[ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 618.

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: jimhsu on January 14, 2014, 12:09:43 PM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 11:56:49 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 11:35:50 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 11:13:19 AM

EDIT: I fixed the bug and pushed to GitHub.

Great, market view is working again.
Now shouldn't the system match these 2 orders?

Code:

| Give Quantity | Give Asset | Get Quantity | Get Asset | Price | Price Assets | Fee | Time Left | Tx Hash |
| 25 | TEST | 0.1 | XCP | 0.0040 | XCP/TEST | 0.0001 | 9866 | a751987c...90d05a76 |
| 0.004 | XCP | 1 | TEST | 250.0000 | TEST/XCP | 0.0001 | 2 | 5d46f970...518978cc |

Hmm. I'll look into that...

I put up some more TEST orders of varying sizes, if you want to try matching them.

I fixed the problem. It was a rounding error. But yes, please do put up more orders!

jimhsu

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 264

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 11:56:49 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 11:35:50 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 11:13:19 AM

EDIT: I fixed the bug and pushed to GitHub.

Great, market view is working again.
Now shouldn't the system match these 2 orders?

Code:

| Give Quantity | Give Asset | Get Quantity | Get Asset | Price | Price Assets | Fee | Time Left | Tx Hash |
| 25 | TEST | 0.1 | XCP | 0.0040 | XCP/TEST | 0.0001 | 9866 | a751987c...90d05a76 |
| 0.004 | XCP | 1 | TEST | 250.0000 | TEST/XCP | 0.0001 | 2 | 5d46f970...518978cc |

Hmm. I'll look into that...

I put up some more TEST orders of varying sizes, if you want to try matching them.

jimhsu

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 264

Quote from: SyRenity on January 14, 2014, 11:51:50 AM

Quote from: SyRenity on January 14, 2014, 05:09:24 AM

Quote from: BitThink on January 14, 2014, 04:40:19 AM

The drawback is that they will have no enough money to hire more developers and provide bounties. The advantage is that the community is more willing to contribute to this project as long as they get some XCP. It's like open-source community project vs. private company project.

That my point exactly, where from these XCP's are going to be paid off?

If the developers are not allocating some development fund (and apparently they not), the only source for these XCP would be the community, which may actually prefer hoarding the coins, rather then donating them for the cause.

Any thoughts from developers about this potential issue?

The developers already burned at least 4 BTC, if not much more (20-40 is probably around the right ballpark).

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 11:35:50 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 11:13:19 AM

EDIT: I fixed the bug and pushed to GitHub.

Great, market view is working again.
Now shouldn't the system match these 2 orders?

Code:

| Give Quantity | Give Asset | Get Quantity | Get Asset | Price | Price Assets | Fee | Time Left | Tx Hash |
| 25 | TEST | 0.1 | XCP | 0.0040 | XCP/TEST | 0.0001 | 9866 | a751987c...90d05a76 |
| 0.004 | XCP | 1 | TEST | 250.0000 | TEST/XCP | 0.0001 | 2 | 5d46f970...518978cc |

Hmm. I'll look into that...

SyRenity

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: SyRenity on January 14, 2014, 05:09:24 AM

Quote from: BitThink on January 14, 2014, 04:40:19 AM

The drawback is that they will have no enough money to hire more developers and provide bounties. The advantage is that the community is more willing to contribute to this project as long as they get some XCP. It's like open-source community project vs. private company project.

That my point exactly, where from these XCP's are going to be paid off?

If the developers are not allocating some development fund (and apparently they not), the only source for these XCP would be the community, which may actually prefer hoarding the coins, rather then donating them for the cause.

Any thoughts from developers about this potential issue?

maxmint

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 11:13:19 AM

EDIT: I fixed the bug and pushed to GitHub.

Great, market view is working again.
Now shouldn't the system match these 2 orders?

Code:

| Give Quantity | Give Asset | Get Quantity | Get Asset | Price | Price Assets | Fee | Time Left | Tx Hash |
| 25 | TEST | 0.1 | XCP | 0.0040 | XCP/TEST | 0.0001 | 9866 | a751987c...90d05a76 |
| 0.004 | XCP | 1 | TEST | 250.0000 | TEST/XCP | 0.0001 | 2 | 5d46f970...518978cc |

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 10:59:56 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 10:55:12 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 10:27:50 AM

I just created a new order to buy 1 TEST for 0.004 XCP. Seems I crashed the "counterpartyd market" view with this, I'm getting this error now:

Code:

lib.exceptions.QuantityError: Fractional quantities of indivisible assets.

Edit: Here's the command I used to create an order for 1 TEST:

Code:

./counterpartyd.py order --from=1B9S7nhAsQeGnU6DWqaMF1G2jamLSFNJkV --get-quantity=1 --get-asset=TEST --give-quantity=0.004 --give-asset=XCP --expiration=10

The system shows my order to be for "0.00000001 TEST":
http://blockscan.com/order.aspx

It seems the "get-quantity" parameter is denominated in a Satoshi style (1 / 100,000,000), is that correct? So if I would like to buy 1 TEST I actually have to use this parameter: "get-quantity=100000000".

I'm pretty sure that that's a bug in blockscan.com. Amounts of indivisible assets (like TEST) should not be divided by 10^8 for display the way that divisible assets are.

EDIT: mtbitcoin, that 'orders' page looks great (I love the colour-coded 'Remarks' column)!

Ok, so "--get-quantity=1" was the correct way?
And still the market view shows an error, so there must be a bug in counterpartyd as well.

That's the correct way, and there's definitely a bug in counterpartyd.

EDIT: I fixed the bug and pushed to GitHub.

prophetx

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1010

he who has the gold makes the rules

Quote from: BitThink on January 14, 2014, 11:00:47 AM

Quote from: Wsbltc on January 14, 2014, 10:04:02 AM

http://www.blockscan.com/

http://www.counterparty-explorer.com/ (use Ctrl F)

Quote from: mcjavar on January 14, 2014, 09:59:15 AM

Hi! Sorry for the dumb question, but where can I see my balance once a burn was successful?

Currently counterparty-explorer.com only shows the XCP obtained by burning. To check the XCP sent by others (e.g. sent by Maxmint), please use blockscan.com instead.

what does this mean on blkockscan:

Code:

[data] CNTRPRTY

BitThink

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wsbltc on January 14, 2014, 10:04:02 AM

http://www.blockscan.com/

http://www.counterparty-explorer.com/ (use Ctrl F)

Quote from: mcjavar on January 14, 2014, 09:59:15 AM

Hi! Sorry for the dumb question, but where can I see my balance once a burn was successful?

Currently counterparty-explorer.com only shows the XCP obtained by burning. To check the XCP sent by others (e.g. sent by Maxmint), please use blockscan.com instead.

maxmint

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on January 14, 2014, 10:55:12 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 10:27:50 AM

I just created a new order to buy 1 TEST for 0.004 XCP. Seems I crashed the "counterpartyd market" view with this, I'm getting this error now:

Code:

lib.exceptions.QuantityError: Fractional quantities of indivisible assets.

Edit: Here's the command I used to create an order for 1 TEST:

Code:

./counterpartyd.py order --from=1B9S7nhAsQeGnU6DWqaMF1G2jamLSFNJkV --get-quantity=1 --get-asset=TEST --give-quantity=0.004 --give-asset=XCP --expiration=10

The system shows my order to be for "0.00000001 TEST":
http://blockscan.com/order.aspx

It seems the "get-quantity" parameter is denominated in a Satoshi style (1 / 100,000,000), is that correct? So if I would like to buy 1 TEST I actually have to use this parameter: "get-quantity=100000000".

I'm pretty sure that that's a bug in blockscan.com. Amounts of indivisible assets (like TEST) should not be divided by 10^8 for display the way that divisible assets are.

EDIT: mtbitcoin, that 'orders' page looks great (I love the colour-coded 'Remarks' column)!

Ok, so "--get-quantity=1" was the correct way?
And still the market view shows an error, so there must be a bug in counterpartyd as well.

PhantomPhreak

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 10:27:50 AM

I just created a new order to buy 1 TEST for 0.004 XCP. Seems I crashed the "counterpartyd market" view with this, I'm getting this error now:

Code:

lib.exceptions.QuantityError: Fractional quantities of indivisible assets.

Edit: Here's the command I used to create an order for 1 TEST:

Code:

./counterpartyd.py order --from=1B9S7nhAsQeGnU6DWqaMF1G2jamLSFNJkV --get-quantity=1 --get-asset=TEST --give-quantity=0.004 --give-asset=XCP --expiration=10

The system shows my order to be for "0.00000001 TEST":
http://blockscan.com/order.aspx

It seems the "get-quantity" parameter is denominated in a Satoshi style (1 / 100,000,000), is that correct? So if I would like to buy 1 TEST I actually have to use this parameter: "get-quantity=100000000".

I'm pretty sure that that's a bug in blockscan.com. Amounts of indivisible assets (like TEST) should not be divided by 10^8 for display the way that divisible assets are.

EDIT: mtbitcoin, that 'orders' page looks great (I love the colour-coded 'Remarks' column)!

maxmint

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

I just created a new order to buy 1 TEST for 0.004 XCP. Seems I crashed the "counterpartyd market" view with this, I'm getting this error now:

Code:

lib.exceptions.QuantityError: Fractional quantities of indivisible assets.

Edit: Here's the command I used to create an order for 1 TEST:

Code:

./counterpartyd.py order --from=1B9S7nhAsQeGnU6DWqaMF1G2jamLSFNJkV --get-quantity=1 --get-asset=TEST --give-quantity=0.004 --give-asset=XCP --expiration=10

The system shows my order to be for "0.00000001 TEST":
http://blockscan.com/order.aspx

It seems the "get-quantity" parameter is denominated in a Satoshi style (1 / 100,000,000), is that correct? So if I would like to buy 1 TEST I actually have to use this parameter: "get-quantity=100000000".

mcjavar

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wsbltc on January 14, 2014, 10:04:02 AM

http://www.blockscan.com/

http://www.counterparty-explorer.com/ (use Ctrl F)

Quote from: mcjavar on January 14, 2014, 09:59:15 AM

Hi! Sorry for the dumb question, but where can I see my balance once a burn was successful?

Thank you very much! So the XCP is bound to the BTC address.

Wsbltc

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

http://www.blockscan.com/

http://www.counterparty-explorer.com/ (use Ctrl F)

Quote from: mcjavar on January 14, 2014, 09:59:15 AM

Hi! Sorry for the dumb question, but where can I see my balance once a burn was successful?

mcjavar

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Hi! Sorry for the dumb question, but where can I see my balance once a burn was successful?

dandelion69

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 06:43:40 AM

If anyone is unable to burn Bitcoins, I'm offering a "escrow burn" service. You can send me your Bitcoins, I burn them for you and send back XCP to an address of your choice.
All details and a request form are here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1GY1pNSLo8PUW8cSb9WJC8OdQOdrZ510pGEXTBIvq3i0

My trust feedback page is here. If you have questions, please just send a PM.

Burnt 1BTC via maxmint today, all went smoothly and received my XCP quickly. Cheers Max.

cryptrol

hero member

Activity: 637

Merit: 500

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 09:16:52 AM

I just sent XCP for an escrow burn, the block containing the transaction was mined by BTC Guild. Sending XCP is done with multi-sig outputs at the moment, so I don't see any reason for pools not to include the transactions.

Oh,I missed the multi-sig output. Thanks for pointing it out.

maxmint

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: cryptrol on January 14, 2014, 09:10:17 AM

Quote from: allwelder on January 14, 2014, 08:30:06 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 08:13:59 AM

Quote from: allwelder on January 14, 2014, 08:06:14 AM

HOW to send XCP ?

Here's how I do it:

Quote

./counterpartyd.py send --from=[sending_address] --to=[receiving_address] --quantity=[quantity] --asset=XCP

Got it,many thanks.

Then it works ?
Which pool is accepting the blocks with the XCP transactions ?
(sorry I did not follow the whole thread)

I just sent XCP for an escrow burn, the block containing the transaction was mined by BTC Guild. Sending XCP is done with multi-sig outputs at the moment, so I don't see any reason for pools not to include the transactions.

cryptrol

hero member

Activity: 637

Merit: 500

Quote from: allwelder on January 14, 2014, 08:30:06 AM

Quote from: maxmint on January 14, 2014, 08:13:59 AM

Quote from: allwelder on January 14, 2014, 08:06:14 AM

HOW to send XCP ?

Here's how I do it:

Quote

./counterpartyd.py send --from=[sending_address] --to=[receiving_address] --quantity=[quantity] --asset=XCP

Got it,many thanks.

Then it works ?
Which pool is accepting the blocks with the XCP transactions ?
(sorry I did not follow the whole thread)

SyRenity

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: delulo on January 14, 2014, 08:42:53 AM

is it known how long the IOU will last?

AFAIK until the end of January (this date is set in source code, so no NXT scenario here...).

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 618. (Read 1276933 times)