The explorer page is now @ explorer.yacoin.org Post has been updated.
Topic: [ANN][YAC] Yacoin Network Graphs! (Read 2725 times)
Link is sadly dead now 
Address balance list updated up to block #210732. Also, here's a normalized hashrate graph, assuming 50% hashrate decrease on each Nfactor change (I'm not entirely convinced it's correct). The formula I'm using is:
where 0.5 is the hashrate decrease factor and 9 is the Nfactor we're normalizing for (N=1024 as in litecoin and other altcoins).
I don't like the sharp drops after each Nfactor change. Any clues as to why might this be happening? Could this be because of broken GPU miners that needed code changes for each N change? Also, need feedback on the 50% figure.
Code:
f_normalize(time, hashrate) = hashrate / (0.5**(f_getNfactor(time) - 9))
I don't like the sharp drops after each Nfactor change. Any clues as to why might this be happening? Could this be because of broken GPU miners that needed code changes for each N change? Also, need feedback on the 50% figure.
Looks good sairon! I also think it might be useful to show normalized difficulty, but I'm also not entirely convinced that the formula is correct. I am quite certain though that the sharp drops after each N change are due to h/w errors, and essentially is showing that YACoin is working as designed - i.e. it's a CPU coin.
Address balance list updated up to block #210732. Also, here's a normalized hashrate graph, assuming 50% hashrate decrease on each Nfactor change (I'm not entirely convinced it's correct). The formula I'm using is:
where 0.5 is the hashrate decrease factor and 9 is the Nfactor we're normalizing for (N=1024 as in litecoin and other altcoins).
I don't like the sharp drops after each Nfactor change. Any clues as to why might this be happening? Could this be because of broken GPU miners that needed code changes for each N change? Also, need feedback on the 50% figure.
Code:
f_normalize(time, hashrate) = hashrate / (0.5**(f_getNfactor(time) - 9))
I don't like the sharp drops after each Nfactor change. Any clues as to why might this be happening? Could this be because of broken GPU miners that needed code changes for each N change? Also, need feedback on the 50% figure.
Modified difficulty graphs to NOT show PoS difficulty, as it is orders of magnitude lower than PoW diff (uses different "scale", but it was displayed as 0.25 - which is now higher than PoW diff, LOL).
block time is so slow now after N changed.. takes ages to verify transfer
Takes a while for the difficulty to adjust, no recourse but to wait.Just another 108 seconds less and we're back at 60.
Also, top 50 richest addresses list updated as per request at http://yacointalk.com/index.php/topic,425.0.html
Someone now owns (at least) 0.6M YAC (out of 5.6M), cool!
block time is so slow now after N changed.. takes ages to verify transfer
Takes a while for the difficulty to adjust, no recourse but to wait.
block time is so slow now after N changed.. takes ages to verify transfer
Changed the Y axis of the all-time network hashrate graph to logarithmic scale, in order to to able to see the current hashrate.
Now with a countdown to next Nfactor change on the graphs page! (javascript required)
Also, added timestamp of last graph update.
Also, added timestamp of last graph update.
Occassionaly, one of the images, two of them or all three images on the right does not show up.
It's a known issue. Usually it comes up on the next graph update (every hour). I'll look into it when I have the time.
Top 10 addresses by final balance:
I started a threat on yacointalk about these huge wallets, but it would be nice to have more infos on that. Could you please add a graph showing (f.e Top 100 or even more) of the biggest adresses. The numbers for themselve seem to be useless but distribution charts of some sort could be useful.EDIT: Oh and by the way, keep up the good work!
Random Yacoin Facts:
- There are 30616 addresses used so far.
- Top 10 receiving addresses:
Code:
address received
YBJeQQFCipbC4LrZTnTu6j5rSAMsqRkGJb 441151.00000000
Y8pzvdVPNKjhRQYnRWGd1sEcE7WKrGpqcV 314843.88000000
YDFcVs8sxTbym6K6msd2ziXtp8kwYhG1rw 304656.25000000
YJH8f3XKtTXWHpCAgYpQCi5HAQ7SCPGSXA 273753.93000000
Y2e1VP9ZpwYCbVMk7RRhGDLwRKyuQwjzGQ 186557.13978700
Y42xBGnxyoNfHDfvGiVfH8D8U34xthPxy8 159695.18000000
YAP2R5EfeiBSREwUJmdKEzd5HhvmpfkLHs 142114.29000000
Y5M9ec642cQGfe35HyYwqgNxvKr4ufoWiT 110849.44126400
Y9A8mdy2rqFihhGssGZEc7Npg5YZU4byHX 102909.92500000
YNwKaaULjo2hPJCi4FzVvqLonykLAq6SPT 102909.56990000
- Top 10 sending addresses:
Code:
address sent
YDFcVs8sxTbym6K6msd2ziXtp8kwYhG1rw 304656.25000000
YAP2R5EfeiBSREwUJmdKEzd5HhvmpfkLHs 142114.29000000
Y5M9ec642cQGfe35HyYwqgNxvKr4ufoWiT 110849.44126400
YNwKaaULjo2hPJCi4FzVvqLonykLAq6SPT 102909.56990000
Y5JxizRK44ahePgNqgZDRjE9Bks58NohWQ 90320.46000000
Y5ve8DUxxUsX2uwcw54Mpwp4zV1gTeB56y 82832.35000000
YB24c3Uwenem72g7dhY5aP2RJg8oY72pzL 82732.00000000
Y1UdvTxdfMrCckK8S4ceS7VxR3ivx7yWMq 76614.71400000
YF3gMrRKbgL3kkNwG42XnBzjk23wvgWi7W 74413.44000000
Y7YMAVrC6YYe28kgqEog9e2LbjU5iTHhsm 67241.13272900
- Top 10 addresses by final balance:
Code:
address balance
YBJeQQFCipbC4LrZTnTu6j5rSAMsqRkGJb 441131.00000000
Y8pzvdVPNKjhRQYnRWGd1sEcE7WKrGpqcV 314843.88000000
YJH8f3XKtTXWHpCAgYpQCi5HAQ7SCPGSXA 273741.93000000
Y2e1VP9ZpwYCbVMk7RRhGDLwRKyuQwjzGQ 185299.17978700
Y42xBGnxyoNfHDfvGiVfH8D8U34xthPxy8 99431.00000000
Y9kxx3oWXnVGV5gd8yHUMWcmV3BFRaLQAX 91402.91000000
Y4D4gQ32YhGP61CTRHJG9HM9M8HRAxMHom 74280.00000000
YMbVUEiaTEKM5wvQFtQ9cM9fNUMYceiVYA 70000.00000000
Y9A8mdy2rqFihhGssGZEc7Npg5YZU4byHX 52910.14500000
Y1dncJeBobRiYiBop6LWsUXq9fm8HbQfsp 50853.56924000
Really like it.
Interesting graphs. How did you carry out those GPU simulations? Is there a GPU miner out there for YAC? 
There are at least 4 GPU miner implementations, although none of them has been released as of now. mtrlt claims to have made the fastest one so far, see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2241855Nice find. Glad I am not a YAC miner lol.
Interesting graphs. How did you carry out those GPU simulations? Is there a GPU miner out there for YAC?
There are at least 4 GPU miner implementations, although none of them has been released as of now. mtrlt claims to have made the fastest one so far, see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2241855
Interesting graphs. How did you carry out those GPU simulations? Is there a GPU miner out there for YAC?
Added a table with Nfactor increase dates/times, memory usage and CPU/GPU hashing speed comparison.
http://yacexplorer.tk/graphs.htm#tech
http://yacexplorer.tk/graphs.htm#tech
Nice work, loving this. Look forward to the upgrade to JS 
How do you guys like the new graphs? I changed the way Nfactor is plotted.
How long until we have difficulty less than 1?
How long until we have difficulty less than 1?
Jump to: