Topic: Anti-vaxxers not drinking their own urine (Read 336 times)

Anti-Vax Leader Urges Followers to Drink Their Own Urine to Fight COVID
https://www.thedailybeast.com/anti-vax-leader-christopher-key-urges-followers-to-drink-their-own-urine-to-fight-covid-19

‘Drink urine,’ anti-COVID vaccine advocate tells supporters
https://www.kxan.com/news/weird-news/drink-urine-anti-covid-vaccine-advocate-tells-supporters/



Will you do it now?

Doesn't sound like something Tash would have said.  Is that why you presented bare text with no link at all?

If you found that in a link that someone pointed to, I would thank whatever someone provided the link to the text.  This because information which points to something being kind of scammy is itself quite valuable in analyzing that something.  For instance, someone clumsily trying to save their ass with crude non-linked quoted text without context ==> a loser.  But in this case most people already figured that out.

This is what promoting urine therapy looks like:

“The antidote that we have seen now, and we have tons and tons of research, is urine therapy.  OK, and I know to a lot of you this sounds crazy, but guys, God’s given us everything we need.”

I'm not gonna go dig through the most retarded part of the internet to find the video of the guy talking about how drinking your own piss can cure covid, but unless that quote is fake the guy was promoting drinking his own peepee.

Vaccines(mrna) are killing the gut microbiome, the bifidobacterium, losing that is connected to various health issues.

Source: ProgenaBiome, sabine hazan MD

Nope.  That's not what the guy did.  He specifically said he was NOT doing it and was happy that, because he wasn't stupid enough to get the scamdemic gene therapy jab, he didn't have to explore such things.

What he did do was to provide some links to information about the arguments the proponents of urine consumption are making.  That is not AT ALL the same thing as promoting them.  It is real old-school science to avail of ALL of the scientific arguments (and a lot of the non-scientific arguments) and weigh them against other information.  Upon doing so one is perfectly free to reject some, most, or all of the info.

Scientism, on the other hand, is characterized by:  'It's eeew.  It's yuck.  I won't look into anything.'  And also 'It's not reported in the mainstream media as a 'scientific consensus' so it has no merit and is not worth 'learning' about.'

Most people, be they scientismists or otherwise, would consider the treatment of getting someone elses' shit jammed up your own butt-hole to be absurd and not worth looking into.  That's because most people have no idea that colonization of the gut by a wide variety of bacteria is fundamental to how humans are able to acquire food to fuel their bodies.  Upon considering this, 'fecal transplant' is not so ridiculous on it's face.  But it also doesn't make the practice of fecal transplant the be-all-end-all of healthy living, or even necessarily effective.

Employing actual science can shed some light on the questions around fecal transplant (for instance.)  Scientism will never even get you to first base...and that's probably one of the reasons it's popularized for mainstream consumption by 'celebrity-scientists' like Niel deGrasse-Tyson.

Cured a puppy with mange using homeopathy, nutritious meals and essential oils/carrier oil and baths with castille soap.

The US Government just approved a second booster this week.  What are you talking about?

This now combination of threads is mostly just an admission that liberals will believe anything they read so long as they want to believe it. The threads also show that in the face of irrefutable scientific evidence and mountains of supporting data, they will still not admit when they are wrong. Governments including the USA are now banning these “vaccines” and people arguing here about drinking urine are probably scheduling their next booster…

Kinda the point. Except that homeopathy works when used with proper nutrition. There are even accredited schools for learning homeopathy along with nutrition and some medical.

But the point is the money. Pay through the teeth for medical, possibly get a temporary healing, and loads of side effects, along with long term disabilities.  The medical, along with banking, along with the current form of government, are some of the biggest scams that have ever existed.

Or you're drinking your own urine.  Urine is free.

That's true. Also no effects whatsoever, except a smaller bank balance for the poor idiot buying water pills.

Unless of course you are buying one of the many homeopathic bullshit pills which have been found to contain dangerous levels of contaminants such as lead, mercury, or arsenic.

Drinking your own piss is homeopathy, right?

Have you tried any of these recipes?

https://www.plumbworld.co.uk/blog/the-complete-urine-drinkers-cocktail-guide

No side effects to properly administered homeopathy plus good nutrition.

Get your vaccine for free (government paid for) and pay for it with $millions in side effects, and sometimes even death. Money isn't nearly as valuable as your health.

I took a hit on this forum when I made it clear that the pandemic was a scam to print money and pay back the medical industry for the failed Obamacare promises. I never for a second considered getting vaccinated nor have I ever bothered to be tested for this nonsense. It was crystal clear what this was from the beginning and the bootlickers that continue to be brainwashed after all the evidence showing the vaccine is worse than covid should be avoided at the very least. Their opinions should be considered moronic and questioned on a variety of things as a result. Their ego is more important than truth, and they are enemies of mankind.

I am a supporter of evidence-based medicine. This makes me a natural opponent of homeopathy (although nobody canceled the placebo effect and sugary water sometimes really works, but not because it is sweet - but simply because of the patient's belief that it will help). But that does not make me a supporter of covid vaccination, because the evidence for the effectiveness of these vaccines is too vague. Fans of urine therapy puzzle me, but I do not rule out that the placebo effect works here too.

Absolutely. That's why we push vaccines which cost a buck or two, rather than let people get critically unwell and rack up hundreds of thousands in bills. Oh no wait, you are talking complete bullshit as usual.

But don't forget to buy this bottle of homeopathic bullshit water pills for $199.99 plus tax!

If I were a bad guy, I would be right in there with you. But even though I'm not a bad guy, I totally understand your position.

You have a bunch of 'fellows' who think the same way as you, and so you continually talk the batch of you into believing your lies. And you won't even consult the experiments truthfully, but use warped experimentation to produce whatever you want.

What do you want? Money, and a good name, of course. So, you talk the medical lies into continuing as much as possible, so that you get your money, even when it kills loads of innocent people.

Of course, its the stupidity of the lambs that make it so easy for you to continue. But when you find a few people who show you the truth to your face, it's then that you start picking on the people rather than the data and the processes for getting the data.

Del Bigtree of The Highwire fame, has interview at least dozens of professionals linked to the Covid disease and the Covid vaccines in some ways. These professionals have shown exactly the various ways that standard medicine is a lie, especially regarding Covid, and all vaccines. You can find most of The Highwire videos athttps://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ if you are interest.

So now what you say sounds more reasonable, as what you say usually sounds.


I agree.

Not to be blunt, but so what? Anti-vaxxers parrot this all the time - "Well, they had a pre-existing condition!" - as if suffering from some chronic health condition means your life doesn't matter anymore.

Yes, the majority of the deaths were in the older population (although I really wouldn't class 50 as old), and yes, many (but certainly not all) of the younger people in ICU with COVID had pre-existing conditions. None of that made it any easier on their bereaved families or on the hospital staff.

For the reasonable person that you are, I find it quite shocking that you repeat this, which I suppose is what you have seen, but it does not agree with what I have been told by people who work in health care, nor with the statistics.

The first page I get on google:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/

As we can see, the bulk of the problem is concentrated from the age of 50 onwards, and if we were to break it down further I think we could see that the majority of deaths in the 50-64 range are concentrated in the 58-64 range.

When I have talked to people in healthcare and they told me about young people being in the ICU or dying from COVID, the question I asked them was, but were they healthy? Most often they would tell me that they were quite overweight, or that they had a lot of risk factors (smoking, high blood pressure, etc.).

I don't know if when you say "younger than us" it's because you and your colleagues are like 63 years old on average so I would understand better what you are saying.