Pages:
Author

Topic: Any results for RX 6900 XT ? (Read 1317 times)

legendary
Activity: 1766
Merit: 1002
December 19, 2020, 10:58:45 AM
#52
tested MSI 6900XT today - does 58-61MHs at stock clocks @ 230watt (gpu) on various miners. costed 1100$
evga ftw3 3090 does 107MHs stock clocks @ 300-320watt (gpu) costs 2100$
damn 2100$ thats hevty price to fueling the curiosity, 6900xt sadly more power than vega series at your result

hope the real value will come up soon for new miner still on progress, new architect infinite cache should run above the hype

we all know amd always favor to miner, even right now they good at gaming  Grin
legendary
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7849
'The right to privacy matters'
December 17, 2020, 11:03:42 PM
#51
I dont know what you do with yopur gpu-s but i have around 35 rx 570 for 3 or 4 years now and i had to send 1 back because of failing fans. Pozdrav


And you think you represent every miner out there?

Maybe this guy is closer to average?

https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/9134/2-cards-dead-after-1-2-weeks-of-mining

he may be a i am clocking the gear as high as i can . why not i have a warranty .

he and any gpu card miner that does that is doing me a favor.

I under clock 🕰 have under 3% failure rate. I am still mining all 1080tis I had about 45 of them.

1 failed dont know why got an rma still working.
2 had bad fans replaced them.
all others still work as I ran them at low watts.

just sold a few of the blower cards.

most of my instance rmas were asus dual cards. they just would not post from the getgo on four different rigs.


jr. member
Activity: 113
Merit: 4
December 17, 2020, 10:26:03 PM
#50
I can only speak from my experience Branko but if you think 2 or 3 out of 6 gpus fail under warranty because of mining i think you are way off, generally these gpus are undervolted core underclocked and have a slight memory overclock, i think a gaming gpu thats overclocked for performance has a better chance of failing, although truth is the mining gpus do more hours powered on.
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 100
To Hash or not to Hash, that's what the question
December 17, 2020, 08:26:55 PM
#49
tested MSI 6900XT today - does 58-61MHs at stock clocks @ 230watt (gpu) on various miners. costed 1100$
evga ftw3 3090 does 107MHs stock clocks @ 300-320watt (gpu) costs 2100$
sr. member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 318
December 17, 2020, 06:19:29 PM
#48
I dont know what you do with yopur gpu-s but i have around 35 rx 570 for 3 or 4 years now and i had to send 1 back because of failing fans. Pozdrav


And you think you represent every miner out there?

Maybe this guy is closer to average?

https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/9134/2-cards-dead-after-1-2-weeks-of-mining
jr. member
Activity: 113
Merit: 4
December 17, 2020, 05:59:07 PM
#47
I dont know what you do with yopur gpu-s but i have around 35 rx 570 for 3 or 4 years now and i had to send 1 back because of failing fans. Pozdrav
sr. member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 318
December 17, 2020, 03:49:35 AM
#46
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs

Safe to assume depending if they keep the 256bit bus or go for the 192bit bus like the 5600xt.

That would be super lousy of them if they decrease to 192 bit.

They have cache, they will go for lower binned memory for maximum profit on their side while that cache keeps up in gaming, amd is focused on gaming, not mining this time.

yep 192bits. so it will be around 50mhs?
https://www.igorslab.de/en/amd-radeon-rx-6700-xt-as-a-real-time-beat-monster-exclusive-leaks-first-board-partner-biose-sample-beat-rates-and-tgp/
 it is very stupid from AMD because gamer will buy 1 card but miner will get min 6cards.

But miner will bug them with 3 out of 6 dead inside warranty period
member
Activity: 1196
Merit: 26
December 17, 2020, 03:41:51 AM
#45
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs

Safe to assume depending if they keep the 256bit bus or go for the 192bit bus like the 5600xt.

That would be super lousy of them if they decrease to 192 bit.

They have cache, they will go for lower binned memory for maximum profit on their side while that cache keeps up in gaming, amd is focused on gaming, not mining this time.

yep 192bits. so it will be around 50mhs?
https://www.igorslab.de/en/amd-radeon-rx-6700-xt-as-a-real-time-beat-monster-exclusive-leaks-first-board-partner-biose-sample-beat-rates-and-tgp/
 it is very stupid from AMD because gamer will buy 1 card but miner will get min 6cards.
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
December 16, 2020, 10:54:30 AM
#44
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs

Safe to assume depending if they keep the 256bit bus or go for the 192bit bus like the 5600xt.

That would be super lousy of them if they decrease to 192 bit.

They have cache, they will go for lower binned memory for maximum profit on their side while that cache keeps up in gaming, amd is focused on gaming, not mining this time.
member
Activity: 145
Merit: 10
December 15, 2020, 05:34:13 PM
#43
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs

Safe to assume depending if they keep the 256bit bus or go for the 192bit bus like the 5600xt.

That would be super lousy of them if they decrease to 192 bit.

so far all signs point to 192bit https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-6700.c3716
jr. member
Activity: 121
Merit: 2
December 15, 2020, 05:00:16 PM
#42
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs

Safe to assume depending if they keep the 256bit bus or go for the 192bit bus like the 5600xt.

That would be super lousy of them if they decrease to 192 bit.
member
Activity: 449
Merit: 24
December 15, 2020, 03:11:01 PM
#41
If I buy any more cards I will stick with the 3000 series.  My 5700 and 5600 cards are efficient but some can be hard to keep running, you never know what you will get.  I have 5000 series rigs that run months at a time and some reboot a couple times a day.  I just had a 5700 than ranf for over a year start crashing the rig and had to remove the card. 
full member
Activity: 1123
Merit: 136
December 15, 2020, 02:50:58 PM
#40
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs

Safe to assume depending if they keep the 256bit bus or go for the 192bit bus like the 5600xt.
member
Activity: 1196
Merit: 26
December 15, 2020, 02:31:48 PM
#39
Since all these 6000 series giving same hashrate can we count on upcoming rx 6700  Grin i mean for cheaper same 60mhs
newbie
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
December 15, 2020, 01:39:16 PM
#38
the video shows that there´s a bug with reported hashrate....but that´s a different thing than the smart access memory and the 2 mining instances when using a AMD 5000 series CPU. that´s 2 totally different things !
sr. member
Activity: 381
Merit: 251
December 11, 2020, 03:38:11 AM
#37
Thanks for the update. We are now able to close this chapter.

I was able to replicate it. I can consistently do it if I change sequence settings + enable/disable renderer in Adobe Premiere. I let it run to a pool and have confirmed, its a false positive. They are running at 65mh, not 87mh. Here is the video showing all of that in 3 minutes.

https://youtu.be/viSrcMcWwtU
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
December 11, 2020, 02:12:52 AM
#36
The good thing is that he was honest to the very end...

I believe you should have said: "you were honest to the very end", since user @alumar is BBT Carter himself  Grin He is, as RedPandaMining likes to say, "our lord and savior, the OG techtuber miner".

I wish I could, unless he explicit tells on his channel on youtube that he goes by the username "alumar" on bitcointalk then I will believe, too many impersonators.
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 41
December 11, 2020, 01:53:38 AM
#35
The good thing is that he was honest to the very end...

I believe you should have said: "you were honest to the very end", since user @alumar is BBT Carter himself  Grin He is, as RedPandaMining likes to say, "our lord and savior, the OG techtuber miner".
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
December 10, 2020, 07:00:47 PM
#34
I was able to replicate it. I can consistently do it if I change sequence settings + enable/disable renderer in Adobe Premiere. I let it run to a pool and have confirmed, its a false positive. They are running at 65mh, not 87mh. Here is the video showing all of that in 3 minutes.

https://youtu.be/viSrcMcWwtU

The good thing is that he was honest to the very end, so it is confirmed it was a bug, 6800 or 6900 both have equal hashrate, so that means cache does not help with eth mining at moment, might help on other algos, it needs to be tested. Thanks for the link.
full member
Activity: 208
Merit: 117
December 10, 2020, 06:19:20 PM
#33
I was able to replicate it. I can consistently do it if I change sequence settings + enable/disable renderer in Adobe Premiere. I let it run to a pool and have confirmed, its a false positive. They are running at 65mh, not 87mh. Here is the video showing all of that in 3 minutes.

https://youtu.be/viSrcMcWwtU
Pages:
Jump to: