Topic: Ask The Bounty Team before joining - page 3. (Read 909 times)
Yes, to change or add new rules and requirements for the participants of the bounty campaign is not good. But what can you do bounty hunters participate without contracts, all relationships are built on trust. Manipulation from the creators of projects not excluded.
Recently, I just had this bad experience with a bounty campaign I joined (Vanta to be specific). They've extended the campaign, added some task, and threatened participants that they'll not get all the bounty rewards if they won't participate. I raised my concerns to the bounty manager and I was quite disappointed with the response.
To all fellow hunters, you may want to ask this questions to your bounty managers before joining a campaign:
1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?
2. ICO team inserting rules after the campaign
- Will the team allow ICO teams add rules like exchange voting and require hunters to participate?
- What would be the bounty team's response if ICO teams would withhold the bounty rewards to force hunters to participate?
These questions might help you understand how strong the bounty manager is when it comes to protecting its group of bounty hunters.
Disclaimer: I've also posted a similar topic in other forums I'm into. In case someone checks my post for plagiarism
You should not just join in an bounty, you should have knowledge about the bounty that you are going to join before you participate. You will just waste your time if you will participate in bounty campaign that have poor team. To all fellow hunters, you may want to ask this questions to your bounty managers before joining a campaign:
1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?
2. ICO team inserting rules after the campaign
- Will the team allow ICO teams add rules like exchange voting and require hunters to participate?
- What would be the bounty team's response if ICO teams would withhold the bounty rewards to force hunters to participate?
These questions might help you understand how strong the bounty manager is when it comes to protecting its group of bounty hunters.
Disclaimer: I've also posted a similar topic in other forums I'm into. In case someone checks my post for plagiarism
They cannot and will not answer that, for the simple reason that they have no control it's the main developer who will and can give instruction and besides they can change the rule anytime depending on the situation of the token sales, Ico is really a big risk for bounty hunters in the current state.
Most times, when you ask some sensitive questions, they may not answer you. Their response might even be that, if you are not comfortable with their rules, you should not bother joining. They do this, when they already have so much participants.
The only way bounty hunters can overcome this, is when we area unified in our decisions.
The only way bounty hunters can overcome this, is when we area unified in our decisions.
For me it is more important if bounty hunters need to pass KYC and if the token pool is held in an escrow, to protect yourself that you will surely receive your reward.
There was no guarantee until the token will be sending to the escrow address, remember about doing KYC doesn't mean if you will receive your token smoothly dude. I should remind you there was a bunch of platforms have a lot of problem with KYC dude.
In terms of bonus expansion, they are unable to do anything but wait for information from the group. If they still want to expand the bounty campaign, keep the bounty pool intact. We still have to depend on them
Yes, I am going to ask bounty community managers before joining bounty, because they analyze project well and can recommend something to me
For me it is more important if bounty hunters need to pass KYC and if the token pool is held in an escrow, to protect yourself that you will surely receive your reward.
Recently, I just had this bad experience with a bounty campaign I joined (Vanta to be specific). They've extended the campaign, added some task, and threatened participants that they'll not get all the bounty rewards if they won't participate. I raised my concerns to the bounty manager and I was quite disappointed with the response.
To all fellow hunters, you may want to ask this questions to your bounty managers before joining a campaign:
1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?
2. ICO team inserting rules after the campaign
- Will the team allow ICO teams add rules like exchange voting and require hunters to participate?
- What would be the bounty team's response if ICO teams would withhold the bounty rewards to force hunters to participate?
These questions might help you understand how strong the bounty manager is when it comes to protecting its group of bounty hunters.
Disclaimer: I've also posted a similar topic in other forums I'm into. In case someone checks my post for plagiarism
Those can be use as our guaranty for the future of the bounty, with all the answer that the manager give us, but it won't be that easy to get the best answer from the bounty manager, cos they don't have absolute power to intervene what the bounty would be. To all fellow hunters, you may want to ask this questions to your bounty managers before joining a campaign:
1. Bounty campaign extension
- Will the team ask for an increase in the bounty pool?
- Will the team close the registration and allow only those participants prior to extension?
2. ICO team inserting rules after the campaign
- Will the team allow ICO teams add rules like exchange voting and require hunters to participate?
- What would be the bounty team's response if ICO teams would withhold the bounty rewards to force hunters to participate?
These questions might help you understand how strong the bounty manager is when it comes to protecting its group of bounty hunters.
Disclaimer: I've also posted a similar topic in other forums I'm into. In case someone checks my post for plagiarism
The team behind the project are the responsible for any changes in the original plan/requirements, the bounty manager is the only one implementing it.
That means in the beginning he/she will never know the plans of the team and is unable to answer the questions of the bounty hunters firmly.
Unfortunately this scenarios are often happening and we are the ones who is suffering from such decision because if you dont follow their additional rules you wont get your rewards.
That means in the beginning he/she will never know the plans of the team and is unable to answer the questions of the bounty hunters firmly.
Unfortunately this scenarios are often happening and we are the ones who is suffering from such decision because if you dont follow their additional rules you wont get your rewards.
I agree with you that we should ask the bounty team before joining because it will help us make good decisions when joining that bounty! For me, I often participate in projects that have reputable managers and their rules are very clear
Some rules are changed are applied during the bounty, so even the team or the manager will not be able to answer some questions like that. Most bounties end after the ICO and ICO end date are sometimes extended due to not reaching the soft cap or targeted cap during the ICO stage.
True, before we enter a project deeper, you must know about the project first. So you don't regret later if something happens.
Asking about the extension of the bounties to the bounty manager will not help at many times because they are not aware of the sales effectiveness so they will continue to manage and run the campaign until the team ask them to close it.Better join on the bounties run by reputed managers to avoid scams.
the problem is right now if we do not ask the bounty project team, do not join the project carelessly because now there are so many projects that are deceptive or that there are no prizes that we get
There's no way we would ask such a ridiculous thing. sometimes, the Bounty Manager has provided a pinned message. Moreover, Bounty Manager has nothing to do with the questions you mentioned. Something like that, it's better to ask directly to the ICO Team. The Bounty Manager only answers bounty questions.
Unfortunately bounty hunters are not protected in any way, and team project can change the rules already during the bounty of the company, you need to be ready for this. In particular Vanta promised more tokens for the implementation of the new task. Nothing complicated, so I support them.
we are aware that there are always a disclaimers in bounty rules that bounty managers and admins has the authority to revised their rules anytime they want. And this really give headache to bounty hunters.
Its normal to revise a rule but its not usual if they modify the rules all the time because that is considered shady .
Even you will ask the bounty managers the question you are posted here they can't give you guarantee that there answers may be applicable
Why not ? If they wont answer your queries . that is again considered shady .
Lastly , there is no point of asking the bounty team before joining their ico because they already laid out all of the infos that are frequently asked .
Cryptomarket was dip in the long term period we see that. So ICO projects not get enough respond from investors that's why normally team will be decide to coin sale extend. Bounty manager never want to bounty extend it is dev decision. Some project increase bounty pool after extend.
Yes gather some information from the team but the best thing to do is to do your own research about the project. because the choice is yours don't depends on what some are saying on the group but make research , because now there are a lot of scam bounties.
Recently, I just had this bad experience with a bounty campaign I joined (Vanta to be specific). They've extended the campaign, added some task, and threatened participants that they'll not get all the bounty rewards if they won't participate. I raised my concerns to the bounty manager and I was quite disappointed with the response.
actually all bounty hunters that have a participation on some uncertain projects on the bounty section had the same experience wherein very dissapointed and frustrated because of that reason when it comes distribution of the rewards. And even though participants provide negative statement to the owner they always ignored it and continue making excuses . However if this issue always occur in some projects then much better to create an article about it or publish a post iespecially here in forum in my opinion m so that everyone can prevent joining such project that always make excuses just to scam investors and bounty hunter. Jump to: