He could be but if he makes a valid case,it doesn't matter.
Still waiting to see any evidence of a "valid" case... The "case" so far consists of a forum thread from 2 years ago... from a completely different forum... where the OP has a completely different username.
The ONLY link between the OP of said thread and aTriz and Decoded is that they are all from Sydney, Australia. A city of 5+ million people.
The
butthurt troll "Accuser" contends that he "worked" for these guys, supposedly posting 100 posts per day for 14 different accounts (1400 posts/day!!?!
)... for over 2 years. Nevermind that the original thread offer was for 15 weeks. He also contends that they communicated via email and that they paid him... in which case, given his talent for posting, he should be able to provide documentary evidence by way of emails.
Given how long he has had to provide some actual evidence, and just repeatedly spammed the same forum thread link, while locking/unlocking a scam thread, creating a new account, posting in the scam thread with obvious alt account... the logical explanation is that he has no evidence.
And until some "valid" proof is presented... there is no "valid" case and he will remain an obvious butthurt troll