Wait it's an insult to call someone who isn't gay gay and it's fine to call someone who's gay gay? Wtf!
Why would you assume someone's sexual orientation in the first place?
Topic: Are we still allowed to call people "gay"? (Read 1672 times)
Why would you assume someone's sexual orientation in the first place?
Wait it's an insult to call someone who isn't gay gay and it's fine to call someone who's gay gay? Wtf!
Yes you can (only if they are gay 
)
) I do not see the point in defining a person by their sexual orientation - would it feel good if people went around saying, "Oh god man, you're so straight"
In a similar fashion would you like it if people stopped and whispered in your ear nervously... "are you straight?"
Stupid really when we think about it. We were all born on this rock to co-exist, it would be daft to socially exclude other based of our own personal fears.
Gay, straight, bi, asexual, black, yellow, white, male, female etc, we're all the same
In a similar fashion would you like it if people stopped and whispered in your ear nervously... "are you straight?"
Stupid really when we think about it. We were all born on this rock to co-exist, it would be daft to socially exclude other based of our own personal fears.
Gay, straight, bi, asexual, black, yellow, white, male, female etc, we're all the same
Most awesome person on the forum.
Ty!
I do not see the point in defining a person by their sexual orientation - would it feel good if people went around saying, "Oh god man, you're so straight"
In a similar fashion would you like it if people stopped and whispered in your ear nervously... "are you straight?"
Stupid really when we think about it. We were all born on this rock to co-exist, it would be daft to socially exclude other based of our own personal fears.
Gay, straight, bi, asexual, black, yellow, white, male, female etc, we're all the same
In a similar fashion would you like it if people stopped and whispered in your ear nervously... "are you straight?"
Stupid really when we think about it. We were all born on this rock to co-exist, it would be daft to socially exclude other based of our own personal fears.
Gay, straight, bi, asexual, black, yellow, white, male, female etc, we're all the same
Most awesome person on the forum.
Jesus Christ himself was gay until that prostitute came along.
I think OP is referring to the new Synod of Bishops, the Catholic Church is trying to modernize itself and one of the "rulings" is about homosexual acceptance, they still don't see homosexual couples as equal to heterosexual couples, they simply say they are acceptable now...
this is puzzling imaho or hypocrite maybe.
i start by saying that obviously we do not exclude anyone on sexual basis.
however, on the base of church teachings, we have to discriminate homos because sodomy & C. is forbidden by the holy law
well, if religion is compelled to adequate his standards on the public opinion it become more and more meaningless.
unfortunately for them, they could no more be the compellers
maybe i'll be still alive when a gay pope will be accepted openly
(don't think so) 
I think OP is referring to the new Synod of Bishops, the Catholic Church is trying to modernize itself and one of the "rulings" is about homosexual acceptance, they still don't see homosexual couples as equal to heterosexual couples, they simply say they are acceptable now...
I believe this is a direct result of the survey they made last year, homosexual unions were on that questionnaire.
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20140626_instrumentum-laboris-familia_en.html
I believe this is a direct result of the survey they made last year, homosexual unions were on that questionnaire.
Quote
b) Concerning Unions of Persons of the Same Sex
Civil Recognition
110. On unions of persons of the same sex, the responses of the bishops' conferences refer to Church teaching. “There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God's plan for marriage and family. [...] Nonetheless, according to the teaching of the Church, men and women with homosexual tendencies ‘must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided’”
Civil Recognition
110. On unions of persons of the same sex, the responses of the bishops' conferences refer to Church teaching. “There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God's plan for marriage and family. [...] Nonetheless, according to the teaching of the Church, men and women with homosexual tendencies ‘must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided’”
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20140626_instrumentum-laboris-familia_en.html
I do not see the point in defining a person by their sexual orientation - would it feel good if people went around saying, "Oh god man, you're so straight"
In a similar fashion would you like it if people stopped and whispered in your ear nervously... "are you straight?"
Stupid really when we think about it. We were all born on this rock to co-exist, it would be daft to socially exclude other based of our own personal fears.
Gay, straight, bi, asexual, black, yellow, white, male, female etc, we're all the same
In a similar fashion would you like it if people stopped and whispered in your ear nervously... "are you straight?"
Stupid really when we think about it. We were all born on this rock to co-exist, it would be daft to socially exclude other based of our own personal fears.
Gay, straight, bi, asexual, black, yellow, white, male, female etc, we're all the same
Well I am pansexual
for the sake of curiosity, it means that someone like even non human creature?
you can't be serious?
well it was a provocatory but imaho legit question, since the etimology of the word means "sexual attracted to everything"
+1
Just look at the germans, they have dog's as partners ffs..
you can, and you must.
Don't be afraid
Don't be afraid
Ofcourse gay is gay so why not
The Catholic Church is the gayest organisation outside of GLAAD.
I thought gay people were already people?
EDIT: oh, I see now. A guy in a sequin robe has made a ruling about gayness.
EDIT: oh, I see now. A guy in a sequin robe has made a ruling about gayness.
On the internet, yes. In real life, no.
Is there somebody who are trying to alienate your right to use the word "gay"? If yes then use word "faggot" instead of "gay". I bet that any bans will be lifted very soon after applying such policy.
Well I am pansexual
for the sake of curiosity, it means that someone like even non human creature?
you can't be serious?
well it was a provocatory but imaho legit question, since the etimology of the word means "sexual attracted to everything"
Is it still politically incorrect to call threads like this "gay"?
Well I am pansexual
for the sake of curiosity, it means that someone like even non human creature?
you can't be serious?
Jump to: