Brother, why are you wasting your energy on these people as nothing is going to change. Ask Yahoo to manage 1xbit from now onwards, suddenly you will see that 1xbit is the best
Poor people.
No, that wouldn't happen. You're completely ignorant of DT members as a whole and of the history of conflicts between some of them. If Yahoo62278 started managing a campaign for 1xbit right now, the community (including DT members) would turn on him so fast it would make your clueless little head spin so fast that it would probably improve your cognitive function.
1) the DT members and chip mixer forces are united and they won't take any action among themselves.
2) their contribution and target of these forces is to tag you. the more tags they can give, the better for them.
3) they earn around 4-5$ per post and if others even earn a penny from a single post, their asses get burnt
4) 90% of the forum users hate them but those who are clean trust will never speak against them because they don't wana hurt their accounts. A bitter truth.
1) Wrong. I don't even know half the members who are in the Chipmixer campaign. You obviously haven't even looked at the spreadsheet, else you wouldn't have written what you did in your point #3, because it states how much participants make per post. Same for DT; there's no united front aligned against...whoever you're talking about. But if you mean they tag scammers, that's mostly true. Obviously you're still upset about your negative trust, but I'm sure in time you'll get over it.
2) Well, you got tagged. But that doesn't mean DT members strive to tag as many members as they can. And don't you realize how many scammers there are on this forum? What have you done about any of that? Most likely nothing.
3) Addressed.
4) Yeah, OK. That's a made up statistic based on your resentment at having bright red trust. And please, if DT members tag people because they've received criticism, they're going to be excluded from trust lists and most likely won't be on DT for long. I've excluded JollyGood for doing that and similar wrongly-left negs, and I'm on DT. Do you think I'm in cahoots with him or anyone else?
Actually I would be OK with it if yahoo managed the 1xbit campaign because he would probably kick your spammy asses out. If 1xbit is going to be here regardless of whether the community approves of it, that seems like the next best option. All you're really doing is confirming that yahoo was actually doing a good thing by managing the Yobit campaign.
See, that I disagree with. Yobit was going to be here regardless of having a campaign manager, but the problem was that they were hiring
hundreds of participants, and there needed to be someone to control the amount of shitposts. That isn't the case with 1xbit as far as I know, i.e., they have a cap on the number of participants in their campaign. If Yahoo62278 started managing their campaign, I know I'd have a problem with that.