Pages:
Author

Topic: At just $1, QUARK will be #3 on the planet - page 6. (Read 10607 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1005
PGP ID: 78B7B84D
December 04, 2013, 05:22:26 AM
#56
I had 35,000 QRK a month ago and sold them for 0.02BTC....They're worth like 6BTC right now.

Sigh I've made so many stupid trades

right there with you. I sold 60kQRK. I could have had 18 BTC at peak ._. more than double of what I've ever had
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
December 04, 2013, 04:33:33 AM
#55
IDK why it matters what the domain is..

As far as I know Quark is a 100% open source and free licensed.

legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
December 04, 2013, 04:29:41 AM
#54
You can say what you like, but they are going to pump QRK today.
Don't want it to be a pump & dump coin, but hey, buy it when it's cheap (and it is very cheap atm).
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
December 04, 2013, 02:09:32 AM
#53
I had 35,000 QRK a month ago and sold them for 0.02BTC....They're worth like 6BTC right now.

Sigh I've made so many stupid trades

I had over 86,000 QRK and I sold mine in October, I also had 7,500 MEC and so on. Oh well, there will be more opportunity down the crypto highway. 
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1000
Truly decentralized stable asset
December 04, 2013, 01:51:57 AM
#52
Of course Quark was pre-mined; there are 245 million of them!  LOL.  Who are the people falling for this ridiculous scamcoin?  Go down the list on coinmarketcap.com and pay attention to the number of coins available for each one.  Quark has 245 million?  REALLY?  What a massive fail.
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 500
In CryptoEnergy we trust
December 04, 2013, 01:25:44 AM
#51

Pretty much.  I had a couple million that I got rid of after that first jump to .00002 and don't regret it at all... why?  Because ultimately, well, Quark belongs at the .000000050 or whatever it was at prior to that jump.

& also people are still ignoring the *real* problem with Quark, and that is that one pool controls well over half the hashrate, probably 80% or more.  I sure wouldn't like to be holding millions of Quark when one person can decide my fate

Is there any possible fix to that *real* problem?
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
December 04, 2013, 01:24:19 AM
#50
I had 35,000 QRK a month ago and sold them for 0.02BTC....They're worth like 6BTC right now.

Sigh I've made so many stupid trades
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
December 04, 2013, 01:07:36 AM
#49
It is massive, kind of.
250million is actually nothing, the US government prints that much in QE in just over 2 hours!
If Quark is to take off in any way, then $1 is nothing.  At the moment it seems a lot, but with China pumping in money everwhere, it actually isn't much at all.

Don't forget, litecoin doesn't need to stay at it's market cap either, we are 50% of what litecoin was 2 weeks ago, but actually we are only 6% the size of litecoin... the goal posts are moving!  We could be $5 a quark and still the number 5 coin in a few months...  

EDIT and in reply to the aptly named noob, Quark wasn't premined at all.

The amount of U.S. dollars being printed is only a small tiny fraction compared to the total amount of money supply. That value was built up over many decades.

On the contrary, quark has risen in 6 months with 98% mined. A fascinating story, but has many caveats on whether value can be retained or whether the price will approach zero due to large number of coins that could be sold at any moment when buying support disappears. It might not happen for a month, but when it does, it will tank faster than any of the other currencies.

Pretty much.  I had a couple million that I got rid of after that first jump to .00002 and don't regret it at all... why?  Because ultimately, well, Quark belongs at the .000000050 or whatever it was at prior to that jump.

& also people are still ignoring the *real* problem with Quark, and that is that one pool controls well over half the hashrate, probably 80% or more.  I sure wouldn't like to be holding millions of Quark when one person can decide my fate
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
December 04, 2013, 01:03:48 AM
#48
It is massive, kind of.
250million is actually nothing, the US government prints that much in QE in just over 2 hours!
If Quark is to take off in any way, then $1 is nothing.  At the moment it seems a lot, but with China pumping in money everwhere, it actually isn't much at all.

Don't forget, litecoin doesn't need to stay at it's market cap either, we are 50% of what litecoin was 2 weeks ago, but actually we are only 6% the size of litecoin... the goal posts are moving!  We could be $5 a quark and still the number 5 coin in a few months...  

EDIT and in reply to the aptly named noob, Quark wasn't premined at all.

The amount of U.S. dollars being printed is only a small tiny fraction compared to the total amount of money supply. That value was built up over many decades.

On the contrary, quark has risen in 6 months with 98% mined. A fascinating story, but has many caveats on whether value can be retained or whether the price will approach zero due to large number of coins that could be sold at any moment when buying support disappears. It might not happen for a month, but when it does, it will tank faster than any of the other currencies.

When those speculating don't see returns due to older holders selling more and more coins into the market. Finally the speculators will sell and this will reveal the true value.

Well at least I'm hoping it won't collapse within a month, otherwise I would have sold or be in the processing of selling now. ^_^
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
December 04, 2013, 01:01:44 AM
#47
the majority of coins are premined

quark sucks
Quark wasn't pre-mined,  which makes your second statement a bit bizarre.. maybe explain the reasons as to why?

Quarkcoin wasn't pre-mined, but 98% of the coins were mined prior being released.
What are you talking about?

If 98% of the coins were mined prior to being released, then it was pre-mined... this is not the case.

Quarkcoins were announced on this forum and when I started mining it was around block #500.

Quote
so, is QRK still solo minable, or not..?

yeah, if you like 16 quark block rewards and being orphaned all the time

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1s0qdj/premining_means_the_coin_was_mined_before_public/

Why should I read that?  I already know that Quark wasn't premined.  98% of the coins also weren't mined prior to being released (because it wasn't premined).  Whatever is said on reddit is irrelevant
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
December 04, 2013, 01:00:07 AM
#46
the majority of coins are premined

quark sucks
Quark wasn't pre-mined,  which makes your second statement a bit bizarre.. maybe explain the reasons as to why?

Quarkcoin wasn't pre-mined, but 98% of the coins were mined prior being released.
What are you talking about?

If 98% of the coins were mined prior to being released, then it was pre-mined... this is not the case.

Quarkcoins were announced on this forum and when I started mining it was around block #500.

Quote
so, is QRK still solo minable, or not..?

yeah, if you like 16 quark block rewards and being orphaned all the time

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1s0qdj/premining_means_the_coin_was_mined_before_public/
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
December 04, 2013, 12:53:06 AM
#45
the majority of coins are premined

quark sucks
Quark wasn't pre-mined,  which makes your second statement a bit bizarre.. maybe explain the reasons as to why?

Quarkcoin wasn't pre-mined, but 98% of the coins were mined prior being released.
What are you talking about?

If 98% of the coins were mined prior to being released, then it was pre-mined... this is not the case.

Quarkcoins were announced on this forum and when I started mining it was around block #500.

Quote
so, is QRK still solo minable, or not..?

yeah, if you like 16 quark block rewards and being orphaned all the time
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 04, 2013, 12:30:21 AM
#44
thank god I bought in, time to sit and wait Tongue
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
December 04, 2013, 12:29:23 AM
#43
the majority of coins are premined

quark sucks
Quark wasn't pre-mined,  which makes your second statement a bit bizarre.. maybe explain the reasons as to why?

Quarkcoin wasn't pre-mined, but 98% of the coins were mined prior being released.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
December 04, 2013, 12:25:50 AM
#42
so, is QRK still solo minable, or not..?
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
December 04, 2013, 12:19:31 AM
#41
the majority of coins are premined

quark sucks
Quark wasn't pre-mined,  which makes your second statement a bit bizarre.. maybe explain the reasons as to why?
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
December 04, 2013, 12:17:33 AM
#40
If Quark just hits $1 per coin, it'll be the 3rd Largest Coin on the planet. Everyone will want a piece of this coin, This is truly the crypto for the "masses".

Great security and potential for "mass" usage.


Get in while it's cheap  Smiley

Quark seems really attractive now. Fast, very secure, usable for trade usage.

btw I'm promoting and working with Datacoin, but it is not just for money transactions - dtc has another purpose. Just to be decent, for 'pure trade' I'd like to use Quarks.

The coin isn't secure as long as over 3/4ths of the hashing power is being directed at one entity... sorry, but that's just how it is.  

For the exact same reason that this isn't good for Bitcoins

hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 500
In CryptoEnergy we trust
December 04, 2013, 12:17:25 AM
#39
Quote
..., Quark is the currency of and for the people .

If Quark is the currency of and for the people, can you answer my previous questions?
As you (digitalindustry) seem to be some kind of "insider", maybe you can help me (and many others) clarify those doubts.

Thank you for your help on this.
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
December 03, 2013, 11:57:27 PM
#38
There is still an elite of top 10 Quark owners that could manipulate the market, and it only takes someone comming up with an even faster and more secure cryptocurrency to surpass this currency. I hope im wrong because i've already invested.

Zerocoin, assuming it ever comes out.  Tongue
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
December 03, 2013, 11:56:27 PM
#37
Just a few unanswered questions (pasted from their official forum):

Who's the founder?  Is he/she known and still active on the project?

Is there a list of developers that are currently working on QRK?
Are new developers allowed join the team?

Why do they set the default official website under .com domain?  (Just try, enter quarkcoin.org and you will see it redirected to .com)
Is it a community organization/development or a commercial .com business?

Note: I do have some quarks, I like how fast it is, in a practical sense it works very well.
I just see that there are some fundamental questions that remain unanswered by the supposed developers...

Can someone help to clarify whose doubts?
I think that more info and transparency will be needed for people to trust it (and then see a price increase).


bunch of noobs riding on bitcoin success that implemented a half-backed idea like 90% of coins. Still more trustable than federal reserve.

Poor little franky : ( 
Pages:
Jump to: