I really dont understand all the hate for Atriz ? what has he done?
chucked you out of a campaign? not allowed you in one? touched your bottom?? come on tell us whats the real reason for all this shit?
Topic: aTriz farming trust - page 2. (Read 1399 times)
Here you can see a judge from btalk:
What comes next?
Ban to my acc?
This guys will fuck the forum! Stay tunned moderators!
What comes next?
Ban to my acc?
This guys will fuck the forum! Stay tunned moderators!
Descentralisation = unknow judge?
Where are the trust feedback to the any user who made a succesfull transactions?
All posts made about some guys have a fast answer from lawyers or hited guy, SOOOO FAST!
Why after all reports, some guys keep with your power, and dont give any feedback positive to random users in YEARS?
OK, Lauda advise me about keep my red trust cause i want proof! Youre right!
IM fucking about your time! i just want a proof! Youre have many thread blaming you, not me, about the same way! Youre not a good people, and this will showed to everyone one day!
Where are the trust feedback to the any user who made a succesfull transactions?
All posts made about some guys have a fast answer from lawyers or hited guy, SOOOO FAST!
Why after all reports, some guys keep with your power, and dont give any feedback positive to random users in YEARS?
OK, Lauda advise me about keep my red trust cause i want proof! Youre right!
IM fucking about your time! i just want a proof! Youre have many thread blaming you, not me, about the same way! Youre not a good people, and this will showed to everyone one day!
Not going to talk about the reference Lauda linked to your trust feedback because I'm not particularly informed on the whole jamalaezaz shenanigan.
Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No.
If you read the feedback comments they're usually abstract if there isn't a reference.
Imagine: how would you link a reference if your comment was: 'Leibniz has time and time again proved that they have the sharpest wit'?
Many of members who have judge power here work together!
You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!
These are just empty insults. I don't see the point.You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!
You give me red-trust using your power, but look at your trust! Just 1 postitive feedback have reference link, and a negative feedback has covered, WTF!
Yeah, because sometimes a reference is not required for feedback. When it covers a variety of different topics and can be found consistently, is there really a point to link any specific page/thread? Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No.
Click in the users who have give positive feedbacks and check they feedbacks! Same guys with without reference! OHHHHHH just a little deal, ok, your keyboard dont have printscreen?
Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!
Similar to the above.Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!
If you read the feedback comments they're usually abstract if there isn't a reference.
Imagine: how would you link a reference if your comment was: 'Leibniz has time and time again proved that they have the sharpest wit'?
Well, wheres the proof about me?
Maybe in my deleted post!
"Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No."
Ok, when u feedback someone about shitpost, you cant write a feed back with reference and some links in text like they do many times?
Im still waiting ... to answer my red trust!
If you keep attacking me, you are surely going to get a charitable contribution of my time.I guess my time has come and gone. I pass the hat.
I've become more famous than you! 
OK, or i accept my red trust without any proof, or i cant claim any proof, cause u will keep this!
Very fair!
Thanks!
Not going to talk about the reference Lauda linked to your trust feedback because I'm not particularly informed on the whole jamalaezaz shenanigan.
Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No.
If you read the feedback comments they're usually abstract if there isn't a reference.
Imagine: how would you link a reference if your comment was: 'Leibniz has time and time again proved that they have the sharpest wit'?
Many of members who have judge power here work together!
You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!
These are just empty insults. I don't see the point.You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!
You give me red-trust using your power, but look at your trust! Just 1 postitive feedback have reference link, and a negative feedback has covered, WTF!
Yeah, because sometimes a reference is not required for feedback. When it covers a variety of different topics and can be found consistently, is there really a point to link any specific page/thread? Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No.
Click in the users who have give positive feedbacks and check they feedbacks! Same guys with without reference! OHHHHHH just a little deal, ok, your keyboard dont have printscreen?
Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!
Similar to the above.Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!
If you read the feedback comments they're usually abstract if there isn't a reference.
Imagine: how would you link a reference if your comment was: 'Leibniz has time and time again proved that they have the sharpest wit'?
Im still waiting ... to answer my red trust!
If you keep attacking me, you are surely going to get a charitable contribution of my time.I guess my time has come and gone. I pass the hat.
I've become more famous than you! 
Write "Lauda bitcointalk" in google please! =D
Damn... Lauda has finally passed me - 34k results vs my 28k results.
I guess my time has come and gone. I pass the hat.
Lauda create a Escrow thread self moderated.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ror-1913580
And take 2 positives feedbacks in this time in your trust, without any reference!
Write "Lauda bitcointalk" in google please! =D
HOW PEOPLE WHO DONT SHOW YOURSELF CAN HAVE SOME TRUST HERE!
This is like here in Brazil, the fucking dirt just down in some back's when the others take the place!
Im still waiting some proof about me to answer my red trust!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ror-1913580
And take 2 positives feedbacks in this time in your trust, without any reference!
Write "Lauda bitcointalk" in google please! =D
HOW PEOPLE WHO DONT SHOW YOURSELF CAN HAVE SOME TRUST HERE!
This is like here in Brazil, the fucking dirt just down in some back's when the others take the place!
Im still waiting some proof about me to answer my red trust!
Many of members who have judge power here work together!
You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!
You give me red-trust using your power, but look at your trust! Just 1 postitive feedback have reference link, and a negative feedback has covered, WTF!
--------
Click in the users who have give positive feedbacks and check they feedbacks! Same guys with without reference! OHHHHHH just a little deal, ok, your keyboard dont have printscreen?
Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!
I waiting you to show me your proof about my red trust!
You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!
It's always the noob alt accounts who sling this particular brand of feces. Now, if there was some merit to the claim this dude was making then it'd be irrelevant what rank the dude is--but there is no merit to this accusation. Atriz is a campaign manager, and it's normal for participants to leave positives.
It's pretty much the classic narrative. Hell, I left him one because he did an outstanding job on the campaign I was in, and furthermore it shows he can be trusted with money (I don't think there was an escrow, but I could be wrong). This is just another idiotic thread started by some rectally-lesioned, agonized retard who got denied from or booted out of one of aTriz's campaigns.
He can. He doesn't stand to gain anything from this anyways given that he insists that I escrow where possible (via ALU or otherwise).The email forwarding contract positive trust is probably the only one that is even anywhere close to it. As the trust system is unmoderated though, it is completely up to the discretion of TBZ to give out that trust.
There's always the question of intent. If he bought that contract because he needed it in addition to knowing he'd receive trust for it, is it trust farming? I could even see genuine cases where the contract ends up being unused without malicious intent. Either way, I've suggested TBZ to have a higher criteria when leaving positive trust ratings.You give me red-trust using your power, but look at your trust! Just 1 postitive feedback have reference link, and a negative feedback has covered, WTF!
--------
Click in the users who have give positive feedbacks and check they feedbacks! Same guys with without reference! OHHHHHH just a little deal, ok, your keyboard dont have printscreen?
Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!
I waiting you to show me your proof about my red trust!
aTriz is legit..go away
look at his trust ratings https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/atriz-135920
Some of the post sound confusing. Is this intended to damage the trust or reputation of aTriz. I think it is more of a promotion.I checked on the profile of originator of the post
. Here is what I see: Account created May 29, 2017, 10:38:00 PM. Activity 1. Post 1.
My wonder then; Was the account created and the first post is this, since may? Can some one help me explain.
aTriz is a good man with confidence in work , I never saw or heard him utilising his trust to stand on other, Infact he has helped me once and gave a some money on telegram only without thinking and that is the trust not the figures you see.
I am sure atriz is building rep to be a successful manager and he needs it, there is no harm in this, if lauda has so much trust that is why we use him for escrow nothing wrong in this.
My trust is for atriz.
, I never saw or heard him utilising his trust to stand on other, Infact he has helped me once and gave a some money on telegram only without thinking and that is the trust not the figures you see.I am sure atriz is building rep to be a successful manager and he needs it, there is no harm in this, if lauda has so much trust that is why we use him for escrow nothing wrong in this.
My trust is for atriz.
It's always the noob alt accounts who sling this particular brand of feces. Now, if there was some merit to the claim this dude was making then it'd be irrelevant what rank the dude is--but there is no merit to this accusation. Atriz is a campaign manager, and it's normal for participants to leave positives.
It's pretty much the classic narrative. Hell, I left him one because he did an outstanding job on the campaign I was in, and furthermore it shows he can be trusted with money (I don't think there was an escrow, but I could be wrong). This is just another idiotic thread started by some rectally-lesioned, agonized retard who got denied from or booted out of one of aTriz's campaigns.
He can. He doesn't stand to gain anything from this anyways given that he insists that I escrow where possible (via ALU or otherwise).The email forwarding contract positive trust is probably the only one that is even anywhere close to it. As the trust system is unmoderated though, it is completely up to the discretion of TBZ to give out that trust.
There's always the question of intent. If he bought that contract because he needed it in addition to knowing he'd receive trust for it, is it trust farming? I could even see genuine cases where the contract ends up being unused without malicious intent. Either way, I've suggested TBZ to have a higher criteria when leaving positive trust ratings. look at his trust ratings https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/atriz-135920
Don't get it, where is he farming trust?
The email forwarding contract positive trust is probably the only one that is even anywhere close to it. As the trust system is unmoderated though, it is completely up to the discretion of TBZ to give out that trust.
All the rest as far as i can tell are all legit trades with references, and the amounts involved aren't small either.
It's always the noob alt accounts who sling this particular brand of feces. Now, if there was some merit to the claim this dude was making then it'd be irrelevant what rank the dude is--but there is no merit to this accusation. Atriz is a campaign manager, and it's normal for participants to leave positives.
Hell, I left him one because he did an outstanding job on the campaign I was in, and furthermore it shows he can be trusted with money (I don't think there was an escrow, but I could be wrong). This is just another idiotic thread started by some rectally-lesioned, agonized retard who got denied from or booted out of one of aTriz's campaigns.
Hell, I left him one because he did an outstanding job on the campaign I was in, and furthermore it shows he can be trusted with money (I don't think there was an escrow, but I could be wrong). This is just another idiotic thread started by some rectally-lesioned, agonized retard who got denied from or booted out of one of aTriz's campaigns.
look at his trust ratings https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/atriz-135920
Oh God not another thread! So you are trying to say that campaign managers can't participate in forum trades? If they trade here does that mean that the user is farming trust? Move on from these baseless accusations unless you have solid proof against them.
Who are you referring to here? Who sold you these accounts? Can you provide some proof?
This guy is trash talking me and making false accusations because I revealed his trust abuse attempt. (which is linked to a legendary account used as the "dev" of a token.)
I have sold maybe 2 or 3 accounts in the past. I was taking them as collateral for loans. (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/loan-yoggs-micro-small-loans-no-collateral-for-microloan-up-to-010-btc-977216)
They were put to sale when the lender defaulted.
I was naive enough to believe they were used to enroll in Signature campaign, and haven't imagined that scammers would want them to perpetuate their thefts.
When I became aware of that, I immediately stopped considering them as valid collateral.
Anyway, we might not have the same definition of "numerous" ..
There is another eventuality, if "3" is numerous for that guy, then I'll blow his mind by telling him that after 3 there is 4, then 5 and 6 .. Which is twice as enormous as 3.
Atriz has been a manager of numerous campaigns so I can't see any reason for him to earn trust.
You sold numerous accounts to me and all the accounts that can be traced back to you.
They all have negative trust and you contributed too it dickhead scum.
suffer now
Who are you referring to here? Who sold you these accounts? Can you provide some proof?
Jump to: