I know several well-known online casinos that operate with crypto and do not ask for KYC for as long as someone isn't crossing certain thresholds I guess. I believe if the amount of money someone is wagering or depositing crosses certain boundaries, it is probably in the best interest of the casino itself to have certain checks in place. But for the average gambler, which I think I am, there are still casinos allowing people to gamble from time to time and also withdraw without any issues. I'd say that anonymity is still a thing in terms of casinos if someone really wants it. But of course the risk that KYC is requested is always there if someone was relying on never getting asked for it. Better be ready to provide it if you want to get the money out in any case.
Your privacy and anonymity are only disturbed when you start depositing or requesting very high withdrawals which makes the casinos compelled to at least get a check to know where the money is coming from or whether you are okay with them knowing you before they allow you to withdraw such a large amount from them, and if you hesitate and don't comply with their rules, they won't have a choice but to confiscate your funds or don't allow you to withdraw since you made it look suspicious for them.
So, you are right that regular gamblers who only deposit and withdraw small or medium amounts wouldn't have to worry about their privacy and anonymity even if they are using a big and reputable platform for their gambling activities because such amounts don't make that big of a difference and a criminal wouldn't play with a few hundred dollars, of course.
Exactly, things are like this, I have a friend in Spain who tells me that in order to make the transfers he did them through an exchange, but that it is no longer safe , Because he now has to Comply with the KYC requirements, so that's why Half of him is very tied up with a notion that if he does or does KYC , it is something that has to be yes or yes, but he is a person who loves his anonymity, he does not give in the least he does not agree to do any type of KYC in the casinos, he tells me that he prefers not to play, and he loves poker, but in the same way he tells me that even though he loves poker there are no good platforms so far, but in this case when he takes the measure of not letting himself be dragged into a system where anonymity no longer exists , he will not be in the system, that's how he tells me, I don't know how else I can confront this, and just like him there are many other people who also think like him, I don't Criticize him or anything because he He is right, if he doesn't want to, he doesn't have to be forced.
He also talks to me about the casinos because they are decentralized, he tells me that they are not reliable and that they can cause many problems and that they are very expensive, the more there are KYC requirements, there will come a time where people will no longer want to require any type of KYC. and they will be in another type of world, where it could be something very bad for the casinos, I don't know, but it could be that now the casinos have another type of domain or another type of relevance, I have thought that even in the cloud or something can be done in the metaverses, something like this can be devised so that the caisno continue living or surviving, of course this is mere speculation and it's just what I can think of, I don't want to say that things are like that, but basically what can be summarized here Based on this, there will come a time where the most valued by people will not be the casinos with the best promotions or contests, but those that provide privacy again, and that may be sooner than ever.