Yes I did the pencil mod however this is a pain in the ass because the resistors you are looking for are on the opposite end of the hashboard, meaning you have to pull the heatsink off each and every hash board. There are 4 resistors per board you need to mod, so 40 resistors in total. But the grunt work is taking all those screws off the heatsinks. It helps if you have an electric drill with the right hex socket.
If you find a high res photo of the rear end of the S2 blade, I can show you which resistor to pencil. I already put my heatsinks back on.
The stock resistor is around 2.1KOhm, I got it down to 1.5KOhm and the voltage is around 0.70V or so from the stock 0.75V.
However I need to find a stable clock speed because I am getting huge errors.
Topic: Antminer S2 Underclock - page 2. (Read 3350 times)
Right so I have found the correct resistor and managed to get it downvolted to 0.70-0.71Volts from the original 0.75 V.
However its very hard to get it to run stable. At 196 Mhz half of the chips were getting X's.
So I downclocked the frequency to 163Mhz, it hashes but getting lots of rejections and 2% HW errors.
However its very hard to get it to run stable. At 196 Mhz half of the chips were getting X's.
So I downclocked the frequency to 163Mhz, it hashes but getting lots of rejections and 2% HW errors.
Mind taking a pic? I have a couple S2s here that I might tinker with...I can use a soldering iron but i'm not sure what to touch with it
Well done on finding the resistors. In some ways it's quite simple... If the voltage is too low for the frequency you will get too Many HW errors. So you either turn the frequency down some more until they become acceptable or you have to use an eraser on the resistors and redo them with less pencil and a higher voltage.
Have you just done a single board as an experiment or all of them? Also worth rechecking all the voltages if just one of them is too low than that one can cause the HW errors.
Rich
Have you just done a single board as an experiment or all of them? Also worth rechecking all the voltages if just one of them is too low than that one can cause the HW errors.
Rich
Right so I have found the correct resistor and managed to get it downvolted to 0.70-0.71Volts from the original 0.75 V.
However its very hard to get it to run stable. At 196 Mhz half of the chips were getting X's.
So I downclocked the frequency to 163Mhz, it hashes but getting lots of rejections and 2% HW errors.
However its very hard to get it to run stable. At 196 Mhz half of the chips were getting X's.
So I downclocked the frequency to 163Mhz, it hashes but getting lots of rejections and 2% HW errors.
Not sure if the S2 has been done, but a lot of people have done the "Pencil Mod" on the S1, as is said above you have a 40 resistors to modify so a big job. If you search on S1 & pencil Mod you will find plenty of information.
Rich
Rich
I did but the layout is slightly different and there is no schematic online.
Not sure if the S2 has been done, but a lot of people have done the "Pencil Mod" on the S1, as is said above you have a 40 resistors to modify so a big job. If you search on S1 & pencil Mod you will find plenty of information.
Rich
Rich
Just wondering if anyone has tried here to undervolt/underclock their S2 yet?
I've put up a new master cgminer AntS2 firmware in my cgminer-binaries git
of current git cgminer 4.9.1+ modified from the last Bitmain firmware 29-Oct-2014 and including all the changes I did last year
https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer-binaries/tree/master/AntS2
It includes a half speed half power setting in the Miner Configuration->Advanced Settings tab ... which isn't really all that useful, but shows that you probably wont get a better W/GHs lowering it, without hardware changes.
of current git cgminer 4.9.1+ modified from the last Bitmain firmware 29-Oct-2014 and including all the changes I did last year
https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer-binaries/tree/master/AntS2
It includes a half speed half power setting in the Miner Configuration->Advanced Settings tab ... which isn't really all that useful, but shows that you probably wont get a better W/GHs lowering it, without hardware changes.
It would be nice to see how it performs below default clock... Please post settings and firmware that you are running...
If I have time this weekend I will give it a shot. They're just gathering dust right now anyways.
Actually, you reduce resistance. I haven't tested on an S2, but based on my tests on the S1 it should be possible to get 0.8W/GH out of them, board-level.
My understanding is that the S2 is fairly close to the maximum efficiency of the BM1380 ASIC. Most likely there is not much more to be gained by underclocking.
1 watt per GH is about the best this chip can do. Maybe .9 watt with some intensive tweaking of the voltages. Would be very tedious for and S2.
1 watt per GH is about the best this chip can do. Maybe .9 watt with some intensive tweaking of the voltages. Would be very tedious for and S2.
The voltage's can't be altered however. THere is no option in the settings.
You have to "manually" tweak via pencil modding. You add resistance to a feedback circuit in the regulator, hence lowering the voltage. Would have to do this
40 times in the case of a S2. With the S1, only 8 times. This is why it would be tedious.
My understanding is that the S2 is fairly close to the maximum efficiency of the BM1380 ASIC. Most likely there is not much more to be gained by underclocking.
1 watt per GH is about the best this chip can do. Maybe .9 watt with some intensive tweaking of the voltages. Would be very tedious for and S2.
1 watt per GH is about the best this chip can do. Maybe .9 watt with some intensive tweaking of the voltages. Would be very tedious for and S2.
The voltage's can't be altered however. THere is no option in the settings.
My understanding is that the S2 is fairly close to the maximum efficiency of the BM1380 ASIC. Most likely there is not much more to be gained by underclocking.
1 watt per GH is about the best this chip can do. Maybe .9 watt with some intensive tweaking of the voltages. Would be very tedious for and S2.
1 watt per GH is about the best this chip can do. Maybe .9 watt with some intensive tweaking of the voltages. Would be very tedious for and S2.
Yes that's what I meant. The W/GH will always be fixed but the total watts will be lower along with the hashrate when underclocked.
I don't think Antminers downclock like that, at least S1's didn't. The lower you downclocked an S1, the more efficient it became. (higher GH/W ratio) Inversely, the higher you clock, the more inefficient it becomes. Downclocking made a huge difference with S1's as well - it would run at 180GH/s @ 360W (2W/GH) by default, but by downclocking to 140GH/s it would only take 170W. (efficiency of 1.21W/GH)So as long as the S2 downclocks the same as the S1, (which I fully expect) the S2's efficiency will increase as well.
You can underclock it so its less heat/noise but the power consumption will always be fixed since you can't change the voltage
how the heat is reduced if there is the same wattage(you said the same consumption)? it does not make sense
Perhaps what he means to say is the efficiency(W/GH) will always be fixed, not the power consumption.
Yes that's what I meant. The W/GH will always be fixed but the total watts will be lower along with the hashrate when underclocked.
You can underclock it so its less heat/noise but the power consumption will always be fixed since you can't change the voltage
how the heat is reduced if there is the same wattage(you said the same consumption)? it does not make sense
Perhaps what he means to say is the efficiency(W/GH) will always be fixed, not the power consumption.
I have to agree with Amph here. If underclocking reduces the heat output, then the power draw has been reduced. Watts are Watts and it all ends up as heat one way or another. It's also typical for a reduced clock frequency to end up with a reduced power draw. This is all standard ASIC "physics", nothing magic.
It is also true that in many/most ASIC designs a reduced frequency would operate correctly with a reduced voltage. If the manufacturer hasn't the provided a means to adjust voltage, or their design makes that impractical (e.g. a string design), then you don't get as much power savings by simply reducing the clock frequency.
It is also true that in many/most ASIC designs a reduced frequency would operate correctly with a reduced voltage. If the manufacturer hasn't the provided a means to adjust voltage, or their design makes that impractical (e.g. a string design), then you don't get as much power savings by simply reducing the clock frequency.
You can underclock it so its less heat/noise but the power consumption will always be fixed since you can't change the voltage
how the heat is reduced if there is the same wattage(you said the same consumption)? it does not make sense
You can underclock it so its less heat/noise but the power consumption will always be fixed since you can't change the voltage
Jump to: