Are the campaign managers doing the job correctly? - page 2.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: lucifer_8 on November 15, 2019, 03:27:17 AM

This particular user has been making below average posts in sections where signatures are not shown. So my question is why pay him, when he is not promoting the project, as supposed to be. Are the reputed campaign managers doing their job properly?

Coming from a member who is not even eligible to display the signatures yet... Cry

I don't really understand how the newbie accounts on the forum get to learn about the signature campaigns, good and the bad managers on the forum and form an opinion about them within such a short period of time. These multi-account scumbags I tell ya.

lucifer_8

jr. member

Activity: 53

Merit: 30

Quote from: yahoo62278 on November 15, 2019, 05:17:38 AM

If it's not against the rules, then it's not hurting the campaign. Unless that specific poster has posted a large % of his posts in that board(75% or greater) over the course of all his/her posts.

Posts still display the signature in all that users other posts from the start of his posting career.

Now with all that said, maybe us campaign managers need to make it a rule that posts where signatures aren't displayed do not count. Unless that rule is there though, it's not illegal for the user.

Just an fyi, if it is a cryptotalk participant I have no control over what cryptotalk pays for, but pm me and I'll look at the users post history and remove them if they're going overboard in certain sections.

No, I'm not talking about Crypto talk campaign. Maybe every campaign manager should implement that rule. Because, Out of the last100 posts, only 2 were posted in boards where signatures are displayed. I didn't see any violation of the campaign rules mentioned in the campaign. But I think this is a basic requirement to make your signatures visible when you are getting paid for it.
Anyhow I'll take LoyceMobiles suggestion and will inform the campaign manager about the participant through PM and see what he decides.
Thanks for all of your inputs.

AB de Royse777

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3878

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

Quote from: Findingnemo on November 15, 2019, 04:39:15 AM

~snip~
Serious discussion and its child board doesn't show any signature,and thread like WO has the same things but not sure about local boards.

There is WO too and reading at OP my guess is that he is meaning WO topic.
This is what I think, in a signature campaign all comes down to the manager and his employer. They are the end one who make a choice and if they are okay with this then I really do not see any issue as long as the forum is not flooding by spams.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 4554

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

If it's not against the rules, then it's not hurting the campaign. Unless that specific poster has posted a large % of his posts in that board(75% or greater) over the course of all his/her posts.

Posts still display the signature in all that users other posts from the start of his posting career.

Now with all that said, maybe us campaign managers need to make it a rule that posts where signatures aren't displayed do not count. Unless that rule is there though, it's not illegal for the user.

Just an fyi, if it is a cryptotalk participant I have no control over what cryptotalk pays for, but pm me and I'll look at the users post history and remove them if they're going overboard in certain sections.

Little Mouse

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 2100

Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse

I don't think any campaign manager will count post where signature is not displayed. I have managed one signature campaign till now and after accepting some of the users, I had PMed them notifying that on certain section or WO topic, post will not be counted although it common sense that no publicity is there for the campaign.
Have you contacted with the campaign manager? It may be a mistake from the campaign manager. No campaign will pay user who will bring nothing to the campaign, at least campaign manager who think of their reputation.
If possible, you can enclose the campaign manager name and questioned user.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: LoyceMobile on November 15, 2019, 03:45:57 AM

You're going to have to give examples, or report it to the campaign manager directly.

In general, there are good and bad campaign managers.

Im not sure if there is a section here in forum that doesn't show signatures of us, is there any? I think that's what OP saying or he means that there is a need to promote in our everypost our signature. Like telling in this post that look my signature then tell something.

Serious discussion and its child board doesn't show any signature,and thread like WO has the same things but not sure about local boards.

Basically signature campaigns paying their participants for carrying their signature under the post they were making,so yes they need to have required number of posts under the allowed sections to get payment,but you can make any number of posts on any section but it won't have to counted towards your reward posts.

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18711

Are you sure you are seeing all the user in question's posts? If you have any sections on ignore, then posts made in these sections will not be visible to you on the user's "Recent posts" page. I'm thinking in particular about the local boards, which many users have on ignore and some campaigns pay for.

If this isn't the case, then it's up to the manager to stop paying them and there is nothing anyone else can do. Contact the manager directly.

Bttzed03

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1150

https://bitcoincleanup.com/

This is the correct board imo.

Quote from: lucifer_8 on November 15, 2019, 03:27:17 AM

I see that one of the most reputed Signature Campaign Managers seems to be paying a particular participant for severals weeks, who has been making posts only in sections where signatures are not shown. I am not sharing the names because the campaign rules doesn't say anything about posts made in sections where signatures are banned.

Usually, posts on boards where signatures aren't displayed like WO aren't paid also but if it is not stated in the rules, then the manager probably missed that. It would be unfair for the company if a participant continues to get paid by posting on those boards.

Quote from: lucifer_8 on November 15, 2019, 03:27:17 AM

This particular user has been making below average posts in sections where signatures are not shown. So my question is why pay him, when he is not promoting the project, as supposed to be. Are the reputed campaign managers doing their job properly?

It's better to drop the name of the campaign and the participant to allow us have a better understanding of the matter. We cannot just assume that what you are saying is true.

LoyceMobile

hero member

Activity: 1659

Merit: 687

LoyceV on the road. Or couch.

You're going to have to give examples, or report it to the campaign manager directly.

In general, there are good and bad campaign managers.

lucifer_8

jr. member

Activity: 53

Merit: 30

I'm not sure this is the right place to post, if not please move it to the right board.

I'll keep this simple. Projects pay the signature campaign managers and participants to promote them in the forum, they will not pay you willing for not promoting them.
I see that one of the most reputed Signature Campaign Managers seems to be paying a particular participant for severals weeks, who has been making posts only in sections where signatures are not shown. I am not sharing the names because the campaign rules doesn't say anything about posts made in sections where signatures are banned.
This particular user has been making below average posts in sections where signatures are not shown. So my question is why pay him, when he is not promoting the project, as supposed to be. Are the reputed campaign managers doing their job properly?

Topic: Are the campaign managers doing the job correctly? - page 2. (Read 532 times)