Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 609. (Read 3917468 times)

This will not affect the dividends for some time I am sure. Everyone seems to price shares by the dividends. That being said, I expect the share prices to languish until the dividends explode. By then it will be too late to get on the bandwagon, as always occurs.

Buy when there is blood on the streets. It is pennies on the dollar.

Give it a few weeks to set in.  They need to start producing

AM will rise once again. 

FC changed the game. Again.

Strange to see so little excitement over this development, it is pretty significant. Being the first to create such a large ASIC farm, AM naturally encountered problems quite early that others will face eventually (or are currently facing) -- and saw the opportunity to solve it, then package the solution for others to benefit.

The brilliance of this move may not be obvious at the moment -- someone running a few mining boxes in their mother's basement is unlikely to encounter these problems -- but as mining becomes more professionalized, lowering their costs with a solution like this may be the only way to be profitable.

Yes. And AM is the only company showing sings of trying to implement a strategy for years, not months, into the future. This is endgame stuff.

yeah just a $3000 container and some  bottles of fluorinert. lol
for the record, similar solutions exist commercially, and are sold (in containers) for $2.per watt.  that's more affordable than a brick and mortar datacenter but the price of the container itself doesn't really matter

I would also dispute that datacenters suitable for mining  don't exist  the requirements for hpc and gpu compute are quite similar.

Block mined today.

Thanks! I had missed that... 

i think he's referring to this:

What are you referring to? Franchising? Or did I miss something?

I think the most overlooked statement is that there are currently no commercial data centers available that are designed to to handle the requirements of of a world-class farm. And definitely none that can scale to the farms of the future.

The brick wall that AM hit was not an inability to create chips and boards. It was finding a place to put them. The datacenters of today were not designed for the sort of high-heat high-density equipment that make bitcoin mining profitable. They were built for commercial servers and hard drive arrays... very different. Trying to build a mining farm can quickly overwhelm the resources and capacity of a datacenter built for common blade servers. Expansion starts to get really expensive when you count electricity, cooling, and especially infrastucture and even the building itself.

So he solved it.

Building? Poof, it's gone. Replaced by a $3000 shipping container. Cooling? 97% of costs eliminated. Not just high density of chips, but high density of boards. The very definition of optimization.

AM is doing for farms what ASIC technology did to video cards. Making anyone using generic facilities outdated, under-performing, uncompetitive, and obsolete.

He created ASCF: Application-Specific Computing Facility. (Coined here first!)

FC is so far ahead of the curve he is beyond the horizon.

One thing no one has mentioned and i would like to hear opinion on.

With immersion cooling (I expect) the temperature is constant, deviating only slightly from the boiling point of the liquid.  Air is different because its low heat conductance, the more btu output the hotter the chip gets because it can't be carried away quickly.  With such high thermal densities being tested above this won't be a problem.

So what will being able to lock the chips temperature in at a cool 40C be?
(Marginally?) More efficient?
Over clocking potential?

The writeup mentions a longer timeline for large scale production but maybe a consumer device (enclosed cube) with immersion cooling is doable and possibly improves w/GH? Wishful thinking?

Also, could this rescue a gen2 design which had poor thermal properties?

It's just a little silence before storm. It will flatter in 50PH range....

Sure, but it would still only be 1.58% of the power consumption as long as you dont need AC. Which of course isnt likely, but if you followed the thread, that was my point.

Try putting 10, 50, 100 or 1000 of them in a room and you will see what "statistical noise" sounds and feels like.

How much do you think the low speed fans on a KNC Jupiter consume ? 2W per fan? Total of 8W. 12W if you count the case fans which KnC users disconnect because they (weirdly) get better performance at higher temperatures. 12W out of a total of ~650W at the wall is 1.58%. Thats not massive in my book, thats statistical noise.


Yes, I was confusing with hashfast which claim 400GH per chip. Not that the comparison with KnC's 100GH chip looks so good.


They all use the same chip. Its not because a blade contains 32 asics that the per asic performance is somehow better, nor that 32 asics would cost less than 32x the price of 1 asic.


Who cares? Someone buying it may care, but as a sharesholder dont you understand your company is selling 96 asics (+PCB, assembly, etc) for ~$500 ? <$5 per chip whereas hashfast is charging $1500 for a module.  How much do you think these chips cost to produce?


Hu?

You are correct, but that effect is so marginal, particularly for bitcoin asics running at 100% load, so dynamic power is so much more important than leakage, it can be safely ignored in this context.

First of all it does "magically" make the chips more efficient because they don't need a massive fan hogging up all the electricity. When you consider how much energy is spent keeping the chips cool, a 97% reduction would have an enormous effect on efficiency and power density.

Secondly, I think you are confusing knc rigs with chips. There is no such thing as a 400gh chip. Also by 0.3gh I assume you mean the usb which is by far the least efficient asic by asicminer.

Thirdly both asicminers new cube and kncs fastest miner have nearly the same ROI. This means when asicminer does get 28nm chips like knc they will be much more efficient due to manufacturing costs being lower and immersion cooling.

Actually, it does. All else equal a cooler chip can work at lower voltage due to lower current leakage.

But I don't know what the actual increase in efficiency would be in the case of BEs.

Now is probably good time to switch back to pool mining