Pages:
Author

Topic: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread - page 55. (Read 710164 times)

soy
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
Yes but I'm a retired technician and one does what one does.

Just my thinking this .... I believe the updated firmware ALSO updates the PIC firmware and it is this (the PIC firmware) that causes / results in the diminishing hashrate on the newer firmware. If you have a copy of the old firmware, I'd be tempted to extract that hex file from the old firmware and put it in the overlay directory then rebooting (of course, do backup the existing hex file before copying the older one, and that at your own risk!).

Also, repasting, when done, needs to be preceded by a thorough clean and removal of the old paste. Again, just my thinking, but I found that using slightly thicker thermal pads gave better results on the S3's I had than any (recomended) non conductive thermal paste I could lay my hands on.

I don't have a miner open and didn't notice a PIC when I did.  May I ask where is it?
PIC chip is on the control board. I am not sure that is the PIC in the image, as I could not easily / quickly get to the control board (and can not remember whether I actually saw one on the control board), but it surely has one. The image below is from one of the S1 to S3 upgraded rigs that I keep outside so I can run at max with the fans blowing their hardest (aka blue wire hack).

EDIT: the chip shown in the image is NOT the PIC I was refering to, that one is for the ethernet (which it resides next to)

If you SSH into your rig, the hex file resides in /overlay/etc/config and is named miner_pic.hex and I believe this is reflashed every time the rig has a cold / power reboot.

http://s12.postimg.org/l87wy1pm5/WP_000124.jpg



Unfortunately the S3#2 from Pines in Florida having a falling hashrate went thru some testing.  First test I did was swap controller boards and S3#2 still dropped in hashrate.  After more testing I took one of the boards out of the S3#2 and put it in my excellent, which had arrived in an unopened box, S3#1 from Cryptocrane in the mid-west.  With that both miners would drop in hashrate at about the same rate.  I left it like that for quite a while having them restart cgminer at low hashrates then about a month ago put them back the way they were except S3#2's controller was in S3#1 and since I would need reconfigure the settings as the controller has the miner's identity, I left it but it does run S3#1 at 440 rather than 441.  So the dropping hashrate does not track the controller board and its PIC.  Perhaps what you're saying is that the PIC can be tweaked to give a false reading because as is the falling hashrate stays with the original boards on S3#2.

And on another note,  with a cold morning the other day and S3#1 in my living room, I decided to try a higher frequency (for the first time on the miner) and raised the frequency to 237.5M as it is the next step up on this firmware, this instead of propane heat.  It ran fine, no x's for the couple of days I ran it at that 237.5M and got a hashrate up around that of my S3+'s although the S3+ firmware has a frequency available between the 218.75M and 237.5M choices of the S3's.

It warmed up yesterday so I put the frequency back to 218.75M and restarted.  Now my good S3#1 wouldn't come up to 440 any more and was sticking around 435.  I had moved it a little and considered that since it's been running well since putting the boards back to their original miners (except the controllers) and since my dog has a bed in the clear space near the miner, and although I have a layer of cheesecloth filtering the fan intake, perhaps moving it a little caused dust to dislodge and have an effect and that the lower hashrate wasn't the result of some functional change of the hardware or software other than from dust.  So, I just finished opening it and without removing any heatsinks, cleaned out all dust accessible, and there was more than a little.  Right now after reassembly, at 56m1s it's at 441.24GH/s(avg).  Glad hardly covers it as a description of relief on its recovery.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Yes but I'm a retired technician and one does what one does.

Just my thinking this .... I believe the updated firmware ALSO updates the PIC firmware and it is this (the PIC firmware) that causes / results in the diminishing hashrate on the newer firmware. If you have a copy of the old firmware, I'd be tempted to extract that hex file from the old firmware and put it in the overlay directory then rebooting (of course, do backup the existing hex file before copying the older one, and that at your own risk!).

Also, repasting, when done, needs to be preceded by a thorough clean and removal of the old paste. Again, just my thinking, but I found that using slightly thicker thermal pads gave better results on the S3's I had than any (recomended) non conductive thermal paste I could lay my hands on.

I don't have a miner open and didn't notice a PIC when I did.  May I ask where is it?
PIC chip is on the control board. I am not sure that is the PIC in the image, as I could not easily / quickly get to the control board (and can not remember whether I actually saw one on the control board), but it surely has one. The image below is from one of the S1 to S3 upgraded rigs that I keep outside so I can run at max with the fans blowing their hardest (aka blue wire hack).

EDIT: the chip shown in the image is NOT the PIC I was refering to, that one is for the ethernet (which it resides next to)

If you SSH into your rig, the hex file resides in /overlay/etc/config and is named miner_pic.hex and I believe this is reflashed every time the rig has a cold / power reboot.

http://s12.postimg.org/l87wy1pm5/WP_000124.jpg

soy
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
Yes but I'm a retired technician and one does what one does.

Just my thinking this .... I believe the updated firmware ALSO updates the PIC firmware and it is this (the PIC firmware) that causes / results in the diminishing hashrate on the newer firmware. If you have a copy of the old firmware, I'd be tempted to extract that hex file from the old firmware and put it in the overlay directory then rebooting (of course, do backup the existing hex file before copying the older one, and that at your own risk!).

Also, repasting, when done, needs to be preceded by a thorough clean and removal of the old paste. Again, just my thinking, but I found that using slightly thicker thermal pads gave better results on the S3's I had than any (recomended) non conductive thermal paste I could lay my hands on.

I don't have a miner open and didn't notice a PIC when I did.  May I ask where is it?
soy
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.


True, but for a hobby miner that is not concerned with profit I want maximum hash rate at the most stable setting.   Cool

That's exactly why I got the S3+ with the proper firmware,to underclock it very soon   Cool

Got a second one coming in late this week  Wink   At $115 with shipping,bout the only miner I see making ROI in about 3 months or less............

Be looking for a third in a week or 2.Hope to underclock them to about 300-325 watts.


not exactly sure where you got your calculations.. i hate to burst your bubble but with zero electricity costs, running at 225mhz @ 450 ghs it will take 6 to 8 months to roi 115$ @ 0.004877 BTC per day for the next 5 days, then dropping down to 0.004492 a day and then 0.004241 a day, etc

calculating in the next couple diff increases over 5%..



if you OC them, they will make more, but cost more to run.. if you pay for power this isnt always the best idea
there was someone that posted a chart on the s3 and how much less efficient it runs at higher speeds. running the most efficient at around 200mhz




I pay power out of my pocket,as long as I keep to about 1000 watts.I gave up trying to calculate with power deducted,it's incorrect,but the only way I can justify mining anymore...

Just a better way to gain BTC than being gouged at LBTC or going thru an exchange.So with 2 S3's @ $230 @ 900hg=.01 btc per day (approx),I need 1 BTC (atm) to break even=3 months 10 days or thereabouts.

Then I can sell the S3's & MAYBE upgrade to something better........

I gave up my bank account,free banking is not free banking,the fee's were growing & my income was shrinking..........so I work for cash now  Wink

Yes.  Looking at the net hashrate over time versus value of Bitcoin, it looks like mining takes its toll on value.  If the effect is true then when payout halves next year, I'm *guessing* Bitcoin value will increase but not quite 2x, it will be another drop in profit.  But the up to 2x increase in Bitcoin value will be great for anyone holding BTC.  Now if we have to cash in mined BTC to meet electric costs it means that BTC ain't getting saved for that BTC value increase.

Point is that if one is a retiree and paying for power every month without a financial cushion that would allow betting on BTC value increase, it's getting tough.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.


True, but for a hobby miner that is not concerned with profit I want maximum hash rate at the most stable setting.   Cool

That's exactly why I got the S3+ with the proper firmware,to underclock it very soon   Cool

Got a second one coming in late this week  Wink   At $115 with shipping,bout the only miner I see making ROI in about 3 months or less............

Be looking for a third in a week or 2.Hope to underclock them to about 300-325 watts.


not exactly sure where you got your calculations.. i hate to burst your bubble but with zero electricity costs, running at 225mhz @ 450 ghs it will take 6 to 8 months to roi 115$ @ 0.004877 BTC per day for the next 5 days, then dropping down to 0.004492 a day and then 0.004241 a day, etc

calculating in the next couple diff increases over 5%..



if you OC them, they will make more, but cost more to run.. if you pay for power this isnt always the best idea
there was someone that posted a chart on the s3 and how much less efficient it runs at higher speeds. running the most efficient at around 200mhz



I pay power out of my pocket,as long as I keep to about 1000 watts.I gave up trying to calculate with power deducted,it's incorrect,but the only way I can justify mining anymore...

Just a better way to gain BTC than being gouged at LBTC or going thru an exchange.So with 2 S3's @ $230 @ 900hg=.01 btc per day (approx),I need 1 BTC (atm) to break even=3 months 10 days or thereabouts.

Then I can sell the S3's & MAYBE upgrade to something better........

I gave up my bank account,free banking is not free banking,the fee's were growing & my income was shrinking..........so I work for cash now  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.


True, but for a hobby miner that is not concerned with profit I want maximum hash rate at the most stable setting.   Cool

That's exactly why I got the S3+ with the proper firmware,to underclock it very soon   Cool

Got a second one coming in late this week  Wink   At $115 with shipping,bout the only miner I see making ROI in about 3 months or less............

Be looking for a third in a week or 2.Hope to underclock them to about 300-325 watts.


not exactly sure where you got your calculations.. i hate to burst your bubble but with zero electricity costs, running at 225mhz @ 450 ghs it will take 6 to 8 months to roi 115$ @ 0.004877 BTC per day for the next 5 days, then dropping down to 0.004492 a day and then 0.004241 a day, etc

calculating in the next couple diff increases over 5%..



if you OC them, they will make more, but cost more to run.. if you pay for power this isnt always the best idea
there was someone that posted a chart on the s3 and how much less efficient it runs at higher speeds. running the most efficient at around 200mhz

legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.


True, but for a hobby miner that is not concerned with profit I want maximum hash rate at the most stable setting.   Cool

That's exactly why I got the S3+ with the proper firmware,to underclock it very soon   Cool

Got a second one coming in late this week  Wink   At $115 with shipping,bout the only miner I see making ROI in about 3 months or less............

Be looking for a third in a week or 2.Hope to underclock them to about 300-325 watts.

Good plan.  I eventually want to add something like an sp20 to my little home set up.  I look forward to the next hardware releases so that the sp20's and S5's will cost what the S3 does today (and the S3 like the S1 I guess...).
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.


True, but for a hobby miner that is not concerned with profit I want maximum hash rate at the most stable setting.   Cool

That's exactly why I got the S3+ with the proper firmware,to underclock it very soon   Cool

Got a second one coming in late this week  Wink   At $115 with shipping,bout the only miner I see making ROI in about 3 months or less............

Be looking for a third in a week or 2.Hope to underclock them to about 300-325 watts.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.


True, but for a hobby miner that is not concerned with profit I want maximum hash rate at the most stable setting.   Cool
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.

at this point in time, someone should figure out a way to undervolt and underclock these things instead of trying to overclock them.

they are near the end of their profitability.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Well if it's right in the gui like that it will be way easier to set than on my S1, thanks.

I'll keep looking for a performance summary, bound to be 9ne posted around here somewhere.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
I'm buying S3+'s from ebay & I ask about the under/overclocking myself.I finally found one that does:



Some do & some don't,as far as I know & I believe it's the firmware that makes the difference.

Not sure where in the GUI it shows the firmware #,but I'll share what mine has if I can find it  Wink

Mine say's "Fri Jan 9 20:41:34 CST 2015",is that the firmware ID,by date Huh

Kernel version "3.10.12"..................
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Would someone be able to save me 400+ pages of this thread and point me to S3+ overclocking directions?  I'm assuming you have to ssh in like the S1?

Also, if there are any posts showing various frequencies and associated hash and error rates I'd appreciate seeing that as well.

Thank you.

On a new firmware it's in the login area. On older firmware, check out the first page of this thread.

I think it would be better if someone did or can list all the work utility numbers they are getting for each freq, and difficulty set(poolside).

I'm getting 7040.7/m for work utility currently at the highest 250mhz, on probably the oldest firmware at a 512 diff.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Would someone be able to save me 400+ pages of this thread and point me to S3+ overclocking directions?  I'm assuming you have to ssh in like the S1?

Also, if there are any posts showing various frequencies and associated hash and error rates I'd appreciate seeing that as well.

Thank you.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Yes but I'm a retired technician and one does what one does.

Just my thinking this .... I believe the updated firmware ALSO updates the PIC firmware and it is this (the PIC firmware) that causes / results in the diminishing hashrate on the newer firmware. If you have a copy of the old firmware, I'd be tempted to extract that hex file from the old firmware and put it in the overlay directory then rebooting (of course, do backup the existing hex file before copying the older one, and that at your own risk!).

Also, repasting, when done, needs to be preceded by a thorough clean and removal of the old paste. Again, just my thinking, but I found that using slightly thicker thermal pads gave better results on the S3's I had than any (recomended) non conductive thermal paste I could lay my hands on.
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Yes but I'm a retired technician and one does what one does.

difficulty is going up and time is running out for the s3..
if it were me id set it to 225 or whatever speed and try to leave it running a constant as possible..

soy
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
Yes but I'm a retired technician and one does what one does.
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Has anybody found a fix for falling hashrate on some S3's?  

The miners I bought from Bitmain directly don't fade in hashrate (two S3+'s, two C1's and an S5) and the first S3 I bought from Cryptocrane on Amazon has been great and arrived in an unopened box an doesn't fade.  The S3 I bought from Pines in Florida on Amazon has been ratty and arrived in an open box opened at the bottom and carelessly closed.  When I saw it functioned poorly I re-pasted but found that both hashboards had already been re-pasted (if the pasting technique found on the first S3 was the norm).  I do believe the hashboards on the S3 from Pines in Florida had been removed perhaps by grasping the PCIE connectors and indelicately forcing the hashboards off the heatsinks.

I cleared an x on chain 2 ASIC 16 yesterday by re-applying the thermal paste on the front after carefully cleaning with a brush and solvent.  That x does not reappear.  

Problem is the usual falling hashrate at stock frequency without x's or dashes appearing.

2hrs; 443.19; amb. temp. 72°; watts at the wall 387w
4hrs; 441.12; amb. temp. 67°; watts at the wall 361w
5hrs; 434.01; amb. temp. 65°; watts at the wall 358w
7hrs; 427.40; amb. temp. 63°; watts at the wall 360w

The falling temperatures as day passed into night should have improved operation and there was less wattage used indicating fewer logic errors from for instance impurities outputting electrons striking/firing transistor gates inappropriately but yet the hashrate fell.

When I was troubleshooting failed SMT boards, the senior tech and I disagreed often.  Aside from regional differences, I'm not native to this area, he had no real troubleshooting skills and was the only tech allowed to run the SMT machine.  We both would troubleshoot boards.  I understood most of the circuits (excluding massive LSI chips) and did troubleshoot at a chip level while he would slather liquid flux on the components that usually fail and reflow solder on many, many components - this while not trying to understand the circuit operation.  I would often get boards he had no luck with.

I suspect I may have to try his technique, at least on the upper exposed voltage regulator circuitry.  Just ordered some liquid flux.  If the problems are at the ASIC level, I can only expect to bake the boards with the ASICs exposed and the rest covered but I've no plans to do that anytime soon.  Has anyone tried this with these?

Thanks.

soy








Just write a cron job so the miner will reboot every 2 hours.

I have it rebooting with a script found early in this thread but with some mods.  Still, it's not right and when the flux gets here I'll try and fix it if I'm not busy with something else.

Actually I don't have it rebooting but essentially this command is run" /etc/init.d/cgminer stop && sleep 2 && /etc/init.d/cgminer start ".  This doesn't work forever of course as something like errors build up.

I have it set to run cg.sh at 421GH/s

I put it in last night.  It echos restart to a file.  In that file is:

ran cg.sh at 2015-03-30-04-30-04 because avg hashrate: 420
ran cg.sh at 2015-08-30-04-30-04 because avg hashrate: 4
ran cg.sh at 2015-03-30-16-30-04 because avg hashrate: 417

It runs every hour on the half hour.  I manually shut it down mid-day today to try a test: I stopped the cron 3 minute repetition because it restarts cgminer if cgminer is stopped but not sure when that 3 minutes times out relative to my needs - and I wantedto try hashing stopped for some additional minutes with the fan running to cool it down some, then after a timeout, restarted cgminer hoping it would show lower power usage and quicker return to a reasonable hashrate.  Had to go out so really didn't get handle if it's worth stopping hashing for some minutes versus just stopping and starting cgminer.



i dont want to be that guy but..

the time you are spending with the machine off and rebooting is probably doing you more harm in payouts then the slower hash speeds.
soy
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
Has anybody found a fix for falling hashrate on some S3's?  

The miners I bought from Bitmain directly don't fade in hashrate (two S3+'s, two C1's and an S5) and the first S3 I bought from Cryptocrane on Amazon has been great and arrived in an unopened box an doesn't fade.  The S3 I bought from Pines in Florida on Amazon has been ratty and arrived in an open box opened at the bottom and carelessly closed.  When I saw it functioned poorly I re-pasted but found that both hashboards had already been re-pasted (if the pasting technique found on the first S3 was the norm).  I do believe the hashboards on the S3 from Pines in Florida had been removed perhaps by grasping the PCIE connectors and indelicately forcing the hashboards off the heatsinks.

I cleared an x on chain 2 ASIC 16 yesterday by re-applying the thermal paste on the front after carefully cleaning with a brush and solvent.  That x does not reappear.  

Problem is the usual falling hashrate at stock frequency without x's or dashes appearing.

2hrs; 443.19; amb. temp. 72°; watts at the wall 387w
4hrs; 441.12; amb. temp. 67°; watts at the wall 361w
5hrs; 434.01; amb. temp. 65°; watts at the wall 358w
7hrs; 427.40; amb. temp. 63°; watts at the wall 360w

The falling temperatures as day passed into night should have improved operation and there was less wattage used indicating fewer logic errors from for instance impurities outputting electrons striking/firing transistor gates inappropriately but yet the hashrate fell.

When I was troubleshooting failed SMT boards, the senior tech and I disagreed often.  Aside from regional differences, I'm not native to this area, he had no real troubleshooting skills and was the only tech allowed to run the SMT machine.  We both would troubleshoot boards.  I understood most of the circuits (excluding massive LSI chips) and did troubleshoot at a chip level while he would slather liquid flux on the components that usually fail and reflow solder on many, many components - this while not trying to understand the circuit operation.  I would often get boards he had no luck with.

I suspect I may have to try his technique, at least on the upper exposed voltage regulator circuitry.  Just ordered some liquid flux.  If the problems are at the ASIC level, I can only expect to bake the boards with the ASICs exposed and the rest covered but I've no plans to do that anytime soon.  Has anyone tried this with these?

Thanks.

soy








Just write a cron job so the miner will reboot every 2 hours.

I have it rebooting with a script found early in this thread but with some mods.  Still, it's not right and when the flux gets here I'll try and fix it if I'm not busy with something else.

Actually I don't have it rebooting but essentially this command is run" /etc/init.d/cgminer stop && sleep 2 && /etc/init.d/cgminer start ".  This doesn't work forever of course as something like errors build up.

I have it set to run cg.sh at 421GH/s. 

Also, we had a power outage in heavy rain sometime last night which probably explains the hashrate of 4.

I put it in last night.  It echos restart to a file.  In that file is:

ran cg.sh at 2015-03-30-04-30-04 because avg hashrate: 420
ran cg.sh at 2015-08-30-04-30-04 because avg hashrate: 4
ran cg.sh at 2015-03-30-16-30-04 because avg hashrate: 417

It runs every hour on the half hour.  I manually shut it down mid-day today to try a test: I stopped the cron 3 minute repetition because it restarts cgminer if cgminer is stopped but not sure when that 3 minutes times out relative to my needs - and I wantedto try hashing stopped for some additional minutes with the fan running to cool it down some, then after a timeout, restarted cgminer hoping it would show lower power usage and quicker return to a reasonable hashrate.  Had to go out so really didn't get handle if it's worth stopping hashing for some minutes versus just stopping and starting cgminer.

legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Has anybody found a fix for falling hashrate on some S3's? 

The miners I bought from Bitmain directly don't fade in hashrate (two S3+'s, two C1's and an S5) and the first S3 I bought from Cryptocrane on Amazon has been great and arrived in an unopened box an doesn't fade.  The S3 I bought from Pines in Florida on Amazon has been ratty and arrived in an open box opened at the bottom and carelessly closed.  When I saw it functioned poorly I re-pasted but found that both hashboards had already been re-pasted (if the pasting technique found on the first S3 was the norm).  I do believe the hashboards on the S3 from Pines in Florida had been removed perhaps by grasping the PCIE connectors and indelicately forcing the hashboards off the heatsinks.

I cleared an x on chain 2 ASIC 16 yesterday by re-applying the thermal paste on the front after carefully cleaning with a brush and solvent.  That x does not reappear. 

Problem is the usual falling hashrate at stock frequency without x's or dashes appearing.

2hrs; 443.19; amb. temp. 72°; watts at the wall 387w
4hrs; 441.12; amb. temp. 67°; watts at the wall 361w
5hrs; 434.01; amb. temp. 65°; watts at the wall 358w
7hrs; 427.40; amb. temp. 63°; watts at the wall 360w

The falling temperatures as day passed into night should have improved operation and there was less wattage used indicating fewer logic errors from for instance impurities outputting electrons striking/firing transistor gates inappropriately but yet the hashrate fell.

When I was troubleshooting failed SMT boards, the senior tech and I disagreed often.  Aside from regional differences, I'm not native to this area, he had no real troubleshooting skills and was the only tech allowed to run the SMT machine.  We both would troubleshoot boards.  I understood most of the circuits (excluding massive LSI chips) and did troubleshoot at a chip level while he would slather liquid flux on the components that usually fail and reflow solder on many, many components - this while not trying to understand the circuit operation.  I would often get boards he had no luck with.

I suspect I may have to try his technique, at least on the upper exposed voltage regulator circuitry.  Just ordered some liquid flux.  If the problems are at the ASIC level, I can only expect to bake the boards with the ASICs exposed and the rest covered but I've no plans to do that anytime soon.  Has anyone tried this with these?

Thanks.

soy








Just write a cron job so the miner will reboot every 2 hours.
Pages:
Jump to: