Pages:
Author

Topic: ASICs are the reason the price is dropping, and it will not stop. - page 2. (Read 5243 times)

sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 251
My prediction is that price will continue to drop until the market will be overwhelmed with asic meaning everyone could buy them without waiting in line for preoder. The difficulty would sky rocket and price would increase once more.
sr. member
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
I'm always grumpy in the morning.
I'm so sick of these "price is dropping because of X" bullshit threads. Price is dropping because it had no business being $150+ in the first place. It's way too early for that kind of valuation compared to actual current use as currency. It was a BUBBLE, and bubbles always pop.

I'm sick of the "Price had no business being 150+" threads. What would be a fair price for a random unit of a currency backed by ... nothing?  No economy, no product, no army?  This is so frickin' arbitrary.

I'm not arguing from a fundamental value perspective, sorry if my original wording was a bit harsh. What I mean is that from a technical perspective, seeing how quickly the price rose from say $30 to $150+, it was pretty clear from day one that this was a bubble. At least clear to me, been watching other markets for a few years and I've seen this movie before. Exponential rises never end well in the short term.

So from that technical perspective it's "natural" that we deflate back to eg. $30-$50 for a while, it doesn't need any external explanation. It also isn't necessarily bearish long term for Bitcoin.
full member
Activity: 256
Merit: 100
Risk-hedging platform for cryptocurrency investors
Basically what OP is pointing towards despite his strange numbers, is over saturation... More coins and not as much demand equals low value.

It is this simple, and there is no need to make overly complex assumptions. Roughly 3,600 new coins are created every day. There must be demand for 3,600 new coins every day for price to stay steady. We just fell off a period of massive amounts of panic buying. Most panic buyers have sold out at this point. However, for price to rise again, we're going to have to wait for more infrastructure and useful functions to come out of bitcoin. And they are coming. Patience is a virtue.

http://thegenesisblock.com/significant-merchant-improvements-planned-for-bitcoin-v0-9/

Agreed, and thanks for the link!

+1

& approx 3600 BTC / day is one of the fundamental. It was the case when there was only CPU mining or GPU mining and it will be the case when there will be just ASIC miners. I understand ppl are upset because they don't have the same income what they had earlier. It is an evolution, be part of it or... Just use your hard earned coins (trade, purchase, hold-on, etc.) and see where the price will go...

Don't forget you joined to this club because you believe in it (not the price but the idea). If you lost your faith you can leave at any time.

legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
Basically what OP is pointing towards despite his strange numbers, is over saturation... More coins and not as much demand equals low value.

It is this simple, and there is no need to make overly complex assumptions. Roughly 3,600 new coins are created every day. There must be demand for 3,600 new coins every day for price to stay steady. We just fell off a period of massive amounts of panic buying. Most panic buyers have sold out at this point. However, for price to rise again, we're going to have to wait for more infrastructure and useful functions to come out of bitcoin. And they are coming. Patience is a virtue.

http://thegenesisblock.com/significant-merchant-improvements-planned-for-bitcoin-v0-9/

Agreed, and thanks for the link!
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Martijn Meijering
And as the price drops nobody who isn't an idiot will consider holding coins as an investment

Not true, it will only dissuade those who were looking for a quick buck. If you believe BTC will be very valuable ten years from now, or at least has a decent chance of being very valuable, then lower prices may in fact lead you to spend more fiat money on buying BTC than you might otherwise have.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Martijn Meijering
hero member
Activity: 715
Merit: 500
Basically what OP is pointing towards despite his strange numbers, is over saturation... More coins and not as much demand equals low value.

It is this simple, and there is no need to make overly complex assumptions. Roughly 3,600 new coins are created every day. There must be demand for 3,600 new coins every day for price to stay steady. We just fell off a period of massive amounts of panic buying. Most panic buyers have sold out at this point. However, for price to rise again, we're going to have to wait for more infrastructure and useful functions to come out of bitcoin. And they are coming. Patience is a virtue.

http://thegenesisblock.com/significant-merchant-improvements-planned-for-bitcoin-v0-9/
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
price dropping is shaking out weak asic
holders as people hold longer and hash rices so will price. As asics get cheaper the incentive to hold will be higher so we are finding the equilibrium between cheap
btc and cheap asics through market price discovery. I already predicted all of this to happen so lets see how it keeps playing out.
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
Rigggght so all that asset protection literature no longer exists and now it's only miners that set price. You think those goldbugs have just disappeared from the planet and now they invest in stocks and bonds. Its not like anyone with money won't be interested in something finite and easily transportable. And a 10 million investment in ASIC, isn't that 1 dollar rise, so if a billion was invested in ASIC that'd explain the 100 dollar valuation!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Basically what OP is pointing towards despite his strange numbers, is over saturation. Anyone that has played an MMO and knows how a virtual economy works this is the same exact thing. More coins and not as much demand equals low value. As demand rises and coins disperse amongst the market, price goes up (Difficulty is the big player despite what people think). However the key factor is demand, if there is no demand/trade. There is no value, thus it continues to fall. This is parallel to the market I have projected towards BTC. Problem is, this is the key part and if it goes wrong. My whole idea is out the window.
legendary
Activity: 3976
Merit: 1421
Life, Love and Laughter...
Nature abhors a vacuum

Economics abhors a magic machine that prints money.

Here's what the network will look like at the end of 2013.  Here's what the exchange rate will be set (forced) to by ASICminer and the few others fighting over ASICminer's scraps dumping their coins desperately trying to claw their way to make ROI

Incoming hashrates:

ASICminer = 800 - 1000 TH
Avalon Chips = 300 TH
Avalon Batch 2 = 30 TH
KNCMiner=  200 - 400 TH
BFL = 100 - 1000 TH

Hash rate : 1430 TH/sec - 2730 TH/sec

Difficulty : 203396803 - 388302987


If ROI is fast (i.e. meets 100% ROI in less than a year) because exchange rate is good, difficulty will go up to compensate as people want to buy magic money making machines

if exchange rate is sane, difficulty will not go up because ROI is normal, i.e. one year.  This is what is happening now.  This is what will continue to happen.  So let's see what the exchange rate will be to make ROI sane @ 1 year


Marginal rate for plebs to buy hardware (KNC miner) : 17,500$ per TH/sec.

Price of BTC if set by plebs

Low diff: 49$
Max diff: 93$

Marginal rate for ASICminer to buy hardware : <10,000$ per TH/sec.  We'll be conservative and use 10,000$.  In reality it's probably closer to 5,000$, which means halve these numbers.

Price of BTC when set by ASICminer

Low diff: 11$
Max diff: 21$


Asicminer controls the price of bitcoin.  They are the reason the price has dropped.  It is impossible for anyone to get ANYWHERE near their level of efficiency except the ASIC designers themselves.  All of who currently charge an order of magnitude more for their chips than they actually pay for them.  ASICminer can get their chips for pennies on the dollar compared to you, and pays next to nothing for their industrial electricity.

There is nowhere near enough demand to buy coins to make up for the massive amount mined and dumped on a constant basis.  The exchange rate will continue to plummet until the value of dumped coins actually meets the amount of money flowing in for goods and services (practically non-existant at this time.)

And as the price drops nobody who isn't an idiot will consider holding coins as an investment

TL;DR - Unless YOU are ASICMiner, or you got an ASIC already (Avalon Batch #1) - You are screwed.  No, don't buy coins either, the price is going to keep dropping.

Oh, bonus points.  They EASILY have enough hardware to 51% the network.  They could break 75%.

angry gpu miner confirmed.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Throw a paper BTC wallet worth $1000 USD on the ground in any country and then throw a $100 USD bill on the ground next to it and see which one people "kill" each other to get to.

When the day comes that they go for the paper wallet, you can start comparing BTC to USD.  When the day comes that you can put a $100 wallet next to $100 bill and they go for the wallet, BTC will have won.  

Until then, King Dollar reigns supreme.   Cool
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
The central bank create the fiat money and lend them out, those money will finance different project to create job/product/service and improve the economy

But as central banks in bitcoin economy(miner), they create the money but sell them in exchange for some other foreign currencies, because currently the bitcoin's value is too low

FED print 2.8 Billion new USD each day but bitcoin generate only 3600 new coins, how could this amount of coin drive any significant economy activity?
Because USD has orders of magnitude larger trade volume and use than BTC, i wonder what it looks like if you compare the 2.8 B USD to the total amount of USD in existence/circulation, and the 3600 coins compared to the total amount in existence/circulation
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
The central bank create the fiat money and lend them out, those money will finance different project to create job/product/service and improve the economy

But as central banks in bitcoin economy(miner), they create the money but sell them in exchange for some other foreign currencies, because currently the bitcoin's value is too low

FED print 2.8 Billion new USD each day but bitcoin generate only 3600 new coins, how could this amount of coin drive any significant economy activity?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
How is that a pseudo-floor? The causality appears to run in the wrong direction for that.
It's a psuedo floor in the sense that if you have a GPU, and it costs you 300$ to mine 200$ worth of BTC, economics dictates that instead of doing that, you'll buy 200$ worth of BTC and save the 100$.

But it's unclear how this will work with ASICs since so few people have them compared to GPUs, and for probably several years they will always make more $ than they cost in electricity.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Martijn Meijering
How is that a pseudo-floor? The causality appears to run in the wrong direction for that.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I'm so sick of these "price is dropping because of X" bullshit threads. Price is dropping because it had no business being $150+ in the first place. It's way too early for that kind of valuation compared to actual current use as currency. It was a BUBBLE, and bubbles always pop.

I'm sick of the "Price had no business being 150+" threads. What would be a fair price for a random unit of a currency backed by ... nothing?  No economy, no product, no army?  This is so frickin' arbitrary.
There WAS a psuedo-floor to the price with GPUs, namely that many miners would not mine if the cost of electricity was more than the current market value of the coins they would get.

this did not set the exchange rate, but it did have a massive influence on people buying hardware, if not outright operating it.  people buy miners when ROI looks good, and GPU miners they would turn off if price was too low.

but ASICs are so power efficient, that this "price too low" is like, 3$/coin.  so the psuedo-floor has fallen dramatically.

So basically, if the price fell below price of electricty, people had to buy coins, they couldn't mine.  But why were they buying coins?  #1 - Because they were buying BTC Asics, #2 - investment, price going up.

Since ASICs basically will never turn off, anyone with them will keep them on all the time.  If you have an asic, you won't buy coins.  but the bigger problem is with the void of people no longer buying BTC for miners (or anything else) the exchange rate is going back to normal.  which only further puts pressure on people to sell coins to meet ROI
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
I'm so sick of these "price is dropping because of X" bullshit threads. Price is dropping because it had no business being $150+ in the first place. It's way too early for that kind of valuation compared to actual current use as currency. It was a BUBBLE, and bubbles always pop.

I'm sick of the "Price had no business being 150+" threads. What would be a fair price for a random unit of a currency backed by ... nothing?  No economy, no product, no army?  This is so frickin' arbitrary.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Thanks for the original post - I was wondering why is the price going down for some time...

As I read through the whole thread - would not the solution to this problem be if we changed the alghorithm behind Bitcoin so those ASIC can't mine it and everyone had to downgrade to the CPU or at best GPU level?

I thought that this is built-in procedure if anything goes wrong (ie. 51% attack, some vulnerability found etc..) and OP says ASIC is waaaaay over the 51% atm so it might be a good idea to put ASICs out of the game.
Changing the protocol isn't an option, that just kills the coin entirely. 
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Martijn Meijering
If I understood it correctly there is intention to do a split so two alghorithms are used at once at rate of 50:50? It might not be that bad idea, right?

It sounds like a good idea to me, though it is too early to tell whether it will be necessary. Right now it's probably not a viable option, because most Bitcoin users would prefer not to have a fork and because the fact that it isn't self-evidently necessary would likely cause a fork.
Pages:
Jump to: