Topic: As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi! - page 14. (Read 13014 times)

I don't care who the Sathoshi actually is. I only care about his amazing work. We should really thankful to him about the work. If he needs to be anonymous, let him be. It is his right.

How are your attempts at destroying BTC using LN going?    

LOL, you do know that BTC is Centralized to the Chinese Mining Pools, they are the ones blocking segwit.  
So the battle to be Decentralized has been lost for over a year.


 

FYI:
By the Way , Franky1 is Correct and Gmaxwell is incorrect.
4 is more than 2.  

franky1 is now also an enemy of fungiblity and not just decentralization? color me surprised.

FWIW, rumor I'm hearing is that Wright is going to be the marketing face for some a new altcoin.   If anyone is selling futures on it, I'm interested in shorting it.

Due to several issues coindesk lost its hard gained reputation. Now it could have made plans to regain the same traffic to the website through such statements. This might grab the attention of most users as it is a sensitive information.

not whining. he did hit the point. he just didnt realise he was slapping his own face.
2 vs 4
gmaxwll is 4 lover and a 2 hater

May be craig have paid some bucks to coindesk for this rumor. No any source is mentioned on the article, so i will consider this as another attempt to create fud and panic in the market. Nobody gonna believe him as satoshi

He cannot because he don't have access to those earliest key. 

I doubt it was group, how could group maintain long term conspiracy and refrain from spending  bitcoins

Stop that whining. Gmaxwell hit the point

And im not believing this shit anymore. Wheres the evidence that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi Nakamoto? Anyone can claim he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto will not reveal himself. I've read many of this kind of news. And all of it is just rumors. Also i never agree bitcoin is just created by a single person only. They should be a group.

I'm pretty sorry rawdog  , but everybody who thinks Craig is Satoshi is retard.

Why do we even discuss this topic once again? Because Coindesk decided to strike again with this drama series - "We know who Satoshi is, maybe"?
Until we have real, valid and irrefutable proof that Craig can present to everyone, publicly, confirming his identity as Satoshi, until then I refuse to believe in this rumor.

because confidential Pedersen commitments is their future plans. and because its not yet official, i presume they will deny it even is in the plan and then meander the topic into more maniacal over dramatics by stating they have not added it yet so i must be wrong... rather than admit i see a few steps ahead of what they are ready to admit.
so i left off their future plan to reduce their maniac mindsets of twisting words.

as for how they are paid. well they will denie they are paid to work on bitcoin and deny their blockstream investors have anything to do with bitcoin... more nonsense meandering away from the topic at hand.

so i tried to stick to the point gmaxwell made.. and just highlighted where he failed.... 2mb block vs 4mb weight.. which is bigger.. even a 6yo knows 4 is bigger

I must say you're even better story teller than Craig Wrightoshi himself.

Btw why did you remove the last paragraph from your comment?

We will always see once or two per year, a new theory about who is Satoshi.. With all kind of rumors, conspiracies, legend, ect with or without argument. Right now i searched and i am not suprised to see some results in search engine for "Alex Jones bitcoin" LOL I am going to read a bunch of stuff.

Yeah -- I think maybe Coindesk was having a slow news day.  

yep rational people want dynamic blocks of lean tx's starting at 2mb block buffer limit..

large block maniacs want 4mb weight.

you can spot a maniac when they cant even tell you that 4 is bigger than 2..so will refuse to admit they are the large block maniacs,

if you cant admit that 4 is bigger then 2 and always try to make it sound like 2 is bigger than 4.. then no one should take any notice of other word twisting crap thats said

In this thread, large block maniacs show that their judgement is equally poor in other domains.

you need to know his whole back story.

1. in something like 2013 he told a friend to set up a trust. and the collateral was a bunch of PUBLIC KEYS
he did not show proof of signatures of the PUBLIC keys. he relied on his friends naivity to only check the balances of the PUBLIC KEYS to get a total value to use as collateral.

2. emphasis the friend did not understand bitcoin so thought showing public key was like showing a bank statement as proof enough of holding.

3. then using the TRUST which is then falsely insured for multiple millions of dollars of value. (although it held 0 assets and just a list of random early adopter public keys). that TRUST fund was then used as collateral to then get other investments by FALSELY suggesting it was secured by million of assets. due to an insurance policy insuring the trust.

4. the now invested fund was then used to make other investments..

5. australian authorities questioned the trust so he legged it to england.. then craig contacted media and started his own 'i am satoshi' whispers because the australian government were doubting his trusts assets.

6.  later people have seen that the proof is not proof. but publicly available data.. this has made the first trust funds assets factually reduced to zero. meaning the initial investors will want to drop out. which is snowballing right now like ripples in the water. each level of investment has now realised their funds are not secure.

7. now craig wright is trying to get patents and do book deals, etc to try raising capital and creating assets to bulk up the empty trust to try and salvage some value of that empty trust. purely to avoid civil and possible criminal charges if he ever got deported to australia to have to answer for his actions. he thinks if he can replace the PUBLIC key fake asset with patents and book royalty contracts to then give the trust real value, he can avoid civil/criminal actions by showing the trust holds real value.

That is a weak argument given the intellectual caliber of the people he "conned".

The probability is quite high that he is Satoshi but the surprise unknown coder may shock people even more.  I hope so.  

Where in that video do you Szabo introducing Wright or having any relation to Wright?

And in your second video if you pay attention Wright talks about how one will be able to use things like apps to enhance privacy.  That's as good as you're gonna get in the world of blockchains - sorry if you actually drank the Roger Ver happy juice.