Topic: Anonymity of cryptocurrencies owners - page 4. (Read 566 times)
Our savings really can not be 100% protected from hackers. But when we keep money in banks, they're not protected either. Many banks went bankrupt. Governments or bankers may, at their discretion, charge you with illegal activities and freeze accounts. It seems to me that the likelihood of hackers breaking less.
I have always supported bitcoin and its anonymity. Today, we heard about the users who got hacked after they logged in to myetherwallet. This wasn't the first time some users got hacked and there is no doubt it will happen again. It can happen to all of us. There is no difference you are holding bitcoin, Litecoin or Ethereum. All of us wish it was possible to punish that hacker. But all the holders are anonymous. So, anonymity is not always good. What is your opinion about cryptocurrencies anonymity considering this issue?
it is the nature of the business. Users still can make sure they don't get hacked by using device like trezor and double checking if the domain they're on is really the one...
I have always supported bitcoin and its anonymity. Today, we heard about the users who got hacked after they logged in to myetherwallet. This wasn't the first time some users got hacked and there is no doubt it will happen again. It can happen to all of us. There is no difference you are holding bitcoin, Litecoin or Ethereum. All of us wish it was possible to punish that hacker. But all the holders are anonymous. So, anonymity is not always good. What is your opinion about cryptocurrencies anonymity considering this issue?
Jump to: