Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 1040. (Read 3917058 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 252
Not mine, but i really need to share it here Tongue


Units Arrived and Unpacked



All Plugged In



Thanks, friedcat !




legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
The 1 satoshi = 1 share isn't completely redudundant in determining number of shares. To prove how many shares you have (which you need to do if you're selling for example) you'd need either the complete dividend amount (is it sent in one transaction?) to work out the percentage, or know what the dividend value per share was. The 1 satoshi per share just simplifies that dramatically.
An ASICMiner-controlled spreadsheet is the right solution for this.

not everyone wants everyone else to see how many shares they have. So no, I don't think this is the solution. There has been a talk about asicminer setting up their own exchange (which would make sense) but I guess the engineers and professionals working for ASICMINER have better things to do right now. I have no doubt it will be implemented in the future though.
How is this any less private than the transaction spam?
The spreadsheet would just contain a number of shares and the address considered to own them...
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler
The 1 satoshi = 1 share isn't completely redudundant in determining number of shares. To prove how many shares you have (which you need to do if you're selling for example) you'd need either the complete dividend amount (is it sent in one transaction?) to work out the percentage, or know what the dividend value per share was. The 1 satoshi per share just simplifies that dramatically.
An ASICMiner-controlled spreadsheet is the right solution for this.

not everyone wants everyone else to see how many shares they have. So no, I don't think this is the solution. There has been a talk about asicminer setting up their own exchange (which would make sense) but I guess the engineers and professionals working for ASICMINER have better things to do right now. I have no doubt it will be implemented in the future though.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
The 1 satoshi = 1 share isn't completely redudundant in determining number of shares. To prove how many shares you have (which you need to do if you're selling for example) you'd need either the complete dividend amount (is it sent in one transaction?) to work out the percentage, or know what the dividend value per share was. The 1 satoshi per share just simplifies that dramatically.
An ASICMiner-controlled spreadsheet is the right solution for this.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
The 1 satoshi = 1 share isn't completely redudundant in determining number of shares. To prove how many shares you have (which you need to do if you're selling for example) you'd need either the complete dividend amount (is it sent in one transaction?) to work out the percentage, or know what the dividend value per share was. The 1 satoshi per share just simplifies that dramatically.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1001
Unlimited Free Crypto
I thought the bitcoin dev team had an update where any transactions under 3 cents or something would not be sent through the blockchain? Or has it not been implemented yet? If so, wouldn't that mean the satoshi confirmations would no longer work?

To be exact the update was about the minimum amount in a tx output to be eligible to be relayed by other nodes and this amount is suggested for around 0.7 of a (p), Can be easily modified by the nodes.
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
I thought the bitcoin dev team had an update where any transactions under 3 cents or something would not be sent through the blockchain? Or has it not been implemented yet? If so, wouldn't that mean the satoshi confirmations would no longer work?
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
Thanks for the slight derail on the Satoshis.  I honestly didn't understand why ASICMiner bothered with them.

Also thanks to rdponticelli for responding with all the points I wanted to say so I didn't have to.  Cool

I guess I should go elsewhere and try to convince the big mining pools to require transaction fees for all transactions.

-- END DERAIL --
sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
ASICMiner is hashing the block chain to shreds the last hour:  Grin

legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Is there a spreadsheet of share holders somewhere?  I thought I saw a Google doc at one point.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io
When does Friedcat usually provide his updates?

Sometimes shortly after dividend... sometimes next day... sometimes not at all. Just watch https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/friedcat-49840
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
When does Friedcat usually provide his updates?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I'd suggest anyone who hasn't, and refuses to return the double div, be blacklisted from btct.co.

thats the dumbest thing i ever heard.  there are ways to correct something like this but solving this with a nazi mentality is far from the best way
sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Our highest capital is the Confidence we build.
Sure, you could kindly ask AM to stop polluting the blockchain, but it would be kind of pointless: other people can still do that, and you're not going to "kindly ask" them all: this is a social dynamic that "just doesn't work".

Handling it as a security/protocol issue is IMAO a better approach, because you really have a chance of success, even if people do not wish (or care) to cooperate.

Other people, any random user, doesn't have 30% of the hashrate. We're talking about one of the big players here, and you know how it goes, with great powers...

But lets stop derailing this thread even more....
inh
full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 100
300 direct shares for sale @ 2.45

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2320707

first come first serve.

Thanks.

We saw you mention this earlier in the thread already...  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler
this is great stuff, it would be even nicer if you were able to incorporate the btcguild hashrate so that we see how much has been mined since the last dividend in total.
Is it known whether ASICMiner will switch to solo mining only?

If this is the case, I will just wait until everything is done as solo mining.

If not, I will look into adding the BTCGuild stats.

sorry, can't help it Smiley



legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
this is great stuff, it would be even nicer if you were able to incorporate the btcguild hashrate so that we see how much has been mined since the last dividend in total.
Is it known whether ASICMiner will switch to solo mining only?

If this is the case, I will just wait until everything is done as solo mining.

If not, I will look into adding the BTCGuild stats.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
Sorry for being rude, but it's for the sake of clearness.

There's no rule nor protocol or law preventing anybody from shitting on their food. There's no need for it, because it's absolutely obvious the inadvisability of doing such a thing...

Now. if ASICMINER wants to shit over the blockchain, it's ok that they're able to do it. I can't see why somebody should go to the hassle of finding a way to stop them. But that's hardly advisable for themselves, considering that they're eating from the blockchain too...
Oh, I partly agree, you're not being rude.

Point is, you're looking at this problem as if it could be considered a "social" problem, while I look at it as if it was a "security" problem.

Sure, you could kindly ask AM to stop polluting the blockchain, but it would be kind of pointless: other people can still do that, and you're not going to "kindly ask" them all: this is a social dynamic that "just doesn't work".

Handling it as a security/protocol issue is IMAO a better approach, because you really have a chance of success, even if people do not wish (or care) to cooperate.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
the satoshi confirmation is good, whats wrong with that? it helps by clearly showing how much shares are connected to the address,
thats why we have satoshis and small transactions, so this kind of stuff will be possible, thats the whole point about bitcoin and being decentrialized, so you can send how much you want to who ever you want with nobody else telling you your not allowed, or no1 else trying to stop you,
thats the whole idea about bitcoin.... lol
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler

Sorry for being rude, but it's for the sake of clearness.

There's no rule nor protocol or law preventing anybody from shitting on their food. There's no need for it, because it's absolutely obvious the inadvisability of doing such a thing...

Now. if ASICMINER wants to shit over the blockchain, it's ok that they're able to do it. I can't see why somebody should go to the hassle of finding a way to stop them. But that's hardly advisable for themselves, considering that they're eating from the blockchain too...

come on. This is not shitting in the blockchain. It makes sense that the company ASICMINER is sending out a message about how many shares you hold any given week. And anyway, why is every bitcoin issue always discussed in this thread? The 51 percent issue, now the blockchain spam/size. This thread is about ASICMINER so please keep on the topic.

I finally finished coding the calculations of the 24-hour, 3-day and 7-day average hash rates for solo mining. You can view it here:

http://runeks.dk/bitcoin/

The graph looks like this:



As you can see, we've seen a significant ramp-up in the solo hash rate in the past couple of days.

24-hour average is quite jumpy, but it seems we're sailing at a comfortable cruise speed of around 17 Thash/s right now.

Oh, and the chart updates every time new ASICMiner blocks come in, although you'll have to refresh the page to see the changes.

this is great stuff, it would be even nicer if you were able to incorporate the btcguild hashrate so that we see how much has been mined since the last dividend in total.
Jump to: