Topic: At least 1 in every 5 ICOs is a scam! How to avoid the fraud? - page 2. (Read 289 times)
Yeah there are many project that scammed, usually you need to do your research by reading the whitepaper, check the team developers, join their social media, if they are legit, you will see how they promote the coin and where they promote the coin, there will be bunch of photos where they go to promote and no need to rush to invest, find more information about the project, check their website, if something is odd don't join the project
Yeah their a good and bad of it! It affects the whole crypto market instead newbies or new investors will really rely on other projects they look the project as a scam, they should be aware on the project they are into it! Might as well read whitepaper and search it on google.
This is very apt. But most Icos today are more are suffering because of lack of knowledge and impatience on the part of the investors. They fail to understand that putting money in an ico should not be seen as a get rich quick scheme. So when they invest today they expect to gain x10 profits as soon as the tokens are listed on exchanges. It doesn't work out like this most of the time and that is why most feel icos are scams
If this is true, it will be an alarming stats. I think the figures are too high and it can make investors think twice or doubt before investing. As a result, the number of investors will go down because of the stat. I think word needs to be rephrase like "higher risk" or "unsuccessful". They need to differentiate it first before coming up with a conclusion that its a scam.
This is a technology world so some one is trying to cheat the Crypto platform so we only protect our self. Because we have some technical skills in Crypto platform so research and analyse the more trusted platform then participate that ICO. But Five out of one is successfully survive in Crypto world so we should choose best one then only it will useful to our future journey.
That stat is scary,i think ICOs should be regulated by Government,at least to some level.It will reduce the chances of scammy ICOs
Well kickstarter also suffer the same fate, many of them turns out to be a scam so when it comes to ICO, which not strictly as IPO some of them will turn out to be scam, is a normal thing. You can find how much kickstarter that finally turns out to be a scam even though the funding was hosted by centralized organization and that's just doesnt make sense at all different with cryptocurrency thats totally decentralized.
At least 1 in every 5 ICOs is a scam! How to avoid the fraud?
>>>Recently The Wall Street Journal has made a research with anxious results. Experts have checked 1450 different ICO project to make a conclusion that 271 of them have all the signs of scam. So, ICOs remain very risky type of investments.
>>>The method that WSJ utilized for analyzing these ICOs was focused on finding duplicate whitepapers, weird promises like complete return guarantees, or listing fake executive staff who are not related to cryptocurrency or have no relation with ICO that has listed them as a team member. The study has also found that many ICO team pages featured pictures from stock photos. The most striking example is perhaps Premium Trade, whose five-member executive team purportedly appeared on 500 other unrelated websites, according to a Google reverse image search performed by WSJ.
>>>For one, you should double-check all claims made by the company before trusting the marketing content blindly. It also helps to run extensive background checks on their team members to make sure their credentials are indeed legitimate.
>>>It is also always a good idea to read the white paper, and see if it defines a clear product idea, including the technical details (remember to check for plagiarism).
>>>And if you spot any overtly bullish claims like “registration with the SEC,” lavish “celebrity endorsements,” or “a billion dollar solution” – you should avoid such investment “opportunities”
Good information to increase knowledge and be more careful in making investment decisions. Based on what you reveal, at least we can be more vigilant and check everything related to the project we like in detail before starting the investment. >>>Recently The Wall Street Journal has made a research with anxious results. Experts have checked 1450 different ICO project to make a conclusion that 271 of them have all the signs of scam. So, ICOs remain very risky type of investments.
>>>The method that WSJ utilized for analyzing these ICOs was focused on finding duplicate whitepapers, weird promises like complete return guarantees, or listing fake executive staff who are not related to cryptocurrency or have no relation with ICO that has listed them as a team member. The study has also found that many ICO team pages featured pictures from stock photos. The most striking example is perhaps Premium Trade, whose five-member executive team purportedly appeared on 500 other unrelated websites, according to a Google reverse image search performed by WSJ.
>>>For one, you should double-check all claims made by the company before trusting the marketing content blindly. It also helps to run extensive background checks on their team members to make sure their credentials are indeed legitimate.
>>>It is also always a good idea to read the white paper, and see if it defines a clear product idea, including the technical details (remember to check for plagiarism).
>>>And if you spot any overtly bullish claims like “registration with the SEC,” lavish “celebrity endorsements,” or “a billion dollar solution” – you should avoid such investment “opportunities”
you are posted good points and its help for which thinking investment about ICOs, if i have S merit surely give to this post because it have good points for avoid the fraud
Oh, great to see that there is only one of five. I consider it to be a good index, don't you?
That stat is scary,i think ICOs should be regulated by Government,at least to some level.It will reduce the chances of scammy ICOs
The SEC has taking an action for those scammy ICOshttps://www.coindesk.com/the-sec-is-again-freezing-the-assets-of-a-plexcoin-founder/
Yes that is our best way to analyze the future of the ICO project. Very many aspects or factors that we must review and of course it all takes experience.
However, we can make sure at the beginning whether the project is a SCAM or not we only predict it, for the certainty is when the project is running and ending.
However, we can make sure at the beginning whether the project is a SCAM or not we only predict it, for the certainty is when the project is running and ending.
That stat is scary,i think ICOs should be regulated by Government,at least to some level.It will reduce the chances of scammy ICOs
The SEC has taking an action for those scammy ICOshttps://www.coindesk.com/the-sec-is-again-freezing-the-assets-of-a-plexcoin-founder/
That stat is scary,i think ICOs should be regulated by Government,at least to some level.It will reduce the chances of scammy ICOs
That's why governments are now evaluating these ICOs to make sure that shady ICOs will removed and banned. So they won't be able to scam investors. There are so many scam ICOs out there. So every ICO must comply to every regulations that government needs them to do. For me, this is not a bad thing in my opinion. Many gullible investors are being scammed everyday. Atleast we see the government is doing something to protect us.
Quote
I think ICO's can never be regulated by the governments. These governments are the people stabbing us at our back so how can they regulate ICO's for us?
How they regulate these ICOs? That's very easy on their part. They just evaluate those ICOs. Of course quality ICOs can only pass. And when an ICO passed, then government will set a regulations which the ICO must comply. At this terms, they won't be allow to do any shady business and eventually scam their investors. Actually some countries are doing it now.
That stat is scary,i think ICOs should be regulated by Government,at least to some level.It will reduce the chances of scammy ICOs
I think ICO's can never be regulated by the governments. These governments are the people stabbing us at our back so how can they regulate ICO's for us?
I'm not a professional investors in ICO project but as I know to know which one is a good ICO project, people often check dev team member, WP, social media, Roadmap,...Beside I think you can avoid scam project by joining some groups about ICO project on Facebook or Telegram, I don't know if it'll work for you or not but for me, it's really good 
That stat is scary,i think ICOs should be regulated by Government,at least to some level.It will reduce the chances of scammy ICOs
This is really informative and educative. Thanks so much for letting us know this. From hence I think we will be vigilant on the choice of ICO's we choose to invest in.
At least 1 in every 5 ICOs is a scam! How to avoid the fraud?
>>>Recently The Wall Street Journal has made a research with anxious results. Experts have checked 1450 different ICO project to make a conclusion that 271 of them have all the signs of scam. So, ICOs remain very risky type of investments.
>>>The method that WSJ utilized for analyzing these ICOs was focused on finding duplicate whitepapers, weird promises like complete return guarantees, or listing fake executive staff who are not related to cryptocurrency or have no relation with ICO that has listed them as a team member. The study has also found that many ICO team pages featured pictures from stock photos. The most striking example is perhaps Premium Trade, whose five-member executive team purportedly appeared on 500 other unrelated websites, according to a Google reverse image search performed by WSJ.
>>>For one, you should double-check all claims made by the company before trusting the marketing content blindly. It also helps to run extensive background checks on their team members to make sure their credentials are indeed legitimate.
>>>It is also always a good idea to read the white paper, and see if it defines a clear product idea, including the technical details (remember to check for plagiarism).
>>>And if you spot any overtly bullish claims like “registration with the SEC,” lavish “celebrity endorsements,” or “a billion dollar solution” – you should avoid such investment “opportunities”
<<<<<< This is helpful for all and be careful your investment >>>>>
<<<<<>>>>>>
>>>Recently The Wall Street Journal has made a research with anxious results. Experts have checked 1450 different ICO project to make a conclusion that 271 of them have all the signs of scam. So, ICOs remain very risky type of investments.
>>>The method that WSJ utilized for analyzing these ICOs was focused on finding duplicate whitepapers, weird promises like complete return guarantees, or listing fake executive staff who are not related to cryptocurrency or have no relation with ICO that has listed them as a team member. The study has also found that many ICO team pages featured pictures from stock photos. The most striking example is perhaps Premium Trade, whose five-member executive team purportedly appeared on 500 other unrelated websites, according to a Google reverse image search performed by WSJ.
>>>For one, you should double-check all claims made by the company before trusting the marketing content blindly. It also helps to run extensive background checks on their team members to make sure their credentials are indeed legitimate.
>>>It is also always a good idea to read the white paper, and see if it defines a clear product idea, including the technical details (remember to check for plagiarism).
>>>And if you spot any overtly bullish claims like “registration with the SEC,” lavish “celebrity endorsements,” or “a billion dollar solution” – you should avoid such investment “opportunities”
<<<<<< This is helpful for all and be careful your investment >>>>>
<<<<<
Jump to: