Topic: The cure for Covid-19 is right here. (Read 3111 times)

They did not have to.  Your Amish hat and the Bible in your hand told them everything they needed to know.

I went to Tractor Supply today, and they didn't even ask me about the ivermectin and fenbendazole I was buying. When I questioned the check-out clerk about this - considering all the medical noise out there - she said, "I'm not supposed to say this, but many (if not most) animal owners take a little of these medicines for themselves, right out of the tubes, before they feed it to their horses and dogs. And they've been doing this for years."

Down with the criminals, no need for them.


Lucky this is Bitcointalk and no government shills around...

The cure for Covid-19 is right here.


Shut government down.

Chlorine dioxide is toxic for humans too!! While it may kill the virus, it could also potentially kill the person that is infected with the virus.

Tractor Supply (and others) should raise their prices for Ivermectin, because it will keep some people from staying healthy, 'cause they can't get Ivermectin cheap any longer.

Did you ever see a horse get Covid? Good horse lovers treat their horses with Ivermectin all the time.

India’s Uttar Pradesh State Now COVID-Free, Recovery Rate Up 98.6% Because Of Ivermectin
https://www.christianitydaily.com/articles/13293/20210917/india-s-uttar-pradesh-state-now-covid-free-recovery-rate-up-98-6-because-of-ivermectin.htm

It's not so cheap this days
https://stromectolhome.com/

New research has found that getting sufficient levels of ambient ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation at an individual’s place of residence in the weeks before a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infection has a strong protective effect against a severe case of the virus and even death. This study solidifies the role of vitamin D in protecting people against COVID-19.

The study was conducted by researchers from Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and the University of Edinburgh (UoE) in Scotland. It has been published in the journal Scientific Reports.

Previous studies have found a strong link between vitamin D deficiency and increased susceptibility to viral and bacterial respiratory infection. Other studies have also found a strong correlation between COVID-19 and vitamin D deficiency.

But many of these studies have been ignored or belittled, with scientists attempting to argue that the increased susceptibility could be due to other factors such as older age, obesity or chronic illness. (Related: Since COVID-19 vaccines are said to be free for the “health of the nation,” why aren’t they giving away vitamin D and other vital supplements?)

To make sure detractors can’t mistake the effects of vitamin D for other demographic, health and lifestyle factors, the researchers found a way to calculate vitamin D levels of the study’s participants based on their genetics.

This method is known as Mendelian randomization. According to The BMJ, it “uses genetic variation to investigate the relations between modifiable risk factors and health outcomes in observational data.”

This approach gave the researchers a way to properly investigate any causal link between vitamin D and COVID-19.

The study involved nearly half a million individuals in the United Kingdom. The researchers looked at the vitamin D levels of the participants as predicted by their genetics and by UVB.

UVB rays are very important to vitamin D production in the skin. UVB rays from the sun hit cholesterol in skin cells, which provides the energy for vitamin D synthesis to occur.
Study showed vitamin D protects against severe and deadly COVID-19 infection

The Mendelian randomization analysis was inconclusive, and the researchers believe the number of COVID-19 cases in the study is too small to convincingly determine a causal effect between genetically predicted vitamin D levels and COVID-19.

But the researchers did find that ambient UVB radiation at the place of residence of a person before a COVID-19 infection helped determine a person’s chances of getting hospitalized or even dying from the coronavirus.

...

...

Pfizermectin!  It's not even totally a joke.  Pfizer does seem to have 'invented' a drug which is the functional equivalent of Ivermectin (but which they can sell for a lot more money.)

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9Gva3EKB_o

From reading (what little was released) from the early trials, I had a suspicion that the pharmaceutical companies pushing these gene therapies had the goal mostly of getting some cheap testing of their 'platforms' and didn't even have time to make them do a damn thing for 'covid'.  Now that they have been in use, the chickens have come home to roost.  The demonstrably don't do shit, and are even worse than nothing as evidenced by the number of people filling up the hospitals and morgues now.  Not to mention the snowballing of the 'variants'.

I've heard insiders saying that Ivermectin is widely given to vaccinated people (only), but kind of quietly.  This would be expected, as would coming out with their own pill that they could sell for more money.

Most people in the United States have not heard of ivermectin even though it's been around for more than 30 years and is one of the most distributed drugs on Earth, with more than 2.5 billion doses given out globally over the last 30 years.

Many Americans first started to learn about ivermectin in December 2020 when Dr. Pierre Kory testified in front of the Homeland Security Committee and gave an impassioned testimony about the medicine as a treatment for COVID-19, but the backlash against his position soon arrived.

On March 5, the FDA published a statement online entitled Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19. You may think that the statement would discuss the FDA's research on the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin, a cheap generic drug whose patent expired in 1996, but instead their statement was a masterful sleight of hand, as it does not say what most people think it says.

----------

David Thunder
@davidjthunder
Why Is the FDA Attacking a Safe, Effective Drug? - WSJ

“The Food and Drug Administration claims to follow the science. So why is it attacking ivermectin, a medication it certified in 1996?”

----------

THE THREE MYTHS OF IVERMECTIN

Myth #1) Ivermectin is not an anti-viral, it’s just a horse de-wormer.

Myth #2) Many people are getting sick from using ivermectin when they are trying to use it for COVID-19.

Myth #3) The FDA has researched the effectiveness of ivermectin against COVID-19

...