No problem with the respect she earns but should we leave all these feedback left by Lauda only? Can't we have more DT members tagging those users? I get it that it's a huge job but this is also truth that if Lauda is out from DT then the real scammers get the tickets because the feedback will not reflect in their trust page.
Besides Lauda also get this monopoly unannounced power that for her work people will keep her in their trust list and she will feel so satisfied that she will not notice her mistakes which will eventually lead her to leave wrong feedback. Too much power is not good. It make things centralized.
In fact we are seeing some2 controversial feedback coming from her. In some cases she even do not care to start false argument with other users. An example:
No surprise about your vast intellect given that you use urban dictionary as your source knowledge. 
It was about if the word "pajeet" is racist or not. Lauda has to deny it that it's not resist or her support for some users who she favors will be weaken. There are many more examples can be given where Lauda blatantly changing the direction of a topic just to deny that she is wrong. But still we see a lot of DT trust her judgement. Do we have this in mind that distrusting her will give open ticket to some of the scammers?
Let's have a look on some of the recent feedback she lefts for users3/4.
Continues his dishonest, malicious and dangerous behaviour. Avoid this user.
For andulolika reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53994888 Wrong use of trust feedback system Tagging people because they leave open opinion which she does not like.Bitcoin Cash shill spreading fake propaganda in order to deceive newcomers. Do not trust a single word written by this user.
Sometimes hope for betterment is wasted.
For user jbreher reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24699396 Wrong use of trust feedback system Tagged because the user has different view about Bcash/BSV. Sometimes hope for betterment is wasted.
Tried to bait me into doing something illegal. Possibly an agency employee. Danger.
For user l19765 reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53960824 I may not tag a user because of sending me PM but I will not see it's wrong to tag as well. Possibly it's a good feedback considering the user is newbie.Alts enrolling in the same campaign.
The other connected account is > kolonel_x (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kolonelx-942058).
For user watergold reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53946506 A valid feedback. Connection looks good.The other connected account is > kolonel_x (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kolonelx-942058).
Flag created for mich reference = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1417
Flag created for domsch reference = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1416
I am not sure about the cases as I did not see them deep so I will ignore these two.
Alt account created solely for defamation and attacks. High-risk and untrustworthy.
For user bonesjonesreturns reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53931673 She thinks like that hence she tagged but this should not be the good use of trust system.Tried to scam ChiBitCTy.
For user Leonard2016 reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34229263 considering the shady practice I will agree with this tagFlag for poochpocket reference = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1413
Flag for hacker1001101001 reference = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412
Even if they are connected still leaving red does not look good. These flags are more like the personal conflict between two users.
Do not trust this user due to their obvious biased malicious nature. Frivolous libel against established reputable company. Dealing with them will have damaging consequences to the individual and/or service provider. Recommendation: Do not trust and avoid.
For user allahabadi reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53907095 She tagged the user because she did not like the way the user talked to her (it seems)Flag and tag for Bitcoin.Gold
Tag reference = https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/btg-bitcoin-gold-scam-a-fools-gold-thats-not-bitcoin-either-5228799
Flag reference = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1408
I will keep gray area in this project
I think most of the DT do not want to distrust Lauda is because they think distrusting her will allow a lot of scammers to get their account becoming a regular account since Lauda has thousands of tags left for scammers. There are some good tags but that does not mean Lauda will keep doing the wrong things and for the sake of those good tags you all will keep trusting her?
I get your point, and that probably is one reason why Lauda hasn't been excluded from people's trust lists more than has already happened. 1 Please do some +/- it's not a big deal to have the accurate number
2 May be not some but more and more
3 I tried to archive using LoyceV's tool but not sure if I have done it correctly. I will use an screenshot for backup. This screenshot has her latest 50 sent feedback.
4 We are considering top 25 feedback to find a conclusion. It's not possible to review all the feedback in this topic but it's a start after all.