ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 300.

explorer

legendary

Activity: 2016

Merit: 1259

Quote from: xhomerx10 on June 20, 2014, 07:54:43 PM

Quote from: arousedrhino on June 20, 2014, 06:20:18 PM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 20, 2014, 03:19:06 PM

Quote from: jjdub7 on June 20, 2014, 02:05:09 PM

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

They need better customer service. Transfer of shares took 9 days last time, now transferring to havelock, which will take who knows how long. This is why they need the shares to be on havelock or counterparty, or figure out a way to make it easier for investors to trade holdings.

And dividends are a must, this is a crypto stock, very high risk. If they can't pay a decent dividend, the price should be much lower than it is even now.

A week and a half is not long at all for transferring shares.

Stocks are leading indicators not lagging.

Stock market returns are leading indicators. Thankfully, they are not always accurate. Let's hope they are not accurate in the case of Asicminer shares.

I don't know about that. AM has returned multiple times the IPO price per share in the first year. That seems a pretty good indication. On what scale do you find that to be a bad indication?

xhomerx10

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 7912

Quote from: arousedrhino on June 20, 2014, 06:20:18 PM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 20, 2014, 03:19:06 PM

Quote from: jjdub7 on June 20, 2014, 02:05:09 PM

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

They need better customer service. Transfer of shares took 9 days last time, now transferring to havelock, which will take who knows how long. This is why they need the shares to be on havelock or counterparty, or figure out a way to make it easier for investors to trade holdings.

And dividends are a must, this is a crypto stock, very high risk. If they can't pay a decent dividend, the price should be much lower than it is even now.

A week and a half is not long at all for transferring shares.

Stocks are leading indicators not lagging.

Stock market returns are leading indicators. Thankfully, they are not always accurate. Let's hope they are not accurate in the case of Asicminer shares.

arousedrhino

sr. member

Activity: 347

Merit: 250

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 20, 2014, 03:19:06 PM

Quote from: jjdub7 on June 20, 2014, 02:05:09 PM

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

They need better customer service. Transfer of shares took 9 days last time, now transferring to havelock, which will take who knows how long. This is why they need the shares to be on havelock or counterparty, or figure out a way to make it easier for investors to trade holdings.

And dividends are a must, this is a crypto stock, very high risk. If they can't pay a decent dividend, the price should be much lower than it is even now.

A week and a half is not long at all for transferring shares.

Stocks are leading indicators not lagging.

jjdub7

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 502

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 20, 2014, 03:19:06 PM

Quote from: jjdub7 on June 20, 2014, 02:05:09 PM

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

They need better customer service. Transfer of shares took 9 days last time, now transferring to havelock, which will take who knows how long. This is why they need the shares to be on havelock or counterparty, or figure out a way to make it easier for investors to trade holdings.

And dividends are a must, this is a crypto stock, very high risk. If they can't pay a decent dividend, the price should be much lower than it is even now.

They need better investor communications - "customer service" would be their relationship management with their large purchasers (Rockminer & Datatank at the moment).

If they only have enough resources to manage one of the two, I'd rather it be the actual customers. While answering investor questions might bump the share price up, friedcat's main priority should be to focus on running the core business processes in AM's profit centers - investor relations is a service center at best, if not a downright cost.

Granted, I also request that shareholder questions be answered on a monthly basis.

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1094

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Quote from: bitcoin.newsfeed on June 20, 2014, 04:00:42 PM

I propose next round of shareholders questions to be scheduled on 1st of July 2014, and I feel it will be mainly about dividends this time, since we've got answers for almost everything last time. This will also be exactly 1 month since last round of shareholders questions.

That sounds like a good date to me and Friedcat responds on the second of July so some people can Enjoy the BBQ in Canada since it is a holiday

That means it should be time to take more shareholder questions
Most of the ones I have are their relationships with other companies than about AM chips atm
- Rockxie Miner
- Datatank Miner
- Bitgarden Miner
- Estimated Chips Sold etc.

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: bitcoin.newsfeed on June 20, 2014, 04:00:42 PM

I propose next round of shareholders questions to be scheduled on 1st of July 2014, and I feel it will be mainly about dividends this time, since we've got answers for almost everything last time. This will also be exactly 1 month since last round of shareholders questions.

+1

I'd also like to know more about the plans for franchising and solomining.

bitcoin.newsfeed

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

I propose next round of shareholders questions to be scheduled on 1st of July 2014, and I feel it will be mainly about dividends this time, since we've got answers for almost everything last time. This will also be exactly 1 month since last round of shareholders questions.

meanwhile we can also summarize what changed between then and now, like

- The Open Source Block Erupter Project
- announced cooperation with DataTank
.
.
.

mc_lovin

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

www.bitcointrading.com

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 20, 2014, 03:19:06 PM

Quote from: jjdub7 on June 20, 2014, 02:05:09 PM

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

They need better customer service. Transfer of shares took 9 days last time, now transferring to havelock, which will take who knows how long. This is why they need the shares to be on havelock or counterparty, or figure out a way to make it easier for investors to trade holdings.

And dividends are a must, this is a crypto stock, very high risk. If they can't pay a decent dividend, the price should be much lower than it is even now.

Long share transfer times? You must be new here

As long as they go through eventually, no need to panic.

As for divs... We all want them, begging probably won't help although I wish it did.

AcoinL.L.C

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jjdub7 on June 20, 2014, 02:05:09 PM

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

They need better customer service. Transfer of shares took 9 days last time, now transferring to havelock, which will take who knows how long. This is why they need the shares to be on havelock or counterparty, or figure out a way to make it easier for investors to trade holdings.

And dividends are a must, this is a crypto stock, very high risk. If they can't pay a decent dividend, the price should be much lower than it is even now.

jjdub7

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 502

Quote from: spartan82 on June 19, 2014, 09:40:18 AM

Why not just keep pumping the money back into the company and receive yearly dividends every Christmas? I'm all for it

keep the funds FC, make it a fatter payout at the end of the year for us lol

I actually wouldn't mind this either. I'd like to see FC diversify a bit and start a holdings unit as a second line of business just to give us some wiggle room and stabilize prices. What's your take on that Friedcat Buffett?

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Q2 coming to a close.

Whtwabbit

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 266

95% loss but still an OK investment in fiat terms

NotLambchop

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 254

Quote from: KarmaShark on June 20, 2014, 07:52:52 AM

...flushed out all the weak hands who want to dump their positions at a loss on the eve of dividends? Opportunity is knocking here.

The eve has been canceled, no divs 4 U.
Also: That's not opportunity, that's some creepy d00d knocking. Stranger danger!

KarmaShark

hero member

Activity: 617

Merit: 559

Quote from: aahzmundus on June 20, 2014, 06:52:09 AM

Quote from: data on June 20, 2014, 06:31:22 AM

I am more hurting from the whole 95% drop Wink

I read this and thought to myself... no way, it is not a 95% drop...

Then I did the math, and cried. At least I did sell SOME of my shares to diversify near the top. I remember when I dumped my shares on BTCT to buy direct shares from Jart's auction at ~4.5... That was probably the most BTC I ever held, or ever will hold. Oh hindsight!

Some investors have been absolutely devastated, all part of the Wild West. Will the share price slowly sink back down to IPO or have we flushed out all the weak hands who want to dump their positions at a loss on the eve of dividends? Opportunity is knocking here.

aahzmundus

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io

Quote from: data on June 20, 2014, 06:31:22 AM

I am more hurting from the whole 95% drop Wink

I read this and thought to myself... no way, it is not a 95% drop...

Then I did the math, and cried. At least I did sell SOME of my shares to diversify near the top. I remember when I dumped my shares on BTCT to buy direct shares from Jart's auction at ~4.5... That was probably the most BTC I ever held, or ever will hold. Oh hindsight!

data

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

I am more hurting from the whole 95% drop Wink

kingcrimson

legendary

Activity: 1025

Merit: 1000

66 % share price drop still stinging, that is what, hundreds of millions? I hope they will be able to compete. They look pretty good on paper but so did everything.

minerpumpkin

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night

Aww, nice 100 shares wall, we bearely knew ya Cry

Ozziecoin

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: KarmaShark on June 19, 2014, 10:41:16 AM

If dividends do not come in July it is likely due to the sales of chips. If the 60PH is 1 to 1.5 months of stock, inventory may not be completely moved until mid to late July, plus conversion to BTC. I am sure the question of "When do you anticipate AM to become cash flow positive?" will come up in the next round of shareholder questions. My guess is as good as anyone else's on when the company enters into that mode.

After FC sells several container loads of chips to DataTank. Cheesy

KarmaShark

hero member

Activity: 617

Merit: 559

If dividends do not come in July it is likely due to the sales of chips. If the 60PH is 1 to 1.5 months of stock, inventory may not be completely moved until mid to late July, plus conversion to BTC. I am sure the question of "When do you anticipate AM to become cash flow positive?" will come up in the next round of shareholder questions. My guess is as good as anyone else's on when the company enters into that mode.

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 300. (Read 3917468 times)