Topic: Another STO failed! STO won't work anymore. - page 2. (Read 835 times)
I also stopped trusting STO a long time ago. I don't see any point in supporting them, let alone participating in the bounty. This has long been almost dead direction.
Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, -snip-
Why do you state this project is good looking? I don't see anything special from this project. It looks like the same as other new projects. On the contrary, on the bounty thread, the bounty manager didn't enclose the links of important sources of this project such as ANN thread and their social media. It is a bit strange for me!-snip- I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! -snip-
Not only STO, but IEO and ICO also have the same problems. The lack of interest from investors makes the new projects often failed to get their target on fundraising. While, if they can list their tokens on exchanges, the tokens are only about pump-dump. It makes sense if investors aren't interested in new projects anymore. 
ICO failed in 2017.
STO failed in 2018.
IEO failed in 2019.
What else will come? What else will scam investors? How many scams we need to learn from our mistakes.
I would like to see finally regulated crypto startups that provide real results?
STO failed in 2018.
IEO failed in 2019.
What else will come? What else will scam investors? How many scams we need to learn from our mistakes.
I would like to see finally regulated crypto startups that provide real results?
I can not agree with you. Everyone is screaming about failures, but what does it really mean. Indeed, if 5 out of 100 projects, 5 have become really successful and the crypto market has been advanced by several steps, then in my opinion this can be called success and not failure. Look at how fundraising behaves in the field of start-ups, there are all over the place with continuous failures. Nevertheless, the most significant projects find their way to the top.
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
ICO failed in 2017.
STO failed in 2018.
IEO failed in 2019.
What else will come? What else will scam investors? How many scams we need to learn from our mistakes.
I would like to see finally regulated crypto startups that provide real results?
STO failed in 2018.
IEO failed in 2019.
What else will come? What else will scam investors? How many scams we need to learn from our mistakes.
I would like to see finally regulated crypto startups that provide real results?
I have participated in their bounty campaign, their plans where promising, they have already working platform but the bad market situation is killing every promising project.
Lets wait, I believe that in a bull market situation will back to the normal and se will again earn huge rewards in the bounty campaigns.
Lets wait, I believe that in a bull market situation will back to the normal and se will again earn huge rewards in the bounty campaigns.
Well if you haven't learnt your lesson by now then I don't know how you ever will. It's not the bad market situation killing every project, it's just people are tired of projects that aren't really bringing any value, and hence has no actual potential other than speculation or pump+dump to get their prices up.
Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.
Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-liqio-exchange-sto-fail-90000-5210813
Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-liqio-exchange-sto-fail-90000-5210813
Sincerely all these failed STOs isn't giving the STO method of public fundraising a good name at all. When one meets a new STO, the failed ones will come to mind thus discouraging the potential investors. However, I think if STO is worked on and a good project with good ideas and maybe with an already developed products comes to play, through the right promotion and marketing it might perform well, because I still think good promotion matters too. Lastly the team have a big role to play, because everything starts with them, hence the need for an already developed product to start with.
I can still give an STO project a try if it has good potential enough to fill my taste, I am smart enough to understand how hard it can be for new projects to attract investors so I won't judge STO over IEO and ICO, they are all same thing
I don't think it's the fundraising that's causing the projects to fail, I think it's generally on the teams and investors, the teams aren't showing enough courage and strength for investors to trust them, they mostly appear just like ICO projects
30 percent of softcap is way too low.
I don't think they could stand with that kind of amount of money.
The very least is to to fill that softcap at 100 percent for the project to continue.
It looks like a lot of money for us but they will also need to pay employees and people which they hired for just a short time like advisers and a lot more.
It may not even be enough yet.
Shit happens, and this is one example of that.
I don't think they could stand with that kind of amount of money.
The very least is to to fill that softcap at 100 percent for the project to continue.
It looks like a lot of money for us but they will also need to pay employees and people which they hired for just a short time like advisers and a lot more.
It may not even be enough yet.
Shit happens, and this is one example of that.
Fund raising is the main issue with STO projects, I guess it's the lack of trust that's affecting ICO since trust issue arise in crypto space in 2018 and mere looking at STO and ICO the different is not much, I hope STO can be successful
I don't think it's about the trust issue, because they are registered by the sec or law, that's why they called Security or Centralized token. But as crypto supporters don't like the Centralized system, maybe this is the main reason STO can't raise money from their sale.
Fund raising is the main issue with STO projects, I guess it's the lack of trust that's affecting ICO since trust issue arise in crypto space in 2018 and mere looking at STO and ICO the different is not much, I hope STO can be successful
Right, because between STO and ICO it is almost similar so that trust in STO also does not increase among large investors, so projects that make fundraising through STO are very difficult to reap success in 2018 and early 2019.Fund raising is the main issue with STO projects, I guess it's the lack of trust that's affecting ICO since trust issue arise in crypto space in 2018 and mere looking at STO and ICO the different is not much, I hope STO can be successful
Right, because between STO and ICO it is almost similar so that trust in STO also does not increase among large investors, so projects that make fundraising through STO are very difficult to reap success in 2018 and early 2019.
Fund raising is the main issue with STO projects, I guess it's the lack of trust that's affecting ICO since trust issue arise in crypto space in 2018 and mere looking at STO and ICO the different is not much, I hope STO can be successful
The bounty project I'm promoting is STO project that many knew they fails alot but I'm not that bothered because this project is trying to deliver something entirely fresh, it win the best startup project of 2019 and I can't wait to see how far this project will go
Yes, please wait for how far the project will go, because not all STO projects are bad and not all people's evaluations of STO projects are wrong, because most STO projects are unable to compete with others, making it difficult for some STO projects to rise. 
At present, there are not any clear standards for assessing security token and the issuance of security tokens. Standards are defined by individual organizations, not by government agencies. That is a favorable condition for the bad guys to break the law, or build up fraud projects,
The standard of security token already defined by the legal standard that created by an official institution like SEC, if you are not following it and that means your security was illegal security. The problem is not so many people understand it properly about what criteria for the token that can be called as a security standard. 
At present, there are not any clear standards for assessing security token and the issuance of security tokens. Standards are defined by individual organizations, not by government agencies. That is a favorable condition for the bad guys to break the law, or build up fraud projects,
Today I just noticed another good looking STO failed, and that STO project name is Liqio Exchange! I have never seen an STO that raised good money and doing good in the market! So why they keep coming I don't have any idea about it. I told all my friends that don't join in any STO bounty, just ignore them.
Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-liqio-exchange-sto-fail-90000-5210813
Liqio STO failed, source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-liqio-exchange-sto-fail-90000-5210813
Well never heard of this STO before. But I doubt there is any STO that has done well in the market. STOs and ICO have failed to deliver. Gone are the good days of them.
Yeah, it is really never going to be a standard. People still think that the way offering happens decides the funding it gets or decides on how good it will be. The reality is, doesn't matter if it is ICO or STO or IEO, if a coin is good it is good, if a coin is bad it is bad, how it was offered will not change that.
Sometimes there is hype and some projects gets more money than they deserve, look at leo and look at binance early IEO ones and you see they were hyped and got more than they deserve, on top of that look at previously on 2017 peak times, projects got funded in billions total and not many of them became good. So long story short, how it is offered is not the issue, the projects itself are the real problems we have to somehow try to figure out and solve.
Sometimes there is hype and some projects gets more money than they deserve, look at leo and look at binance early IEO ones and you see they were hyped and got more than they deserve, on top of that look at previously on 2017 peak times, projects got funded in billions total and not many of them became good. So long story short, how it is offered is not the issue, the projects itself are the real problems we have to somehow try to figure out and solve.
I never invested yet in these types of projects, but I would say that whatever models of projects comes out in the future, whether it'd be ICO 2.0, IEO 2.0 or even STO 2.0, these wouldn't be the best indicator for good projects anyway. It is seemingly just narrowing the possibility of scams like IEOs wherein the devs need to comply first on the requirements that the exchange needs from them before listing of the coin would be possible. If they can still list their coins, but the project itself is just like one of those projects that gives shitcoins, it is just like the 99% of scam ICOs that people told you.
Well, this might not depend on the type of sales, but the concept and quality of the project itself. honestly don't care if it's ICO, IEO, or STO if the projects they make are really high quality, I think people will be interested. however, I would rather choose IEO in sales, because until now, I rarely hear that STO can be as successful as IEO.
The bounty project I'm promoting is STO project that many knew they fails alot but I'm not that bothered because this project is trying to deliver something entirely fresh, it win the best startup project of 2019 and I can't wait to see how far this project will go
Jump to: