Pages:
Author

Topic: Any wisdom on optimizing 6970's? - page 3. (Read 4663 times)

hero member
Activity: 642
Merit: 500
January 22, 2012, 02:10:39 AM
#13
So.. you're saying a newer version of atiflash is all I need now?

I believe so.  Took care of it for me.
hero member
Activity: 535
Merit: 500
January 21, 2012, 06:55:22 PM
#12
Thank you all very much and I had seen some of your posts sveetsnelda which is why I decided to buy these. I got them for a good price and in the end, they do have good resale as solid gaming cards.

I'm thinking I might have to split the cards into two rigs though, 6 cards just sounds like a headache on one mobo. I have an extra msi 890 FXA-GD70 and a seasonic 750 watt. I'll maybe put three cards on that with a nice 360 rad since the cards came with blocks and then put the other three with a 480 rad I have and try to add a 5870 I have that won't let me control it's fan no matter what i do, bios flash, etc. just easier to handle
I have a seasonic 1250 watt for the 4 card rig also.

Or i could just get a 240 rad for the loop and that would give me a 480 and 240 for the 6 cards which should be fine.

I have the sli fittings for parallel, etc.

will all 6 cards work on an ASUS P8P67 WS motherboard with the right extenders?

So assuming I flash these and get the memclock's down, will this rig work?

ASUS P8P67 WS
6 ATI 6970's with swiftech komodo full waterblocks.
koolance 480 rad with high speed fans (sycthe ultra kaze 3000 rpm)
swiftech mcp 655 pump
swiftech resevoir
240 koolance rad to match i guess, 20 fpi fin density at least(scythe ultra kaze 300 rpm)
seasonic x-1250 gold
i3 2100 cpu, undervolted as much as I can get it
2Gb ram
pci extenders so I can use all the slots on the board.
16GB flash drive running linuxcoin and cgminer.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
January 21, 2012, 06:24:49 PM
#11
...  A bit harsh, but correct.
It's called shock treatment. Just what the doc prescribes to guys with 30 posts under their belt authoritatively stating that a 1500W monster can't pull 950 Watts Smiley
My point wasn't to be harsh and nasty. I needed to stop the disinformation from being spread around.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
January 21, 2012, 04:57:24 PM
#10
Sapphire reference cards. They most definitely need a hardware modification to allow setting memory clock lower. There were some links showing how to do so with some wire and solder and shit and I decided against it <_<
Yeah, the link you're referring to about modification was to override the ROM write protection.  It's actually not enabled on any of the ROMs I've encountered (including the recent Sapphire reference 6970 boards), but the ATIFlash utility couldn't send the correct commands to unlock the ROM to erase it if it was flashed in a particular way.  For example, I had 6 identical XFX 6970s that I had purchased new & sealed from Newegg.  I was able to flash 5 of them successfully but the 6th appeared write locked (which required disassembly and a 1 wire solder).  To make things even more odd was that I could no longer flash any of the 5 cards after they had been flashed once.  I understand why it does it now, but I was originally baffled.  Now that ATIFlash has been fixed, I can flash any of the cards without disassembly.

Think of it this way -- the only way you wouldn't need a hardware modification to set memory clock lower is if they stripped the variable clock generator off of the board.  If they did this though, none of ATI's power management features would work properly (the cards scale the clock back when the card is idle or under low load).  All of the cards would be sucking down significant power at idle.
So.. you're saying a newer version of atiflash is all I need now?
hero member
Activity: 642
Merit: 500
January 21, 2012, 03:16:09 PM
#9
I would expect to burn up your power supply. I have 4 and its at 950 watts. Even with a 1500 watt psu it would be bad. You want to use around 50% of of your power supply to be efficient.
Bullshit.

Yes, you are most efficient at 50% but by no more than 2 or 3% it your PSU is 80+certified.
Any decent 1200-watter will pull 950W at the wall indefinitely.

As to leaving the memory at 1375, God help you. Even with the hardware-limited "core_clk -125MHz" cards you'd easily drop ±20 W per card. Less power, less heat, less PSU load.

^all of this.  A bit harsh, but correct.
hero member
Activity: 642
Merit: 500
January 21, 2012, 03:11:29 PM
#8
Sapphire reference cards. They most definitely need a hardware modification to allow setting memory clock lower. There were some links showing how to do so with some wire and solder and shit and I decided against it <_<
Yeah, the link you're referring to about modification was to override the ROM write protection.  It's actually not enabled on any of the ROMs I've encountered (including the recent Sapphire reference 6970 boards), but the ATIFlash utility couldn't send the correct commands to unlock the ROM to erase it if it was flashed in a particular way.  For example, I had 6 identical XFX 6970s that I had purchased new & sealed from Newegg.  I was able to flash 5 of them successfully but the 6th appeared write locked (which required disassembly and a 1 wire solder).  To make things even more odd was that I could no longer flash any of the 5 cards after they had been flashed once.  I understand why it does it now, but I was originally baffled.  Now that ATIFlash has been fixed, I can flash any of the cards without disassembly.

Think of it this way -- the only way you wouldn't need a hardware modification to set memory clock lower is if they stripped the variable clock generator off of the board.  If they did this though, none of ATI's power management features would work properly (the cards scale the clock back when the card is idle or under low load).  All of the cards would be sucking down significant power at idle.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
January 21, 2012, 07:27:33 AM
#7
I would expect to burn up your power supply. I have 4 and its at 950 watts. Even with a 1500 watt psu it would be bad. You want to use around 50% of of your power supply to be efficient.
Bullshit.

Yes, you are most efficient at 50% but by no more than 2 or 3% it your PSU is 80+certified.
Any decent 1200-watter will pull 950W at the wall indefinitely.

As to leaving the memory at 1375, God help you. Even with the hardware-limited "core_clk -125MHz" cards you'd easily drop ±20 W per card. Less power, less heat, less PSU load.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
January 21, 2012, 06:54:01 AM
#6
Sapphire reference cards. They most definitely need a hardware modification to allow setting memory clock lower. There were some links showing how to do so with some wire and solder and shit and I decided against it <_<

You're most welcome and thanks for donations =)
hero member
Activity: 642
Merit: 500
January 21, 2012, 03:39:48 AM
#5
6970's are just a terrible choice for mining. I wish I never bought mine.

If you set them up properly, they really aren't.  A 5870 is certainly preferred, but they really aren't *that* far off from each other if you do it right.


I just leave the memory at 1375. There was no change in any temperatures when I lowering them. If you are using a good setup they should stay cool anyway.

I dropped 100 watts from a 4 card rig just with dropping the memory clocks to 340Mhz.  That heat has to go somewhere.
hero member
Activity: 642
Merit: 500
January 21, 2012, 03:36:48 AM
#4
I tried flashing the BIOS but the last few generations are hardware limited, not software so it had no effect (this is why I put the gpu-memdiff option in cgminer)

Negative.  The 6970 can have the memory clock changed easily with a BIOS flash.  I have 42 more recent cards all flashed with lower memclock and voltage.  There were problems with atiflash sending the correct commands to a certain ATMEL ROM though.  For a few of the cards, I had to pull them apart and temporarily short 2 pins on the ATMEL to disable write protection while the ROM was flashed.  This ATMEL chip was used on a lot of later 6970s.  Maybe you ran into this problem?  ATIFlash fixed this issue in 3.89:

Code:
Fix issue with flashing Atmel AT25F512B ROMs

With my XFX reference 6970s, I get 1580Mhash @ 683 watts on an OCZ ZX 1250W PSU.  (900Mhz/340Mhz @ 1.050).  They've been stable for months.  If this is a dedicated rig and you underclock the memory/undervolt the core, you can run 6 cards.  Definitely don't do this at stock clock/memory/voltage though.  Your PSU will hate you.


Totally unrelated -- thanks for CGMiner!  My mining operation would was so much more cumbersome before it existed.  Now that it's scaled up to 40Ghash, it would be a nightmare without it.  In fact, toying around with these 7970s has made me wonder how I dealt with it before.  I've silently tossed some donations your way here and there, but I said nothing because I wasn't looking for recognition.  Thanks for the good work!
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
January 21, 2012, 03:08:27 AM
#3
I would expect to burn up your power supply. I have 4 and its at 950 watts. Even with a 1500 watt psu it would be bad. You want to use around 50% of of your power supply to be efficient. I would recommend using two. I run mine at 950 mhz so I can use the pc without having crashes. 6970's are just a terrible choice for mining. I wish I never bought mine. I just leave the memory at 1375. There was no change in any temperatures when I lowering them. If you are using a good setup they should stay cool anyway.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
January 21, 2012, 02:38:08 AM
#2
I'm also setting up a 6 x 6970 watercooled rig and hope to get some good hash out of it. Can you down clock the memory as easily as the 5 series card in something like cgminer?

What kind of overclocks and hash rates can I expect? What kind of power consumption?

thanks.
My 6970s ran stable between 965 and 1015 engine clock speed depending on the card. Unfortunately, they had that factory limitation of only downclocking the memory 125 Mhz lower than the engine speed. I tried flashing the BIOS but the last few generations are hardware limited, not software so it had no effect (this is why I put the gpu-memdiff option in cgminer). With +20% powertune and engine speeds 15 below mentioned above (I wanted stability), I was getting 400-430 Mh/s. It has been estimated each card run like that would be 280-290 Watts. I ran 4 of them with a (very good) 1250 Watt PSU and no problems.
hero member
Activity: 535
Merit: 500
January 21, 2012, 02:34:14 AM
#1
I'm also setting up a 6 x 6970 watercooled rig and hope to get some good hash out of it. Can you down clock the memory as easily as the 5 series card in something like cgminer?

What kind of overclocks and hash rates can I expect? What kind of power consumption?

thanks.
Pages:
Jump to: