Topic: AT is a technology designed for any blockchain - it is not an alt! - page 2. (Read 2377 times)

The mods don't care (that is clear enough already).

If you guys think that a technology created to do Turing complete txs across any blockchain is just some alt-coin then fine - you lose (this very forum represents the "old world" that we are going to replace anyway).

Like hilariousandco told, PM the mods or else, it might be moved again.


You have a project to advertise. We don't have things like that and also, persons who use paid signatures aren't always spammers and also, they might not have enough money to live with.

   -MZ

It was put in a part where other projects that "might be in the future of Bitcoin are allowed" so if I am not allowed then please remove every other topic that also isn't part of Bitcoin today.


That was actually Danny Hamilton's idea - but whatever (you clearly don't read very carefully do you).

Enjoy wasting all of our time to earn your ad sig posts (we all can see what kind of a person you really are).

Yes, but my understanding of it is limited, thats why I "degraded" myself and asked for a simpler explanation. Since you wrote it I assumed that you would understand your technology good enough to explain it to kids. From what I understand its something that could possibly be done with any or most crypto currencies which would enable it to be programmable in a way that is currently not possible with scripts.


It is not part of bitcoin and thus it does not belong in the bitcoin section.


I dont know what you are talking about. If you can link me to the thread I might remember whether I have reported it or not. I tend to report "a dozen" or so posts daily and the mods have a tendency to agree with me. Not allways. I e.g. reported your "no signature people" here thread to be moved into meta, because it is mainly about how the board is with sold signatures. AFAIK it was not moved, but I did not follow it very long and you might have reached other topics by now.


No, this is nothing personal I just like things to be sorted in the correct section. This is not allways easy or possible and I might very well have a missunderstand of your technology.


I would appreciate it if you did not result to insults.


Maybe you should just ignore all of us, wasnt that your plan in order to "slow down" the board and thus make theymos change the policy?

Oh and look - he has an "ad sig" - what a surprise!

(a guy who has no shame to sell his posts to the highest bidder)

Maybe I'll just report your crap posts to the ad sig campaign owner (but who knows they are probably as morally bankrupt as yourself).

Also - you admit you are unable to differentiate between an "alt coin" and a "technology"?

(dumb - and proud of it?)

Well I hope that you are happy with your result - it won't stop the development of the project nor the failure of your own agenda!

So thanks for showing up - and have you read this: http://ciyam.org/at/at_script.html

(I am not going to degrade myself to talking to you like a 5yo as I assume you are not a child)

After you have read that can you please defend your position?

BTW - have you reported TierNolan for ACCT being altcoin also (as that is not possible on Bitcoin either)?

My guess is that you have an agenda against either my projects or myself (perhaps you are a Nxt fan?).

As the person that keeps reporting your AT posts to be moved into the alt section please explain to me like I am 5 years old why your technology is bitcoin and not something "bitcoin 2.0". As you say yourself it is not even implemented for use with bitcoin, while other "bitcoin 2.0" technologies are and they still belong in the alt section.

Check the OP of the topic and then tell me why the mods would think it is "alt related".

(the bit with *** telling the mods is not entirely obvious?)

How can you be sure? A lot of mods are inactive or away for large parts of the weekend. I'm sure it was just a mistake. It can happen from time to time though I can see why someone might have thought it was alt-related.

Am sure they have seen this topic.

I don't know someone would do it. It maybe was their mistake. Try to PM grue, Maged, Raul Duke, SaltySpitoon, Stefan Thomas and BadBear.

   -MZ

I'd at least hope that the mod who moved it would actually "show their face" and explain themselves - sheesh.

@gmaxwell should know what AT is about as I have sent him a PM about it before, so as I stated if it was him then that is very disappointing (and I am not going to send another PM to him).

Try to PM gmaxwell about this issue and ask whether he did it and if yes, tell him to avoid this in future. But I think it was done by a Global Moderators. It would be good if you PM Global Moderators and Admins - most of them check Meta though.

   -MZ

If it was @gmaxwell then that is rather disappointing indeed.

Perhaps he should take a look at my PMs to see that even Gavin has asked me about AT (I don't think Gavin tends to send PMs to forum members about their alt coins).

The board he posted is Development & Technical Discussion and moderator of the board is gmaxwell.



   -MZ

Try PMing the global mods or the board from where your thread was moved mods and explain the situation.

Mods - please stop moving topics about AT (Automated Transactions) into the alts section.

AT is not an alt nor has it been designed to only work with alts (even if it is only currently implemented in an alt so far) - it is a technology which can be implemented in any blockchain platform (even Bitcoin if they ever decided to do that).

Perhaps whoever is moving my topics could take the time to read this: http://ciyam.org/at/at_script.html