Topic: Anonymous Ads - bitcoin advertising network [migration to v.2] - page 4. (Read 44746 times)
November 20, 2012, 05:55:53 PM
I've not received a payment from Anon Ads since October 24th - 143Jgi4ycmHG3AUNEFTaWWTWXtAdMKNTpu - Has traffic just died off?
November 15, 2012, 03:08:30 PM
Thanks for your message! Are you talking about this https://anonymousads.com/site/615 ? I don't see any harm from it, except flooding the database. It is easy to remove records with health 0% from the database, and also there is some implicit limitation on amount of affiliates on the page. Frankly speaking I don't quite understand what's the incentive to register sites like that. Is there any except vandalism? 
Yes, that's the one. And yes, that's just for vandalism I guess, lots of people do that on Wikipedia, why not elsewhere too 
. Or maybe experimenting how the site copes with this kind of situation... November 15, 2012, 04:13:25 AM
With this "no account, open access for all" concept came a new kind of spam: some @$$**** spammed a bunch of accounts with a link to bit.ly/U0abCg (NB: don't visit, might crash your browser, although the link I put here is just the bit.ly stat page, which is safe). Any way to remove this?
Thanks for your message! Are you talking about this https://anonymousads.com/site/615 ? I don't see any harm from it, except flooding the database. It is easy to remove records with health 0% from the database, and also there is some implicit limitation on amount of affiliates on the page. Frankly speaking I don't quite understand what's the incentive to register sites like that. Is there any except vandalism?
November 15, 2012, 01:07:43 AM
With this "no account, open access for all" concept came a new kind of spam: some @$$**** spammed a bunch of accounts with a link to bit.ly/U0abCg (NB: don't visit, might crash your browser, although the link I put here is just the bit.ly stat page, which is safe). Any way to remove this?
November 06, 2012, 01:19:06 AM
Sorry for the downtime, I am working to resolve the issue.
Wow.. it took me about a week to fix it. Should be more responsive now.
November 01, 2012, 12:55:52 PM
Sorry for the downtime, I am working to resolve the issue.
November 01, 2012, 12:17:26 PM
For me its down! Hope it will get fixed...
October 31, 2012, 04:34:49 PM
I wonder if the profits from showing the banners will ever sync with the main server once it comes back up...
EDIT: looks like it is up, just very slow, to the point that half of the time the connection drops before the page is served.
EDIT: looks like it is up, just very slow, to the point that half of the time the connection drops before the page is served.
October 29, 2012, 03:37:18 PM
Wazzup?
October 12, 2012, 02:20:34 AM
Looking forward to testing this once the site comes back online.
October 12, 2012, 02:17:37 AM
Very strange, anonymousads.com website is down but banners work fine. Do you have 2 servers?
Most likely:anonymousads.com => 78.47.172.10
ad.anonymousads.com => 78.47.125.166
October 11, 2012, 11:22:26 PM
Very strange, anonymousads.com website is down but banners work fine. Do you have 2 servers?
Textads work but imageads for forums dont.
October 11, 2012, 06:02:58 PM
Very strange, anonymousads.com website is down but banners work fine. Do you have 2 servers?
October 11, 2012, 02:41:57 PM
Down for me too 
October 11, 2012, 01:20:31 PM
could it be that the service isdoen atm?
October 05, 2012, 06:32:00 PM
I removed site weights. Affiliates will be rewarded in proportion to *( + 1).
Might be a bit biased in favor of those who give an incentive to click, and a lot in favor of those with a higher number of visits (basically, this is equivalent to Nvisits^2*CTR with a twist to avoid CTR=0). Also, why only 7 days? (which basically increases variability)How about something like Nvisits*sqrt(CTR*100) over last 30 days? (with still a twist to avoid CTR=0)
Thanks! You are right, too much bias towards large sites. NVisits^2 is not good.
I increased the period to 30 days and replaced the formula with just
I think the system needs some bias in favor of clicks since some affiliates put banners at places that almost never get clicked, that is not good for advertisers.
Clicks without a reasonable amount of impressions are not counted as qualified anyway, so shouldn't be that a huge favor for sites that give incentive to click.
By the way, there is an ongoing contest for AA logo. Submit your ideas and get your cut of 6 btc bounty. See this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-6-btc-for-sketches-of-anonymous-ads-logo-114738
October 05, 2012, 02:48:02 PM
I removed site weights. Affiliates will be rewarded in proportion to *( + 1).
Might be a bit biased in favor of those who give an incentive to click, and a lot in favor of those with a higher number of visits (basically, this is equivalent to Nvisits^2*CTR with a twist to avoid CTR=0). Also, why only 7 days? (which basically increases variability)How about something like Nvisits*sqrt(CTR*100) over last 30 days? (with still a twist to avoid CTR=0)
October 05, 2012, 11:33:31 AM
Great to know you're working on a new version of AA. It would be a bit sad to see one of the first Bitcoin-driven advertising networks, with some interesting features, be left behind newer ones with more conservative approaches that are made to work right for big websites/rich advertisers, while almost leaving out the smaller ones.
October 05, 2012, 11:12:28 AM
I removed site weights. Affiliates will be rewarded in proportion to *( + 1).
Please note that and are filtered according to some internal criteria. Globally unique IPs and reasonable CTRs are rewarded. Those earnings will be still shown as "Earned from sites:" on affiliates' page (even though they are not related to sites anymore).
I hope I didn't mess anything, let's see how it works.
This is still a temporary solution, I work on AA2 that will introduce major changes and replace this logic too.
Please note that
I hope I didn't mess anything, let's see how it works.
This is still a temporary solution, I work on AA2 that will introduce major changes and replace this logic too.
October 05, 2012, 06:23:55 AM
The news I'd like to hear about the weights, is that they become proportional to the affiliate's number of impressions and clicks, and not just some fixed number.
Jump to: