that the source can be trusted?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Help and Love one another ♥
Ouch -__-
I'd REALLY appreciate this time if you could upload the new database when your computer finish it in 30min.
It's very light, quickly done.
New database mean I cannot use your soft for yet another 36h with my 2GBram/crappy hardware.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
The fix is up.

I guess we have to rebuild the database for this to get effective, right?

Actually, I ended up altering the database  schema not for this change (SQLite3 simply cannot do unsigned integers!), but for something unrelated (and actually rather unimportant---making the supported column of the transaction table a proper bool).
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
The fix is up.

I guess we have to rebuild the database for this to get effective, right?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
Yes, my hackish solution from two days ago was off by one, and someone exploited that. I think that I've figured out the correct fix, however, but it requires a DB rebuild, so it'll be a few minutes before I can test it properly and push the commit.

Would appreciate if you can post a quick update once the commit has been pushed.

cheers

Sure. I'm still wrestling with SQLite3 and I have to go AFK for a couple of hours. I'll fix the problem soon!

The fix is up.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Help and Love one another ♥
So is there any practical way to use the Bitcoin Qt wallet as .. an XCP wallet ?
It's created this way. All smooth.
You burn BTC, XCP are created and linked to your pubkey in your BTC wallet.dat

--------

I'm impressed by the burn amount! 1114BTC O.o
Over 300 BTC (over 250'000$) since I last checked! went crazy fast.
Do we have a few heavy heavy burner? over 100 BTC?
I didn't check the transaction record.

I also got the OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to SQLite INTEGER (at block 280807)
I have to update, maybe it's already solved.

PhantomPhreak, may I ask own you manage to see that someone tried to create asset "NEXT" in block 280807?
Can average user also see these kind of thing?
I see nothing from blockchain.info

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
Yes, my hackish solution from two days ago was off by one, and someone exploited that. I think that I've figured out the correct fix, however, but it requires a DB rebuild, so it'll be a few minutes before I can test it properly and push the commit.

Would appreciate if you can post a quick update once the commit has been pushed.

cheers

Sure. I'm still wrestling with SQLite3 and I have to go AFK for a couple of hours. I'll fix the problem soon!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
So is there any practical way to use the Bitcoin Qt wallet as .. an XCP wallet ?
legendary
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
It seems someone tried to create asset "NEXT" in block 280807:
https://blockchain.info/tx/acddcd5bc59349de709b0031e95c5610c233728548e8b308e32efb5d50385ee9

This asset was created with a very large quantity of 2^63 (9223372036854775808) which seems to cause this error.

Yes, my hackish solution from two days ago was off by one, and someone exploited that. I think that I've figured out the correct fix, however, but it requires a DB rebuild, so it'll be a few minutes before I can test it properly and push the commit.
[/quote]

Would appreciate if you can post a quick update once the commit has been pushed.

cheers
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
From what I'm seeing on Blockscan, the last 20 burns didn't go through.


They should go through once the bug issue reported earlier is fixed uploaded to git. So as long as you burnt them correctly with the instructions provided in this thread your should be good to go

Cheers



Hey MTBITCOIN ? Where do you see this project headed? I burned 5 BTC. You think I'm in a good spot ? I just have 2 other questions. Can you point me in the direction of understanding how to get Bitcoin-qt working with counterpartyd.... and will that help me consolidate my XCP ? Cause I have like.. 6,500ish XCP on 5 different BTC addresses. Thanks for any input!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Ok lemme delete my panic posts! Thanks! haha sorry noob here.
legendary
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
From what I'm seeing on Blockscan, the last 20 burns didn't go through.


They should go through once the bug issue reported earlier is fixed uploaded to git. So as long as you burnt them correctly with the instructions provided in this thread you should be good to go

Cheers

Jump to: