Topic: Antimatter coin version 0.2.0 - page 2. (Read 3318 times)

i got chuuu

mANT onna peanutbutter cup nice!

the mining serves to make transactions work faster by having an actual blockchain that rewards miners for keeping their clients online and helping make the network secure and fast. it's secondary function is to grow the cap at a very slow pace that takes into account the way alts are produced and accepted.  But yes, more input is required.

yeah no worries - everyone should have a go - ANT looks too anrgy anyhow lol - but you don't probably want a cartoon all the same -

: D

glad to help.

hmm i have to think on this - because I’m not all that smart , but i have streaks of genius sometimes,

yes

 I think there is value in setting a number value for the ANT , but not too high , at a very high point , you start to go back the other way - 1000's is good but not 100k ,
Humans set values based on what they see every day, I spend 20 "dollars" I spend 1000 "dollars" . < the largest proportion of the population sees this way <

as for - the data mining - { to tell you the truth i didn't know there was mining ? } i thought this was a derivative - that is to say its value is derived from the others value -

but in essence an ANT has to exist to exist right - so hmmmm , it makes me think of the shit fight on Etlas2 topic of a consensus block idea.

i have to think .  

but if an ANT is a derivative - the mining is of a secondary nature - but we still have the laws of the market to obey - the velocity , image and perceived value/rarity .


so

Q 1. - yes not into the many 100k < than 10K .

Q 2. much harder - we need more input.

wow you work fast!!   do you mind if i ask the guy who did the new Noirbits icons and logos to give a crack at your idea?

as for people like r3wt, him and his friend have rather scary "trust" levels , and their approach was confrontational rather than helpful. I just ignore them, because this coin although it is still in dev, it kind of brings a new idea.

nice to see your interest. Yes the value is derived by the cumulative value of pledges that will be placed in one account that lists the balances of all the wallets and displays it as a number in selected currencies such as BTC,LTC and maybe later monetary currencies. I think it is a great name and your points are valid. I'm hoping we can get good designs now that i can incorporate into the client now, so that we release a full project that runs smoothly. The list for accepted currencies is limited to currencies listed on cryptsy since they support the most of them. And yes BTC and LTC are included on that list, someone suggested backing with USD and RUR (i think he's russian) but i think that would be difficult to implement unless cryptsy adds support for those currencies.

There was however a physcological hurdle that was highlighted to me... it seems people wont like to over divide their share... say you get a share six months from now... 0.001 and it is worth 0.1 btc... the worth at today's price is high but apparently people want to see larger numbers in their wallet. It was suggested i raise the initial number to 10k~ 100k, then per consequent block reward to 0.0001 for those who leave their client mining. What are your thoughts on this? And since you are a dev also, how would you suggest we clean out the risk of a farm or data mining the crap out of subsequent blocks?

probably needs to  look a bit  more freindly lol -

you know more like r3wt lol


the fans represent all the other backing currencies -

which are also the "ants" legs -

the Ant body represents the value of the Ant which is derived from that decentralized backing.


{hey digitalindusty ,} {yeah...?}  {are you a genius?} {. naa ,} {aw come on , your good at some things ,} {oh yeah don't get me wrong , I know what i'm good at, i'm not down on myself or anything like that ,} {, oh alright then, i just wanted to say , you know , i think you're great,}  {hey man thanks ...., it really made my day. }  < {hey also your talking to yourself } , {oh my bad, i'll keep an eye on that ...} {yeah probably should} ..

wow its getting easier and easier to find the innovative topics , just look for the ones the Bittards are bashing…


I’m in support - I can suggest call it "ANT"

much more descriptive - and people will say i have so many ants - it’s a common word and it will catch on -

also don't underestimate names and psycological symbols - people want to know what an Ant is , becasue they have a human idea in their mind about what an Ant should be.

plus then the symbol becomes simple .

etc etc - more awareness -

one question:

so an Ants value is derived by the backing of those that pledge other currencies to it ?

is there a restriction on the currency list ? or is it open , you say wha tis traded on Cryptsy , does that include BTC and LTC ?

put me down for an Ant ! - {sorry its just what i'm going to call it}

i'll buy in ! - mostly becasue of that angry cunt that was calling it shit lolz

ok, would anyone like to suggest a means of "backing " management that is satisfactory for the majority?

watching you reply to yourself? priceless.

I'm excited to see how this coin plays out! Obe of the few with any real innovation.

true that, i'll keep you guys update. If i don't get any feedback in two hours i'll making the client.

Well there wouldnt be any innovation without people resisting early on.

Any real ideas are welcome, if you are against the idea please raise points that make sense and have an iota of thought in them. We are trying to develop something taht could essentially kill the pump and dump idea so it's understandable that there will be resistance.....hehehe resistance is futile. 

looks like some people already want to jump the experience and go straight to resistance.

This coin is an interesting concepts... I like the idea of backing it with something. I will definetly be watching this thread closely

barwizi, i'm not sure what you are bitching abut. i conceded that point to you in my second post in lieu of your response. i had moved on to your second issue, that it needed to have real accounts(in whatever alt coin) backing it. that isn't placing any limitation other than what is absolutely necessary to insure viability.

economics 101, you can only give something a value when people want it. This idea coin is virtually worthless until people adopt the system. and by setting a buy in price no matter how low or high, it already set value limitations to the coin. Have you invested 100 LTC on any of the recent alts? did you get your money back? have you noticed that even for the new coin, google docs isnt an option anymore? While you are thinking on that, i'll ask you not to call me a bitch. Study first before you speak. What valid point has he raised? The point that i should set a price in any currency for something that has an initial value of zero? my goodness man. Please raise facts or valid ideas that  relate to what we are doing, even setting a buying price opens up opportunities for scammers....which you aare one apparently.. wow. 

fucking childish pussy.

LOL you' re acting like a bitch. r3wt raised a valid point