Author

Topic: Answer the question above with a question. - page 236. (Read 656153 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
But in a capitalist crypto environment, can one truly be responsible for one's own actions?
If not then crypto will die because failure to take personal responsibility for one's actions will lead to centralised control in the hands of the elite, don't you see?
When it comes to money, since it is the will of all other market players that defines our alternatives and the consequences of our choices, can we meaningfully say that we have free will and are responsible for our own actions?

Of course; why not?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
But in a capitalist crypto environment, can one truly be responsible for one's own actions?
If not then crypto will die because failure to take personal responsibility for one's actions will lead to centralised control in the hands of the elite, don't you see?
When it comes to money, since it is the will of all other market players that defines our alternatives and the consequences of our choices, can we meaningfully say that we have free will and are responsible for our own actions?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
Can I try?

That's up to you, isn't it?
Is it?

If not up to you, who do suggest take responsibility for your actions?
But in a capitalist crypto environment, can one truly be responsible for one's own actions?

If not then crypto will die because failure to take personal responsibility for one's actions will lead to centralised control in the hands of the elite, don't you see?
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003
Kobocoin - Mobile Money for Africa
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
Can I try?

That's up to you, isn't it?
Is it?

If not up to you, who do suggest take responsibility for your actions?
But in a capitalist crypto environment, can one truly be responsible for one's own actions?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
Can I try?

That's up to you, isn't it?
Is it?

If not up to you, who do suggest take responsibility for your actions?
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003
Kobocoin - Mobile Money for Africa
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
Can I try?

That's up to you, isn't it?
Is it?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
Can I try?

That's up to you, isn't it?
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003
Kobocoin - Mobile Money for Africa
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
Can I try?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?

I don't know but think someone should try, don't you?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
How can one even attempt to answer this?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Who is to ask why you should not?

Well, I do not make decisions for nor control others so I don't know and why should I?
hero member
Activity: 1582
Merit: 759
Who is to ask why you should not?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
It already is, isn't it?
And aren't you right on spot?

I think so but what do others think?
Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i?

God that you are because if you wern't, you should be and so should others, don't you think?
What do you think of this suggestion?


Flibberrty-Jibberty is what I think and why should I not?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500
I like boobies
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
It already is, isn't it?
And aren't you right on spot?

I think so but what do others think?
Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i?

God that you are because if you wern't, you should be and so should others, don't you think?
What do you think of this suggestion?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
It already is, isn't it?
And aren't you right on spot?

I think so but what do others think?
Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i?

God that you are because if you wern't, you should be and so should others, don't you think?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
It already is, isn't it?
And aren't you right on spot?

I think so but what do others think?
Disagree, but im open for suggestions aren't i?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
It already is, isn't it?
And aren't you right on spot?

I think so but what do others think?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
It already is, isn't it?
And aren't you right on spot?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you?
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?

It already is, isn't it?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Sorry, is it better now?
Nothing changed for me, as I don't have the problem; did things change for you?
Why would I want things to change?
Because anarchy is the future, who wouldn't agree with that?
No one, except perhaps 99.99% of mankind?
But could not .01% control the world just as easily as the 1% does now?
Wouldn't that be ironic, the world under tyrannical rule of a small oligarchy of anarchists?
Jump to: