Pages:
Author

Topic: Anybody Use REVERSE Martingale? - page 2. (Read 1412 times)

legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1016
June 13, 2016, 07:34:47 PM
#13
It will still be the house advantage if you try reverse martingale. The reverse martingale is similar to betting x10000 with very small amount, so when you win, you win big. Both methods have been proven to be not effective due to the house edge.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1015
June 13, 2016, 06:26:09 PM
#12
Whatever kind of martingale it is, the result would be the same as normal martingale. Its still a martingale that could make your balance zero. There is no strategy in gambling that could make you win more than you lose unless you got lucky.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
June 13, 2016, 05:50:39 PM
#11
Why would reverse Martingale be more successful than ordinary Martingale? They both bank on the player hitting big streaks.  Hit and run style of betting is the most successful long term. You might not win a lot in a session but at least you won't be bankrupt either.
No strategy is particularly better than the others [considering probability] and thus even hit and run (over a long time) will eventually have the same chance of losing as going all in.

Or perhaps consider this:

You bet $100 on a 1.98x payout, with a 50% chance of winning. The house edge is 1% and takes $1 from you.

You bet $10 ten times on a 1.98x payout, with a 50% chance of winning. The house edge is 1% and takes $0.10 every time you bet [let's say you win every time], which adds up to $1.

It's the same and albeit you may last longer the more you bet the more you give to the house edge.


Let me quote from The Wizard of Odds: "All betting systems are equal to flat betting when compared this way, as they should be. In other words, all betting systems are equally worthless."
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1130
June 13, 2016, 05:47:20 PM
#10
Yup, i did used reverse martingale, but i used it on higher chance (>80%), so i got long streak wins while used that strat. But, this strat  can make you bust too if you let your bets going to higher. So just stop/reset it while you got many greens (maybe 5 wins)
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1048
June 13, 2016, 05:30:13 PM
#9
Yeah I did have some small success in the past but its phychologically hard to keep betting after 7-8 wins in a row. Because you keep thinking you will lose but instead you win.
there no strategy in gambling , we have realize it. keep dreaming to win steady by gamble , it is almost impossible to make it happen as house edge always win , and bookies are smarter than us.

martingale or reverse martingale is just same, will not work to make you win in long run.
member
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
June 13, 2016, 05:29:53 PM
#8
I did and it seemed even worse then martingale. Poof gone in seconds. Over.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001
June 13, 2016, 05:28:07 PM
#7
Why would reverse Martingale be more successful than ordinary Martingale? They both bank on the player hitting big streaks.  Hit and run style of betting is the most successful long term. You might not win a lot in a session but at least you won't be bankrupt either.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
June 13, 2016, 05:23:47 PM
#6
Yeah I did have some small success in the past but its phychologically hard to keep betting after 7-8 wins in a row. Because you keep thinking you will lose but instead you win.
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
June 13, 2016, 03:16:46 PM
#5
What is reverse martingale?

You halve your bet at loss, or something like that?

Its just like martingale , but instead of doubling your bet on a loss, you double on a win. So if your initial bet was 1$, then you would bet 2 on a win, and 4 on another win after that. You would stop at a predecided win streak.

Read up more about it here http://www.roulettestrategy.net/strategy/reverse-martingale/
legendary
Activity: 1073
Merit: 1000
June 13, 2016, 02:59:30 PM
#4
What is reverse martingale?

You halve your bet at loss, or something like that?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 500
June 13, 2016, 02:40:55 PM
#3
I already tried that method reverse method is the same result as normal martingale method.. and i think its always depends in luck not in strategy like that.. i never made any profit with that method.. unless if you can make even a small amount there and you can accept and satisfied what you can make a profit and stop..
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
June 13, 2016, 02:03:21 PM
#2
Well considering that each method does not get you to be +EV, each method would make you lose in the end. Anti-martingale is no different. The only thing that will be different from Martingale is the time it takes for you to go bust.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
June 13, 2016, 01:14:13 PM
#1
I think since using martingale we often run into huge streaks of loss that maybe it will be profitable to use reverse martingale to have a 10-15 doubling win streak. Has anybody used it and what do you think?
Pages:
Jump to: