Oh and i have made some dozens of full custom chips at 28nm specifically tailored to mine bitcoin and litecoins. 1 terahash per chip. True story.
Ships in 4-6 weeks?
Topic: artforz and coblee gpu mining litecoin since the start? - page 18. (Read 32574 times)
Ships in 4-6 weeks?
I've learned to ignore the solidcoin shills.
They are actually bots programmed to rile you.
They are actually bots programmed to rile you.
Another pathetic tentative to attack litecoin? 
Ridicolous.
Oh and i have made some dozens of full custom chips at 28nm specifically tailored to mine bitcoin and litecoins. 1 terahash per chip. True story.
Ridicolous. Oh and i have made some dozens of full custom chips at 28nm specifically tailored to mine bitcoin and litecoins. 1 terahash per chip. True story.
Typical coinhunter, continuing to be worthless to the crypto currency community.
Are you really that sad, your coin comes to a crashing halt; and your response instead of improving your system, is bashing another.
You would do quite well in Washington, DC (slumming it with the underlords of douche baggery)
Are you really that sad, your coin comes to a crashing halt; and your response instead of improving your system, is bashing another.
You would do quite well in Washington, DC (slumming it with the underlords of douche baggery)
I also don't really care about the price because I'm not in this for the money, but on last check the price of each SC is nearly 4x that of LiteCoin.
Seriously CoinHunter. If you didn't care about price, then why do you keep manipulating block rewards to try to reach dollar parity? SC block rewards is now only ~0.05 (1/1000 of Litecoin). And SC price is only about 3x that of LTC. That's rather weak in my opinion. Maybe that's why you come here to spread your FUD?
I also don't really care about the price because I'm not in this for the money, but on last check the price of each SC is nearly 4x that of LiteCoin.
Seriously CoinHunter. If you didn't care about price, then why do you keep manipulating block rewards to try to reach dollar parity? SC block rewards is now only ~0.05 (1/1000 of Litecoin). And SC price is only about 3x that of LTC. That's rather weak in my opinion. Maybe that's why you come here to spread your FUD?
Well.. since everyone knows now that cobblee and artforz have a top secret gpu miner.. and i am part of the dozen people who are allowed to use it.. let me share it with all of you:
Code:
The miner is written in plain C# and doesnt need any special libraries besides what you have anyway. I havent tested it, but since it is written in MONO on windows it might be cross platform compatible... For more hash you have to tweak lines 31 and 32.. but dont expect too much, its just a preview of what cobblefart is.. By the way.. fun is: You can set it to any pool you like.. its speed sucks on bitcoin but is a bomb on Solidcoin and Scrypt - and its wattage is awesome. Not much more than simple idle power consumption at 200kh
Code: http://pastebin.com/aCR53QcY
Code:
The miner is written in plain C# and doesnt need any special libraries besides what you have anyway. I havent tested it, but since it is written in MONO on windows it might be cross platform compatible... For more hash you have to tweak lines 31 and 32.. but dont expect too much, its just a preview of what cobblefart is.. By the way.. fun is: You can set it to any pool you like.. its speed sucks on bitcoin but is a bomb on Solidcoin and Scrypt - and its wattage is awesome. Not much more than simple idle power consumption at 200kh
Code: http://pastebin.com/aCR53QcY
We have found a bug in the code to make it look like we are mining at 1 MH/S on a simple dual core.. however only 1 share was submitted.. again.. no real proof
Dubious at best.
source or gtfo
source or gtfo
Well.. since everyone knows now that cobblee and artforz have a top secret gpu miner.. and i am part of the dozen people who are allowed to use it.. let me share it with all of you:
Code:
The miner is written in plain C# and doesnt need any special libraries besides what you have anyway. I havent tested it, but since it is written in MONO on windows it might be cross platform compatible... For more hash you have to tweak lines 31 and 32.. but dont expect too much, its just a preview of what cobblefart is.. By the way.. fun is: You can set it to any pool you like.. its speed sucks on bitcoin but is a bomb on Solidcoin and Scrypt - and its wattage is awesome. Not much more than simple idle power consumption at 200kh
Code: http://pastebin.com/aCR53QcY
Code:
The miner is written in plain C# and doesnt need any special libraries besides what you have anyway. I havent tested it, but since it is written in MONO on windows it might be cross platform compatible... For more hash you have to tweak lines 31 and 32.. but dont expect too much, its just a preview of what cobblefart is.. By the way.. fun is: You can set it to any pool you like.. its speed sucks on bitcoin but is a bomb on Solidcoin and Scrypt - and its wattage is awesome. Not much more than simple idle power consumption at 200kh
Code: http://pastebin.com/aCR53QcY
I heard that all SolidCoin blocks fund transfers to CoinHunter's personal wallet. When he gets tired of playing with SolidCoin, he's planning on cashing them out and killing the chain.
I am no GPGPU expert, but I think ArtForz made some very good points in the following thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tenebrix-scaling-questions-45849
CoinHunter could make his claims convincing by simply explaining how to address the GPU limitations outlined by ArtForz.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tenebrix-scaling-questions-45849
CoinHunter could make his claims convincing by simply explaining how to address the GPU limitations outlined by ArtForz.
Recently one of our developers mtrlt spent about 4 hours adding scrypt support to Reaper, the SolidCoin GPU miner.
http://solidcointalk.org/topic/545-litecoin-scrypt-gpu-miner/
It currently gets ~250KH/s on a 6990 . This is after only 4 hours of optimization. Is it possible the "botnet" or "darkpool" mining Litecoin is actually artforz and coblee who have been mining LiteCoin using an unfair advantage since the start? Conning litecoin users into thinking it's a CPU mining chain when in fact the GPU dominates it?
Artforz is on the record as saying his GPU miner of scrypt only got 9KH/s on a 6870 GPU. Something suspicious here when our developer can get massive improvements over CPU with only 4 hours of effort. Either artforz is terrible at creating GPU miners or he lied to litecoin users.
http://solidcointalk.org/topic/545-litecoin-scrypt-gpu-miner/
It currently gets ~250KH/s on a 6990 . This is after only 4 hours of optimization. Is it possible the "botnet" or "darkpool" mining Litecoin is actually artforz and coblee who have been mining LiteCoin using an unfair advantage since the start? Conning litecoin users into thinking it's a CPU mining chain when in fact the GPU dominates it?
Artforz is on the record as saying his GPU miner of scrypt only got 9KH/s on a 6870 GPU. Something suspicious here when our developer can get massive improvements over CPU with only 4 hours of effort. Either artforz is terrible at creating GPU miners or he lied to litecoin users.
Or maybe the dark pool is you and mtrlt mining LTC for an unfair advantage the whole time and only now saying you have a miner.
CoinHunter, if you were just doing a public service to announce this, shouldn't the title for this post be "GPU mining on litecoin possible!" instead of accusing me of something that you have absolutely no proof of because I'm not doing it. If an efficient GPU miner for scrypt is possible, this is the first time I'm hearing it. I'm no expert in scrypt, but a few knowledgeable people I know have looked at it and determined that it is designed to not work well on GPUs. Is it possibl that they are wrong? sure, but until I see solid proof, this is just another FUD post from CoinHunter.
I will say this.. when he passes the FUD.. I was able to pickup some LTC cheap and make some extra BTC..
CoinHunter, if you were just doing a public service to announce this, shouldn't the title for this post be "GPU mining on litecoin possible!" instead of accusing me of something that you have absolutely no proof of because I'm not doing it. If an efficient GPU miner for scrypt is possible, this is the first time I'm hearing it. I'm no expert in scrypt, but a few knowledgeable people I know have looked at it and determined that it is designed to not work well on GPUs. Is it possibl that they are wrong? sure, but until I see solid proof, this is just another FUD post from CoinHunter.
It currently gets ~250KH/s on a 6990 .
OMG.. i beat your numbers with a simple 24 core hyperthreaded VM
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] thread 8: 11434 hashes, 16.44 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] thread 16: 17381 hashes, 14.62 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] accepted: 161072/161923 (99.47%), 340.01 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] accepted: 161073/161924 (99.47%), 340.01 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] thread 17: 11655 hashes, 17.04 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] accepted: 161074/161925 (99.47%), 340.97 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] thread 12: 58743 hashes, 15.53 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] thread 4: 35851 hashes, 15.28 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] accepted: 161075/161926 (99.47%), 341.01 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] accepted: 161076/161927 (99.47%), 341.01 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:29:10] thread 15: 146456 hashes, 15.71 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:29:11] accepted: 161077/161928 (99.47%), 343.31 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:29:11] thread 8: 15402 hashes, 14.10 khash/s
BTW.. real number 72 Khash/s... so yeah.. nice try
hey guys i think i finally figured out what FUD meant!
Omg.. look at my fast speeds!!!!!
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159703/160544 (99.48%), 359.00 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159704/160545 (99.48%), 359.00 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 12: 41812 hashes, 16.84 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 14: 51635 hashes, 16.12 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159705/160546 (99.48%), 361.42 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 8: 52946 hashes, 15.96 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159706/160547 (99.48%), 362.82 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 11: 57687 hashes, 16.35 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159707/160548 (99.48%), 361.77 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 16: 57704 hashes, 16.03 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159708/160549 (99.48%), 362.95 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:36] thread 3: 61429 hashes, 16.41 khash/s
Yeah.. its bullshit.. some virtual machines show incorrect speeds
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159703/160544 (99.48%), 359.00 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159704/160545 (99.48%), 359.00 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 12: 41812 hashes, 16.84 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 14: 51635 hashes, 16.12 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159705/160546 (99.48%), 361.42 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 8: 52946 hashes, 15.96 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159706/160547 (99.48%), 362.82 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 11: 57687 hashes, 16.35 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159707/160548 (99.48%), 361.77 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] thread 16: 57704 hashes, 16.03 khash/s
[2011-12-24 08:24:35] accepted: 159708/160549 (99.48%), 362.95 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2011-12-24 08:24:36] thread 3: 61429 hashes, 16.41 khash/s
Yeah.. its bullshit.. some virtual machines show incorrect speeds
We could have mined secretly with GPU for much time and got many litecoins doing it. So please put it in perspective about why we are releasing this info to the public.
Because attacking public opinion about your competitors is worth more to you than pure anonymous profit? It's not hard to imagine the perspective of an anonymous con man running a Ponzi scheme.
Just let me ask you this. Where is _any_ proof that art or cobblee are(were doing that? Remember the "penis" botnet? More likely its your corrupted being that now tries to "scare" people away from "dishonest" projects.. There has been so far but one Chain creator out here that used a botnet to stabilize his chain and later to ddos other networks and pools...
Sorry RS.. that was again one of your less bright ideas to come up with.
Please dear Mods, remove this thread altogether or send it to offtopic.. nothing but accusations and claims with no real worth..
Sounds like Nachtwind is involved aswell ! Sorry RS.. that was again one of your less bright ideas to come up with.
Please dear Mods, remove this thread altogether or send it to offtopic.. nothing but accusations and claims with no real worth..
Sure i am.. I was the "penis" botnet. Mined SC with a pool of.. uhh 400 PCs or so..
No wait.. i had a secret Artforz GPU miner for SC and was able to come up with >50% of the whole SC network with just my single 6850...
One question i just get into my mind.. if Art had such an increadibly wonderful miner.. why not making it publicly available? From what i read so far anything that could harm SC would be something he would release.. and such a wonderweapon would be something for it..
Just let me ask you this. Where is _any_ proof that art or cobblee are(were doing that? Remember the "penis" botnet? More likely its your corrupted being that now tries to "scare" people away from "dishonest" projects.. There has been so far but one Chain creator out here that used a botnet to stabilize his chain and later to ddos other networks and pools...
Sorry RS.. that was again one of your less bright ideas to come up with.
Please dear Mods, remove this thread altogether or send it to offtopic.. nothing but accusations and claims with no real worth..
Sounds like Nachtwind is involved aswell ! Sorry RS.. that was again one of your less bright ideas to come up with.
Please dear Mods, remove this thread altogether or send it to offtopic.. nothing but accusations and claims with no real worth..
Jump to: