Pages:
Author

Topic: Aren't we the reason why BTC is becoming too much centralized? - page 2. (Read 492 times)

sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 251
Most of these investors found out about Bitcoin from a claim that it would give them profit. They don't have enough knowledge about how the community works. It really possible that these big influential personalities could control their decisions.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 629
Its true that many investors are easily affected of negative news, influencers and FUD. They have a weak hands, probably lacking of informations on how things work on crypto.

Majority of panic sellers are new on crypto or plan to hold only for short term thus seeing the market in a situation they didnt expect lead them to sell at loss.

Thats why its a must to know what you're getting into to have your own understanding and decision. Negative news are quite normal, they just come and go but its up to us how to handle it.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
Bitcoin is more decentralized when compared to any other cryptocurrency and there is nothing to worry about the centralization right now. A lot of the critics point to the fact that major mining pools such as F2pool, Antpool and ViaBTC control a large share of the mining hash rate. But what they ignore is the fact that not a single individual mining farm accounts to more than 3% of the total hash rate. And the miners can leave or join the mining pools as per their preference. So the stats for major pools are not very significant.
sr. member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 339
I know I've used the "panic sell" so many times, but have you, for God's sake, ever imagined with a cool mind that whenever we panic sell during shakeouts in the markets, we are actually giving away our BTC to those big institutions who are willing to snatch it away from us, yeah I mean it, every single drop of BTC seems to be taken away from us and it'll be no longer an average guy's BTC which was Satoshi's vision (don't pull me on this, understand the emotions). So if it goes into the hands of these institutions and governments completely, where will we stand? Nowhere. Why don't we understand that it's all more of an intrigue well thought out to wipe out every single BTC hodler (even the smallest one out there) and take away the control from the hands of common people whom Satoshi Nakamoto left BTC with.
It’s everywhere and you can’t stop it. It is a normal thing that happens in every market, there are things that can happen and it will lead to the market either falling or going up, it’s just as it is and you can’t change it. Although I don’t think that’s a reason why the market would be either centralized or decentralized. And as for the big institutions, well that’s another thing, and I am aware that they have all been buying up  a lot of coins in the market. But, you also have to know that none of them would be ready to hold it forever.

There will still come a time when they will have to dump it ,and it will be retailers that will end up buying and it will still circulate. If they don’t, well, everyone is simply going to abandon it for them , there are already lots of other coins that people can invest in.
sr. member
Activity: 1297
Merit: 294
''Vincit qui se vincit''
Centralization will always exploit decentralization, where there is control, there is power for those selfish people that want to rule something or anything.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1012
~snip~
However, since most of us want instant return, and it's possible in crypto, newbies are just too attracted to that reality, making them invest in a bull market, or at a peak instead of waiting for the price to dip before they'll invest.
^ This is true because most of the newcomers in BTC investment are looking for this, they want an instant profit and all they had to want is to earn in a short period of time. Just like invested now and gain profit in the next day, that is not how BTC investment work, you should need to wait for a perfect time for that. However, regarding the punic sell, most again are those newcomers, they are very prone to this because we know that all of their concerns are profit in a short term.
On the one hand, it is easy, on the other hand, it is difficult to accuse newcomers that they want a quick and easy profit, because every investor would like a quick and easy profit. Another question is that the accumulated experience teaches that such a thing is rarely available and it is experience that allows you to avoid large losses from unsuccessful investments. But do not blame everything only for beginners, because panic sales are inherent in all markets with high risk, and the cryptocurrency market is included in this category, and if at first everything starts with profit-taking, then all this can end with sales in an effort to save at least part of the investment.
hero member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 504
Well, you have a point @OP that, being influenced by institutions and whales to a great extent could form or make the system go into centralization with every individual,  the common man actually loosing his or her precious sats to institutions that could be monitored by the government. This already could be a failed scheme should we have the slightest government involvement as some sort of a strategy to actually get bitcoin away from the public. One thing I know fir sure about the government across tenors is that, they are never united. Each leader would want to be known for something unique and as such, wouldn't continue the plans and projects of the other instead, they abandon them and head for another.

Getting thy precious sats from the commo  man would be a very long and taking job to do and government can pass on this task from persons to persons, making it a failed endeavour already.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
I think it was a property of the wealth in the past, and was, kinda, in recent times but with USD and other currencies beginning to crash, expect more and more of the middle class/averaging working man to start picking up on BTC, either as a long term investment or something they expect to use often. The poor can't afford the price swings like the rich can, but the middle class is usually a bit more resistant.

A middle class would never go for hodling option TBH because they look for quick gains rather than long holds as they have a family they need to look after while also maintaining that "upper middle class" image in the society. Such people can't afford to buy 1 full BTC ATM because of its price of course, but they won't even buy a fraction of it after watching too many negativity spread in the markets as well as quick selloffs if they're new to this. They will fear of losing some % of their capital and then would need to redeem their fiat in loss.

I think you're right to an extent, but perhaps in the future things will change. Like I said, I'm putting this in the perspective of USD going into the dirt, so people with money will look to put their net worth into something other than liquid cash. Middle class are a bit slower to diversify into other investments, but if they're forced to, I think they'll choose BTC over precious metals/stocks.

Thing that scares them is the volatility, but at some point USD becomes more unpredictable than crypto if you don't stop endless printing.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 644
~snip~
However, since most of us want instant return, and it's possible in crypto, newbies are just too attracted to that reality, making them invest in a bull market, or at a peak instead of waiting for the price to dip before they'll invest.
^ This is true because most of the newcomers in BTC investment are looking for this, they want an instant profit and all they had to want is to earn in a short period of time. Just like invested now and gain profit in the next day, that is not how BTC investment work, you should need to wait for a perfect time for that. However, regarding the punic sell, most again are those newcomers, they are very prone to this because we know that all of their concerns are profit in a short term.
hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 904
Probably you are correct because we easily panic, that's the reason why the market can easily be manipulated by the whales. As of now, there's still not big improvement, crypto market is still a speculative market, we move on hype and FUD and that makes the price so volatile which makes it risky to invest.

However, since most of us want instant return, and it's possible in crypto, newbies are just too attracted to that reality, making them invest in a bull market, or at a peak instead of waiting for the price to dip before they'll invest.

As a result, whenever the price move opposite to their expectation, they panic as their focus on short-term profit.
full member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 180
I think it was a property of the wealth in the past, and was, kinda, in recent times but with USD and other currencies beginning to crash, expect more and more of the middle class/averaging working man to start picking up on BTC, either as a long term investment or something they expect to use often. The poor can't afford the price swings like the rich can, but the middle class is usually a bit more resistant.

A middle class would never go for hodling option TBH because they look for quick gains rather than long holds as they have a family they need to look after while also maintaining that "upper middle class" image in the society. Such people can't afford to buy 1 full BTC ATM because of its price of course, but they won't even buy a fraction of it after watching too many negativity spread in the markets as well as quick selloffs if they're new to this. They will fear of losing some % of their capital and then would need to redeem their fiat in loss.
I'm on a middle class and I understand the value of holding which I did since the last bull run, holding is not easy but if you are dedicated enough and know your goals for long term, that holdings can be easy for you. Don't blame yourself for the market being more centralized, you are just a small time player who always follow the trend and the whales, that's normal and we can't prevent this one. Government intervention are also growing, so we can expect a more centralized market especially when regulations take place.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1273
I think it was a property of the wealth in the past, and was, kinda, in recent times but with USD and other currencies beginning to crash, expect more and more of the middle class/averaging working man to start picking up on BTC, either as a long term investment or something they expect to use often. The poor can't afford the price swings like the rich can, but the middle class is usually a bit more resistant.

A middle class would never go for hodling option TBH because they look for quick gains rather than long holds as they have a family they need to look after while also maintaining that "upper middle class" image in the society. Such people can't afford to buy 1 full BTC ATM because of its price of course, but they won't even buy a fraction of it after watching too many negativity spread in the markets as well as quick selloffs if they're new to this. They will fear of losing some % of their capital and then would need to redeem their fiat in loss.
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 403
Panic selling has been around in this industry ever since I can remember. And this does not apply only on new comers as what many people may say. Obviously most does this but there are some that actually know what they are doing or some that are invested on good insider groups. To clarify, even veterans sometimes sell out of panic depending on the situation and the type of fud being spread out. These cycle of events happen always and will do so for many years to come since it mostly is a great contributor in making this industry thrive. Better enjoy the volatility instead of hating on it which would do no one any good.

Now about the centralization, I do not think that big institutions alone can make bitcoin widely centralized since these big institutions themselves like to keep some things secret specially things that bring lots of benefits. Although centralization seems like a nightmare to any bitcoin enthusiast, sooner or later something just has got to give. And that obviously will be bitcoin since centralization is such a vital thing if we are to really make bitcoin get adopted fully world wide. But of course that won't mean it will be fully centralized since I do not think most crypto enthusiasts will agree to it. Specially now that more and more big names are intertwined with bitcoin. Anyway, only time will tell. We may not even be able to live long enough to see this happening for real. But just in case, there's still coins like monero, sovryn and more. So don't go stressing your self too much about this.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
I fully understand you in your thinking, and I agree that more and more BTC increasingly becoming the property of wealthy individuals, and thus centralizing and in some way becoming inaccessible to ordinary people. From the publicly released data of all companies and funds that have invested in Bitcoin so far, they currently hold just over 8% of the max supply - but I believe that is much more considering there are a lot of investments that are not public.

Yet the market is completely open, anyone can buy and sell BTC whenever and however much they want - and I have said so many times that ordinary people have 10+ years to invest in BTC, who to blame for not doing that? Satoshi has given everyone an equal opportunity, those who are poor and have only a few $ in their pocket, to those who have billions - now only those who are a little richer can afford 1 BTC - but that is the price of progress and adaptation.


I think it was a property of the wealth in the past, and was, kinda, in recent times but with USD and other currencies beginning to crash, expect more and more of the middle class/averaging working man to start picking up on BTC, either as a long term investment or something they expect to use often. The poor can't afford the price swings like the rich can, but the middle class is usually a bit more resistant.
hero member
Activity: 2478
Merit: 695
SecureShift.io | Crypto-Exchange
So whenever Elon Musk tweets, we panic sell.
Whenever China says something like they'll stop mining and add some extra official shit to it, we panic sell.
When USA says their investors will need to disclose their crypto holdings over a certain amount, we panic sell.

On every panicking news, we panic sell.
They create enough FUD, and we panic sell.

I know I've used the "panic sell" so many times, but have you, for God's sake, ever imagined with a cool mind that whenever we panic sell during shakeouts in the markets, we are actually giving away our BTC to those big institutions who are willing to snatch it away from us, yeah I mean it, every single drop of BTC seems to be taken away from us and it'll be no longer an average guy's BTC which was Satoshi's vision (don't pull me on this, understand the emotions). So if it goes into the hands of these institutions and governments completely, where will we stand? Nowhere. Why don't we understand that it's all more of an intrigue well thought out to wipe out every single BTC hodler (even the smallest one out there) and take away the control from the hands of common people whom Satoshi Nakamoto left BTC with.

Exactly bro, i think the crypto community should be able to recognize this and stop being used by this big whales, people should learn to ignore whatever fud this guys will come up with and continue as nothing happened, especially something as little as a mare tweet from a none crypto OG can get people scared to the point of selling off their coin they bought with their hard earned money, by doing this, the crypto community appears vulnerable and also show that they can be easily manipulated into selling their assets. About time people change such behavior.
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 286
I think bitcoin is not being centralized as people gets influenced by FUD or commit panic selling, as you convert bitcoin into fiat, by then it will be consider as centralized as it gets converted into a centralized currency. Nevertheless, we should never tolerate falling into baits or FUDs no matter how big the influence of a certain individual is. You should make sure that your decisions are not based on assumptions or speculations alone, go ahead and work on it yourself so that you can have a firm decision when it comes to your investment.
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 293
You're so damn right! People go on and on about how Musk or other public figures manipulate the price of Bitcoin, but it would've never happened if people weren't so damn stupid and didn't swallow the bait. The human factor, emotions - this is the thing that makes, let's call it pseudo-centralization. Yes, there's no third party involved in price regulation, but people think the same, act similarly, that's why we are in this kind of situation today.
Hopefully, soon people will become more familiar with cryptocurrencies and won't make the same old mistakes.
Not to mention that besides the manipulation, they even celebrate this influencers getting in the market not knowing that they have an ulterior motive. Plus, decentralization won't last because companies won't stop getting into the market because there is an opportunity.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
Ok, I accept that we paid the price to get towards progress and adaptation. But then, why are they increasing the price of BTC? They should either dump it completely and keep it lower because then, these institutions will have a very fair as well as ranged BTC in order or buy from very low prices in futures and make much better returns.

No matter what institutions and wealthy individuals buy through OTC, it is not possible to hide the outflow from crypto exchanges and the law of supply and demand increases the price. Besides, $35 000 is probably a lot of money for you and me, but for a fund with billions of dollars, it's actually a trifle - the current price for such players is not a problem - but things will change when the OTC market can no longer keep up with demand, and then we can expect the price to rise sharply.

Nothing in life is perfect, Bitcoin and everything around it should not be considered something that has no flaws - and people have always had some crazy need to twist everything they touch - it comes down to the fact that Bitcoin is not what Satoshi imagined, but it will be what those who use it in one way or another will make of it.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
I agree with everything OP says. He is 100% right, but at the same time it is the reason why it is decentralized as well. If we all panic sell when Elon tweets that doesn't mean we are centralized, I understand that you think we are giving Elon a right to drop or increase the prices, but it is once again we the people who decide if we want to sell or not, Elon can't drop the price all by himself, that would be centralized, it is the people who make a decision and decided that they care about what he tweets, so it is still decentralized even while he has the power to up or down the prices with a tweet because We give him that power.

So instead of federal bank causing dollar to be worthless, it is Elon that decides on bitcoin and I know that sounds similar and make you think it is centralized but who does he get that power from? Us. Which is why it is still better than fiat.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 421
Bitcoindata.science
  A whole lot of people see Bitcoin as Ponzi scheme and treat it as one so once the price drops the panic and sell of their coins. Overcoming FUD especially for newer investors is quite challenging and so selling comes first to their minds once any negative tweet or ban treat pops up against Bitcoin. I was once a victim of this it really took me a whole lot of decipline to put my emotions in order realizing Bitcoin is an investment.
Pages:
Jump to: