I was stating for the facts as i know as usual primer~ will jump on saying it is.
Ahh. I have him on ignore so I guess I don't know what he might be saying about it.
So. Coin switching pool?
EDIT:
Ahh yes...
http://wafflepool.com/stats
Topic: [ANN][XMY] Myriad | Multi-Algo, Fair, Secure - page 189. (Read 850023 times)
I was stating for the facts as i know as usual primer~ will jump on saying it is.
Ahh. I have him on ignore so I guess I don't know what he might be saying about it.
So. Coin switching pool?
EDIT:
Ahh yes...
http://wafflepool.com/stats
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.
Actually seems to happen rather frequently?
This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)
261743 19:16:55 1 1000 21.323 261744000 29.1472 89.2086 34.26%
261742 19:16:52 1 1000 1049511.834 261743000 29.1472 89.2085 34.26%
261741 19:16:48 1 1000 20.897 261742000 29.1473 89.2085 34.26%
261740 19:16:23 1 1000 7721.761 261741000 29.1471 89.2082 34.26%
261739 19:16:21 2 2000 20.479 261740000 29.1472 89.2082 34.26%
261738 19:16:08 1 1000 20.069 261739000 29.1472 89.208 34.26%
261737 19:16:00 1 1000 19.668 261738000 29.1472 89.2079 34.26%
261736 19:15:30 1 1000 19.274 261737000 29.147 89.2076 34.26%
261735 19:15:23 2 10000 18.889 261736000 29.147 89.2075 34.26%
261734 19:14:59 1 1000 18.511 261735000 29.1468 89.2072 34.26%
261733 19:14:58 1 1000 18.141 261734000 29.1469 89.2072 34.26%
261732 19:14:56 1 1000 17.778 261733000 29.147 89.2072 34.26%
261731 19:14:42 1 1000 595.758 261732000 29.147 89.207 34.26%
261730 19:14:35 1 1000 17.422 261731000 29.147 89.2069 34.26%
261729 19:14:31 8 5010.726148 17.074 261730000 29.1471 89.2069 34.26%
261728 19:13:51 1 1000 16.732 261729000 29.1467 89.2064 34.26%
261727 19:13:49 1 1000 16.398 261728000 29.1468 89.2064 34.26%
261726 19:13:46 1 1000 16.802 261727000 29.1469 89.2064 34.26%
261725 19:13:43 1 1000 17.474 261726000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261724 19:13:39 1 1000 18.173 261725000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261723 19:13:38 1 1000 18.9 261724000 29.1471 89.2063 34.26%
A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same
Ahmed
Nobody is spreading misinformation. I haven't seen one person state this was a double spend.
I was stating for the facts as i know as usual primer~ will jump on saying it is.
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.
Actually seems to happen rather frequently?
This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)
261743 19:16:55 1 1000 21.323 261744000 29.1472 89.2086 34.26%
261742 19:16:52 1 1000 1049511.834 261743000 29.1472 89.2085 34.26%
261741 19:16:48 1 1000 20.897 261742000 29.1473 89.2085 34.26%
261740 19:16:23 1 1000 7721.761 261741000 29.1471 89.2082 34.26%
261739 19:16:21 2 2000 20.479 261740000 29.1472 89.2082 34.26%
261738 19:16:08 1 1000 20.069 261739000 29.1472 89.208 34.26%
261737 19:16:00 1 1000 19.668 261738000 29.1472 89.2079 34.26%
261736 19:15:30 1 1000 19.274 261737000 29.147 89.2076 34.26%
261735 19:15:23 2 10000 18.889 261736000 29.147 89.2075 34.26%
261734 19:14:59 1 1000 18.511 261735000 29.1468 89.2072 34.26%
261733 19:14:58 1 1000 18.141 261734000 29.1469 89.2072 34.26%
261732 19:14:56 1 1000 17.778 261733000 29.147 89.2072 34.26%
261731 19:14:42 1 1000 595.758 261732000 29.147 89.207 34.26%
261730 19:14:35 1 1000 17.422 261731000 29.147 89.2069 34.26%
261729 19:14:31 8 5010.726148 17.074 261730000 29.1471 89.2069 34.26%
261728 19:13:51 1 1000 16.732 261729000 29.1467 89.2064 34.26%
261727 19:13:49 1 1000 16.398 261728000 29.1468 89.2064 34.26%
261726 19:13:46 1 1000 16.802 261727000 29.1469 89.2064 34.26%
261725 19:13:43 1 1000 17.474 261726000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261724 19:13:39 1 1000 18.173 261725000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261723 19:13:38 1 1000 18.9 261724000 29.1471 89.2063 34.26%
A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same
Ahmed
Nobody is spreading misinformation. I haven't seen one person state this was a double spend.
Such price.
its ok we need a good troll to live on the forums.
when we all get enraged at his nonsense it motivates us to put a fund together so we can help Primer move out of his parents home and help him pay rent. And then who knows he may actually get a job!
Its a cry for help we need to help him. Think of poor misunderstood Smeagol.
Think of poor misunderstood Smeagol. All he wants is some attention and a shower.
If Primer thinks he can control the price with his magic powers let him!
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.
Actually seems to happen rather frequently?
This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)
261743 19:16:55 1 1000 21.323 261744000 29.1472 89.2086 34.26%
261742 19:16:52 1 1000 1049511.834 261743000 29.1472 89.2085 34.26%
261741 19:16:48 1 1000 20.897 261742000 29.1473 89.2085 34.26%
261740 19:16:23 1 1000 7721.761 261741000 29.1471 89.2082 34.26%
261739 19:16:21 2 2000 20.479 261740000 29.1472 89.2082 34.26%
261738 19:16:08 1 1000 20.069 261739000 29.1472 89.208 34.26%
261737 19:16:00 1 1000 19.668 261738000 29.1472 89.2079 34.26%
261736 19:15:30 1 1000 19.274 261737000 29.147 89.2076 34.26%
261735 19:15:23 2 10000 18.889 261736000 29.147 89.2075 34.26%
261734 19:14:59 1 1000 18.511 261735000 29.1468 89.2072 34.26%
261733 19:14:58 1 1000 18.141 261734000 29.1469 89.2072 34.26%
261732 19:14:56 1 1000 17.778 261733000 29.147 89.2072 34.26%
261731 19:14:42 1 1000 595.758 261732000 29.147 89.207 34.26%
261730 19:14:35 1 1000 17.422 261731000 29.147 89.2069 34.26%
261729 19:14:31 8 5010.726148 17.074 261730000 29.1471 89.2069 34.26%
261728 19:13:51 1 1000 16.732 261729000 29.1467 89.2064 34.26%
261727 19:13:49 1 1000 16.398 261728000 29.1468 89.2064 34.26%
261726 19:13:46 1 1000 16.802 261727000 29.1469 89.2064 34.26%
261725 19:13:43 1 1000 17.474 261726000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261724 19:13:39 1 1000 18.173 261725000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261723 19:13:38 1 1000 18.9 261724000 29.1471 89.2063 34.26%
A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same
Ahmed
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.
Actually seems to happen rather frequently?
This is what, a block every 11 seconds?
261743 19:16:55 1 1000 21.323 261744000 29.1472 89.2086 34.26%
261742 19:16:52 1 1000 1049511.834 261743000 29.1472 89.2085 34.26%
261741 19:16:48 1 1000 20.897 261742000 29.1473 89.2085 34.26%
261740 19:16:23 1 1000 7721.761 261741000 29.1471 89.2082 34.26%
261739 19:16:21 2 2000 20.479 261740000 29.1472 89.2082 34.26%
261738 19:16:08 1 1000 20.069 261739000 29.1472 89.208 34.26%
261737 19:16:00 1 1000 19.668 261738000 29.1472 89.2079 34.26%
261736 19:15:30 1 1000 19.274 261737000 29.147 89.2076 34.26%
261735 19:15:23 2 10000 18.889 261736000 29.147 89.2075 34.26%
261734 19:14:59 1 1000 18.511 261735000 29.1468 89.2072 34.26%
261733 19:14:58 1 1000 18.141 261734000 29.1469 89.2072 34.26%
261732 19:14:56 1 1000 17.778 261733000 29.147 89.2072 34.26%
261731 19:14:42 1 1000 595.758 261732000 29.147 89.207 34.26%
261730 19:14:35 1 1000 17.422 261731000 29.147 89.2069 34.26%
261729 19:14:31 8 5010.726148 17.074 261730000 29.1471 89.2069 34.26%
261728 19:13:51 1 1000 16.732 261729000 29.1467 89.2064 34.26%
261727 19:13:49 1 1000 16.398 261728000 29.1468 89.2064 34.26%
261726 19:13:46 1 1000 16.802 261727000 29.1469 89.2064 34.26%
261725 19:13:43 1 1000 17.474 261726000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261724 19:13:39 1 1000 18.173 261725000 29.147 89.2063 34.26%
261723 19:13:38 1 1000 18.9 261724000 29.1471 89.2063 34.26%
Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now 
q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that
"x11 right now? is temporary
tomorrow someone will make an x22 with 22 algos shoved in there
--
Such price.
rest assured I and likely others have been and made aware the developers of what i called block algo clustering.
so its been known for a while
so its been known for a while
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.
Furthermore, I'd like to remind people that Myriad is the first multi-PoW coin, so there may be imperfections in the way the difficulties/reorganizations are handled. But these can always be solved, patched up, and understood better for the future. We don't have any coins to copy fixes from, we are at the frontier with Myriad and the problems we come across will be the blueprints for other inevitable copies/clones of Myriad's multi-PoW framework.
Think Bitcoin in the beginning years. You just don't know what weird anomalies may arise that you have to patch for. It's positive, it strengthens us in the long run, and we set precedents with the innovative foundation we build up with Myriad.
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
Interesting, I'll run it by the guys
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
The coin is broken and gatra, riecoin developer wrote about it earlier. Seems like 8bit did not fix it afterall. Someone message and ask gatra to take a look at the code now.
Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know what to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?
For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know what to think
You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?For example here (~20 blocks instead of 1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt
Block # Generation time Difficulty
259265 2014-05-22 22:40:52 26.19
259264 2014-05-22 22:40:50 25.666
259263 2014-05-22 22:40:46 25.153
259262 2014-05-22 22:40:41 3064.94522005
259261 2014-05-22 22:40:34 4994.81
259260 2014-05-22 22:40:24 24.157
259259 2014-05-22 22:40:15 23.674
259258 2014-05-22 22:40:02 23.2
259257 2014-05-22 22:39:58 22.736
259256 2014-05-22 22:39:57 22.281
259255 2014-05-22 22:39:50 21.836
259254 2014-05-22 22:39:49 21.399
259253 2014-05-22 22:39:47 20.971
259252 2014-05-22 22:39:42 20.552
259251 2014-05-22 22:39:32 21.305
259250 2014-05-22 22:39:21 22.157
259249 2014-05-22 22:39:17 23.044
259248 2014-05-22 22:39:13 23.965
259247 2014-05-22 22:39:01 4894.912
259246 2014-05-22 22:38:42 24.924
259245 2014-05-22 22:38:36 25.921
259244 2014-05-22 22:38:32 26.958
259243 2014-05-22 22:38:31 28.036
259242 2014-05-22 22:38:21 29.157
Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now
q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that
Although I agree but it just a trend for x11 right now.
The first version for testing is ready of the Myriadcoin Android Wallet:
Download:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet/releases/download/v0.1.0-beta/myriadcoin-wallet-0.1.0-beta.apk
Source Code:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoinj
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet
If you have problems, send in the bug reports or send me a PM.
Download:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet/releases/download/v0.1.0-beta/myriadcoin-wallet-0.1.0-beta.apk
Source Code:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoinj
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet
If you have problems, send in the bug reports or send me a PM.
Installed on galaxy note 2, cyanogenmod 10.2. Works flawlessly (wish there were more active nodes, but that will come, not the client's fault).
As expected, dice games work well with this app, I'm happily gambling MYR while away from my qt client....
People, take advantage of the "donate" function in this client and send hashengineering some MYR, well deserved.
Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now
q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that I love Keccak ( Sha3). On a R9 290 it makes 15 MH /s and you can play while mining, even on max intensity.
Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now
q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that
Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now
i installed it on 4.2.2 and it looks good so far
Jump to: