Looking at the odds, it looks like Rojas, Ibarguen, and Ricketts are the three huge favorites.
are really they ? but why thier odds are only smaller based on the pic that you qouted while others have a bigger number of odds ? afaik high odds means high chance of winning right ?
Hello, shoreno! It means that what you have known all this time is probably wrong. If you are betting, you've probably noticed it this time. The lowest odds goes to the most favorite while the highest odds goes to the most underdog.
For example, if you place a bet to Rojas, your $100 will return to you x 1.35 (the odds), that would be $135. Meaning you only won $35 in your $100 bet. On the other hand, if you place a bet to Petrova, your $100 will return to you x 139.50 (the odds), that would be $13,950. Meaning your $100 gives you a $13,850 prize.
The interpretation would be that Rojas is more likely to win over Petrova. Hence, the lower winning prize. Rojas is obviously the favorite here and Petrova the underdog.
If your interpretation is correct, I'm afraid betting sites would declare bankruptcy in a couple of days.