Topic: Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV (Read 104 times)

All? ? ? One Comirnaty, all others (Pfizer, Moderna, jj,... ) lost aswith all legal status.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57832033

Secondary it is known for 15 years a cure and prevention for coronavirus exist, no no  Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) is even possible.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-cure-for-covid-19-is-right-here-5252003

Why would you think the vaccines are experimental? All approved vaccines have been through the standard three phase clinical trials, and are fully documented.


I don't know quite what it is you're doing with the vaccine if it involves mutilation and experiments. I would advise instead to take the vaccine in the normal way. It's safer, and is unlikely to result in a visit from the police.

Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV
"mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited".

Enough scientific material is available to deal with Covid without mutilation and experiments with the so called vaccines.
Those responsible and partaking will be bought to justice.

Nope. As the previous poster said, read that seatbelt analogy. That basically covers it.


In a quite straightforward and logical manner. You could actually look at the data. As I said recently in another thread...

Hey there, would you mind reading my analogy to seat belts? I'm sorry that you didn't know, but no medicine, including vaccines, works 100%. Similar to seat belts. Would you say seat belts are a scam since people still die while using those, even though they're supposed to offer complete protection (they're not, nobody says that you're immortal when driving around with a seat belt)?

A vaccine is supposed to offer complete protection against the virus. Hence, vaccinated people are not supposed to catch and spread the virus. Instead, they do catch, spread and still die from the virus they are supposed to have been protected from. The wear mask and still follow all the preventive rules outline by the so called experts. How does this add up?

LOL sorry, but you're quite ignorant if you don't understand that there's a spectrum between

A works 100% and
A works 0%

Just because something doesn't reduce risks to 0 doesn't mean it doesn't work.

Do you drive without seat belt? Because people die every day with a seat belt on.
Would you go onto a forum and post this?

THE BIG SEAT BELT CONSPIRACY
Does NOT Protect drivers from crashes
because drivers with seat belt on crash into stuff from time to time
Does NOT Protect drivers from death
because drivers with seat belt on die in accidents
Does NOT Protect drivers from injuries
because drivers with seat belt on have injuries in accidents

---

Regarding the whole gene therapy claims:

It was already mentioned that BionTech and Moderna are pure mRNA vaccines, meaning they instruct your body to produce viral protein for as long as they exist (a couple hours until destroyed). Then the immune system reacts to the viral proteins, forms antibodies and stores the information in memory B cells for a long time (even after antibodies are gone after a few months). No modifications to your genome of any kind.

However, AstraZeneca is a DNA based vaccine, so for one it can stay in the body for longer and it is also taken into cells' DNA locally to the vaccination. However, this is not a modification of your actual genome, like you claim.

---

TL;DR: maybe refresh your genetics and molecular biology knowledge. Wikipedia is quite good and there are some great books on it as well!

Utterly ridiculous. Let's pluck one example from the cesspool:

Okay. Some double-vaccinated people have died, yes, agreed. Let's pick some numbers to illustrate your point. We'll start with a population of 100 people..
Scenario A) 0 people get vaccinated. 100 people catch the virus. 30 die.
Scenario B) 100 people get vaccinated. 30 people catch the virus. 2 die.

You are arguing that because something is non-zero, that means it can't have reduced. I don't know how to argue against such poor logic.




And it doesn't matter how many times you call it "gene-therapy". You can want something as much as you like; it doesn't make it true.

“mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.

The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine, and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:

The Pfizer and Moderna Vaccines do NOT Provide immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene-therapy that does not provide immunity to COVID. The vaccine is claimed to reduce symptoms. Yet skeptics claim that double-vaccinated people represent 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU care.

Does NOT Protect recipients from getting the virus
Opponents argue, this gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated people can still catch and spread the virus.

Does NOT Reduce deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with COVID have also died.

Does NOT Reduce circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

Does NOT Reduce transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.



The COVID Nuremberg trail is needed because the “experimental” vaccines violate all 10 of the Nuremburg Codes according to the litigators.

Nuremburg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential
No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent.

Nuremburg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means
The gene-therapy does not meet the criteria of a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus.

Nuremburg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease
This gene-therapy skipped animal testing and went straight to human trials

Nuremburg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury
Since the rollout of the U.S. experiment, the CDC VAERS reporting system cited lots of deaths and vaccine injuries. Same in EU and rest of world.
This is a grievous violation of this code.

Nuremburg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur
Based on the aforementioned deaths and side effects, this “gene-therapy” is injurious and must be banned.

Nuremburg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit
COVID-19 has a 98-99% recovery rate. The vaccine deaths and adverse side-effects recklessly compete against this high natural recovery rate

Nuremburg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death
There were no preparations made by Pfizer, Moderna or its backers.

Nuremburg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons
Politicians, media, and Hollywood actors claimed that these vaccines were “safe and effective,” but they were not qualified to judge.

Nuremburg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time
Despite the outcry from more than 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists, and epidemiologist, the experiment is not ending

Nuremburg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death
It is clear in the statistical reporting data that this experiment is resulting in deaths and injuries. Yet all the politicians, drug companies, and so-called “experts,” are not making an

https://medicalveritas.org/covid-nuremberg-trial/