Appeal Mia_houston - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

FatFork

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 2594

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: tranthidung on August 09, 2022, 06:48:43 PM

Quote from: Mia_houston123 on August 09, 2022, 09:15:21 AM

I'm Mia_houston. I want to an appeal for this account because today my account was banned due to allegations of ban evasion related to the rindo account.

If it is a ban evasion from rindo account, you should start with the account you was banned, not with Mia_houston. If the rindo account was not be given a second chance, Mia_houston will still be banned.

I think she wants us to reconsider the evidence linking her and the "rindo" account. So she did not appeal to the ban of the rindo account, but to the allegation of her ban evading.
But I agree that she should explain her case better and shed light on the evidence that ties the two accounts together.

tranthidung

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 4085

Farewell o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: Mia_houston123 on August 09, 2022, 09:15:21 AM

I'm Mia_houston. I want to an appeal for this account because today my account was banned due to allegations of ban evasion related to the rindo account.

If it is a ban evasion from rindo account, you should start with the account you was banned, not with Mia_houston. If the rindo account was not be given a second chance, Mia_houston will still be banned.

Quote

Please reconsider the evidence reported.

If you make a ban appeal, you should provide evidence of your contribution, to show good net effects for unban. You did not include evidence in this thread.

Autoban for rindo account means chance for it is extremely low but autoban does not mean automatically banned by bot.

Bitcoin_Arena

copper member

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1814

฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.

Quote from: Xal0lex on August 09, 2022, 10:45:15 AM

Quote from: Rizzrack on August 09, 2022, 09:35:00 AM

Also:

Honestly, I didn't expect this from you. Well, you should know about it Wink

In your example, mia_houston published the address much earlier than rindo did. That's why your example doesn't fit. If it were the other way around, then we could talk about ban evasion.

But it still does help to show that the accounts are linked. If it's one case of both accounts publishing the same address, maybe it could just be considered a coincidence or a POA copy-paste mistake gone wrong but if there are many instances then it strengthens the linkage between the accounts.

_BlackStar

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1228

Playgram - The Telegram Casino

Quote from: Xal0lex on August 09, 2022, 10:45:15 AM

Honestly, I didn't expect this from you. Well, you should know about it Wink

In your example, mia_houston published the address much earlier than rindo did. That's why your example doesn't fit. If it were the other way around, then we could talk about ban evasion.

I had reported it last December but after I got your explanation then I forgot about the case and it was lucky enough for mia_houston. But this time, the rhomelmabini got a good catch, very clear evidence that they were ban evasion. Rindo posted a Twitter profile in 2015 ^{[she/ he was banned]} and was then followed by mia_houston in 2016. If in Deember mia_houston was acquitted, then this time it seems not.

Quote from: Mia_houston123 on August 09, 2022, 09:15:21 AM

Please reconsider the evidence reported.

However you have violated the rules on evasion of ban, and as a old user you should know how these rules are enforced. IMO, your odds are not good, this appeal is probably pointless.

Xal0lex

staff

Activity: 2436

Merit: 2347

Quote from: Rizzrack on August 09, 2022, 09:35:00 AM

Also:

Honestly, I didn't expect this from you. Well, you should know about it Wink

In your example, mia_houston published the address much earlier than rindo did. That's why your example doesn't fit. If it were the other way around, then we could talk about ban evasion.

Upgrade00

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 2248

Playgram - The Telegram Casino

There should be an email address in the ban message you received on your main account.
If you have any proof as to why you are not related to the account linked to Mia_houston. Although, with the evidence provided, there's very little chance of the account getting unbanned.

Rizzrack

copper member

Activity: 783

Merit: 710

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

Also:

Quote from: rindo on February 16, 2017, 09:27:31 AM

username : rindo
rank : Hero member
Current post : 2258
BTC address : 15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9

Quote from: yahoo62278 on September 02, 2016, 02:19:35 PM

Denied

Quote from: ?? on ??

Btctalk name : mia_houston
Rank : Full member
Post count : 147
Btc address : 15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9
Wear sig code : Yes

Bitcoin_Arena

copper member

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1814

฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.

This was report about your ban evasion. Perhaps you should start by explaining why the involved accounts used the same Twitter profile links and username. I don't think it was just a mistake

Quote from: rhomelmabini on August 02, 2022, 10:55:16 PM

Reporting ban evasion

rindo Autobanned user
mia_houston Active
wrokefoke101D Inactive

Proof:

Quote from: rindo on October 07, 2015, 08:59:00 AM

https://twitter.com/ahmadriduan14

Quote from: ?? on ??

Followed retweeted tweeted https://twitter.com/ahmadriduan14 [ahmadriduan14]

Archived

spreadsheet link

Quote from: mia_houston on June 08, 2016, 10:19:39 AM

username : hokin

Quote from: wrokefoke101D on January 04, 2017, 09:11:41 AM

username: hokin

Related Addresses:

Code:

username : hokin
https://twitter.com/ahmadriduan14

Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 12:27:51 PM

25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]

Solosanz

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 662

I looked on your main account, there's no topic created by you and you didn't contributed anything except creating a common replies on gambling section. I don't think any moderators will accept your appeal to consider temporary banned on your account.

Edit:

Quote from: Bitcoin_Arena on August 09, 2022, 09:30:50 AM

This was report about your ban evasion. Perhaps you should start by explaining why the involved accounts used the same Twitter profile links and username. I don't think it was just a mistake

Before that, someone already report him but one of the moderator didn't ban him because mia_houston use the address earlier than rindo, but in this case it's different where rindo use the telegram before mia_houston.

Quote from: _BlackStar on January 23, 2022, 10:07:22 AM

Can any one of you explain to me why any of these users are not banned even though the evidence I have found is valid enough to say they are alt? mia_houston and rindo are alt based on the wallet they used before, rindo has been banned while mia_houston is still active until now. Are there any special considerations why one of these accounts is not banned?

Quote from: _BlackStar on December 25, 2021, 05:03:06 AM

Ban Evasion, please review this catch.

Well, if some of you find a lot of newbie or other low ranking members doing ban evasion, then this time I found a hero member who did it. Maybe the mod or admin needs to check the evidence I showed before ban the second account that is still actively posting.

1. rindo ^[Archived]
2. mia_houston

Proof:

Quote from: rindo on March 11, 2017, 11:43:17 PM

1. Username : rindo
2. Rank : Hero Member
3. Number of Post : 2299
4. Bitcoin address : 15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9

Quote from: ?? on ??

Btctalk name : mia_houston
Rank : Full member
Post count : 147
Btc address : 15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9
Wear sig code : Yes

The above two accounts used the same wallet to join different campaign in the past.

Code:

15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9

Quote from: Xal0lex on January 23, 2022, 11:08:02 AM

Because in your example, mia_houston used the address earlier than rindo. If were the other way around, then we could talk about ban evasion. Plus, the mia_houston post you refer to in your example has been deleted.

Mia_houston123

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

I'm Mia_houston. I want to an appeal for this account because today my account was banned due to allegations of ban evasion related to the rindo account. Please reconsider the evidence reported.

Link profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/miahouston-814560

Topic: Appeal Mia_houston - page 2. (Read 662 times)