Pages:
Author

Topic: Are bitcoin based securities illegal? - page 2. (Read 2294 times)

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
October 09, 2012, 06:35:10 AM
#9
How many EVE Online ponzi operators have been jailed for what they did in EVE Online?

-MarkM-


Probably none. have there been any diablo gold ponzis ?

Bitcoin isnt even money its a distributed ledger. Its not money simply because money is debt.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
October 09, 2012, 06:25:18 AM
#8
How many EVE Online ponzi operators have been jailed for what they did in EVE Online?

-MarkM-
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
October 09, 2012, 06:24:22 AM
#7

The two interesting passages to me are one, "Issuers whose activities go beyond selling their own securities, however, need to consider whether they would need to register as broker-dealers. This includes issuers that purchase their securities from investors, as well as issuers that effectively operate markets in their own securities or in securities whose features or terms can change or be altered."

and two, "In addition, foreign broker-dealers that, from outside of the United States, induce or attempt to induce securities transactions by any person in the United States, or that use the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce of the United States for this purpose, also must register. This includes the use of the internet to offer securities, solicit securities transactions, or advertise investment services to U.S. persons."

To me this seems to mean that operating the GLBSE or listing assets would only be illegal if you were physically located in the USA. Of course, the US has laws which prohibit it's citizens from committing crimes while they are abroad; but if you're not a US citizen and not physically present in the USA, it seems that the only way to be guilty of a crime is to sell secutiries to people living in the USA.

Opinions/comments?

You'd only be guilty of an offence regulated by the SEC if you sold securities to someone in the USA (or were in the USA yourself).  If you sell to someone in a different country then it's the laws of that country (and your own) which apply.  Note that it's "in the USA" not "living in the USA" (which you said) - non-residents (visitors) are also covered.

Obviously if you aren't in the US and don't sell to individuals in the US then the SEC rules are totally irrelevant.  The laws in the UK (where I am and GLBSE are) on this happen to be very similar to the ones in the US - and you'll find very similar laws in most major economies.

Your last paragraph reads as though you believe the SEC has some global mandate - it doesn't.  Start with the laws of your own country to see what's legal there: I have no idea what Chinese law is on this (Believe you're in China as one of your posts included "Here in China..").
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
October 09, 2012, 06:12:51 AM
#6
Why is there a stock exchange in second life that has securities on it and the SEC hasnt sent linde labs to jail for 20 years ?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
October 09, 2012, 06:11:17 AM
#5
Trading an unlicensed security for value is illegal. Question is, do Bitcoins have value?

What if you sell glbse tokens for bitcoin and these tokens have no value but there is an exchange somewhere that trades them back to bitcoin off glbse itself? What if you create a version of bitcoin created by a private company and in their tos it says the cryptocurrency has no value and yet people still trade it ala linden dollars ?
The moment someone is willing to pay/trade something with value for something without value, the thing without value has value.
If I'm willing to pay 10 euro for an empty bottle of air, that bottle of air has a value of 10 euro. Maybe I don't have enough euro's to buy all bottle's of air, but when I still have enough euro's to buy one bottle more, all bottle's have the potential value of 10 euro.

No it doesnt. If I create a site and use shitcoins and someone else buys and sells them on ebay they still have no value because there is no company or state that you can redeem them for anything. They are worth 0 according to the laws.

hero member
Activity: 1596
Merit: 502
October 09, 2012, 06:06:16 AM
#4
Trading an unlicensed security for value is illegal. Question is, do Bitcoins have value?

What if you sell glbse tokens for bitcoin and these tokens have no value but there is an exchange somewhere that trades them back to bitcoin off glbse itself? What if you create a version of bitcoin created by a private company and in their tos it says the cryptocurrency has no value and yet people still trade it ala linden dollars ?
The moment someone is willing to pay/trade something with value for something without value, the thing without value has value.
If I'm willing to pay 10 euro for an empty bottle of air, that bottle of air has a value of 10 euro. Maybe I don't have enough euro's to buy all bottle's of air, but when I still have enough euro's to buy one bottle more, all bottle's have the potential value of 10 euro.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
October 09, 2012, 06:01:00 AM
#3
Trading an unlicensed security for value is illegal. Question is, do Bitcoins have value?

What if you sell glbse tokens for bitcoin and these tokens have no value but there is an exchange somewhere that trades them back to bitcoin off glbse itself? What if you create a version of bitcoin created by a private company and in their tos it says the cryptocurrency has no value and yet people still trade it ala linden dollars ? Technically once bitcoins become database coins they are no longer bitcoins.

GLBSE also didnt operate a currency exchange so you cant exchange bitcoins for real money.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 504
Decent Programmer to boot!
October 09, 2012, 05:55:37 AM
#2
Trading an unlicensed security for value is illegal. Question is, do Bitcoins have value?
vip
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
13
October 09, 2012, 05:50:30 AM
#1
While I can comprehend the idea that "unregistered securities" are "illegal" in the United States and the UK, the question here is what happens when you are not operating in one of those jurisdictions but instead you are on the internet, and/or in another country. For example, chewing gum in public might be illegal in Singapore, but they will hardly extradite a Jamaican natural living in France all the way to Singapore to put you on trial for chewing gum.

Before anyone panics and says "we're all doomed!" the SEC regulations provide a remedy:

If you are already engaged in the business and are not yet registered, you should cease all activities until you are properly registered.

So right off the top, if you/me anyone simply stops post haste, once being made aware of the legal status of what you are doing, you should be fine. This is likely what Nefario was told and what he did (although that is speculation on my part).

The question is, then, is it? Is this illegal? And if so, where? As for me, I'm not a U.S. citizen and I don't live in the USA. But there are two passages from the SEC regulations which seem to be important which i'd like to quote here for the benefit of my U.S. friends:

-----begin-quote-----
5. Issuer's "Exemption" and Associated Persons of Issuers (Rule 3a4-1)

Issuers generally are not "brokers" because they sell securities for their own accounts and not for the accounts of others. Moreover, issuers generally are not "dealers" because they do not buy and sell their securities for their own accounts as part of a regular business. Issuers whose activities go beyond selling their own securities, however, need to consider whether they would need to register as broker-dealers. This includes issuers that purchase their securities from investors, as well as issuers that effectively operate markets in their own securities or in securities whose features or terms can change or be altered. The so-called issuer's exemption does not apply to the personnel of a company who routinely engage in the business of effecting securities transactions for the company or related companies (such as general partners seeking investors in limited partnerships). The employees and other related persons of an issuer who assist in selling its securities may be "brokers," especially if they are paid for selling these securities and have few other duties.

Exchange Act Rule 3a4-1 provides that an associated person (or employee) of an issuer who participates in the sale of the issuer's securities would not have to register as a broker-dealer if that person, at the time of participation: (1) is not subject to a "statutory disqualification," as defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the Act; (2) is not compensated by payment of commissions or other remuneration based directly or indirectly on securities transactions; (3) is not an associated person of a broker or dealer; and (4) limits its sales activities as set forth in the rule.

Some issuers offer dividend reinvestment and stock purchase programs. Under certain conditions, an issuer may purchase and sell its own securities through a dividend reinvestment or stock purchase program without registering as a broker-dealer. These conditions, regarding solicitation, fees and expenses, and handling of participants' funds and securities, are explained in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35041 (December 1, 1994), 59 FR 63393 ("1994 STA Letter"). Although Regulation M2 replaced Rule 10b-6 and superseded the 1994 STA Letter, the staff positions taken in this letter regarding the application of Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act remain in effect. See 17 CFR 242.102(c) and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38067 (December 20, 1996), 62 FR 520, 532 n.100 (January 3, 1997).

6. Foreign Broker-Dealer Exemption (Rule 15a-6)

The SEC generally uses a territorial approach in applying registration requirements to the international operations of broker-dealers. Under this approach, all broker-dealers physically operating within the United States that induce or attempt to induce securities transactions must register with the SEC, even if their activities are directed only to foreign investors outside of the United States. In addition, foreign broker-dealers that, from outside of the United States, induce or attempt to induce securities transactions by any person in the United States, or that use the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce of the United States for this purpose, also must register. This includes the use of the internet to offer securities, solicit securities transactions, or advertise investment services to U.S. persons. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39779 (March 23, 1998) http://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/33-7516.htm.

Foreign broker-dealers that limit their activities to those permitted under Rule 15a-6 of the Act, however, may be exempt from U.S. broker-dealer registration. Foreign broker-dealers that wish to rely on this exemption should review Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27017 (effective August 15, 1989), 54 FR 30013, to determine whether they meet the conditions of Rule 15a-6. See also letters re: Securities Activities of U.S.-Affiliated Foreign Dealers (April 9 and April 28, 1997). In addition, in April 2005, the Division of Market Regulation staff issued responses to frequently asked questions concerning Rule 15a-6 in relation to Regulation AC. See http://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mregacfaq0803.htm#partb. (Regulation AC is discussed in Part V.B, below.)

-----end-quote-----

The two interesting passages to me are one, "Issuers whose activities go beyond selling their own securities, however, need to consider whether they would need to register as broker-dealers. This includes issuers that purchase their securities from investors, as well as issuers that effectively operate markets in their own securities or in securities whose features or terms can change or be altered."

and two, "In addition, foreign broker-dealers that, from outside of the United States, induce or attempt to induce securities transactions by any person in the United States, or that use the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce of the United States for this purpose, also must register. This includes the use of the internet to offer securities, solicit securities transactions, or advertise investment services to U.S. persons."

To me this seems to mean that operating the GLBSE or listing assets would only be illegal if you were physically located in the USA. Of course, the US has laws which prohibit it's citizens from committing crimes while they are abroad; but if you're not a US citizen and not physically present in the USA, it seems that the only way to be guilty of a crime is to sell secutiries to people living in the USA.

Opinions/comments?
Pages:
Jump to: