It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
| | #2
June 07, 2016, 07:06:14 PM
#8 - 0.57
June 07, 2016, 03:14:52 AM
#2 @ 0.9
June 06, 2016, 08:48:31 PM
#2 @ 0.8
June 06, 2016, 07:49:50 PM
some have asked about unfunded versions of these coins and this is my response:
On the topic of unfunded coins, after much thought I've decided to require all buyers of the 3-coin silver monero sets to fund them with their face value: 25, 50, and 100 monero. There will be no unfunded Lealana physical silver monero coins. June 06, 2016, 05:16:17 PM
if the 0.35 btc people drop out I can offer 0.25 btc for any set. To be honest, I wouldn't even worry about it... we still have 9 days to go and it's still picking up steam. These are going to get pricey I think. Right you were. Already priced out of these beauties. June 06, 2016, 11:52:29 AM
#4 1.00 BTC
#10 1.00 BTC June 06, 2016, 04:34:27 AM
#2 @ 0.7
June 06, 2016, 04:29:46 AM
#6 @ 0.45
#8 @ 0.45 #10 @ 0.45 June 06, 2016, 03:50:23 AM
#2 @ 0.6
June 06, 2016, 02:56:40 AM
reposting this here...
I noticed a typo in the payment terms of this auction. Not that I think anyone who bids will not pay their bid. But just in case in reference to the following text in the OP: Quote Payment for winners of auctioned sets needs to be completed within 72 hours of the auction end. Should someone not pay for their bid, the set will go to the next highest bidder. Meaning all winners of sets with higher numbers than the person who failed to pay will get a set of set_number - 2 (i.e. if you won set 5 and the winner of set 3 fails to pay in time, next highest bidder who missed the cut off gets set 9, set 9 winner gets set 7, set 7 winner gets set 5, and set 5 winner gets set 3) Simply put: If the winner for a particular set # fails to pay for their bid within 72 hours after the auction end, then the set will go to the next highest bidder of that same numbered set. Everyone can just ignore the bolded text above as it makes little to no sense given the context of how the auction is running. My mistake. June 06, 2016, 12:13:02 AM
#2 @ 0.5
June 05, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
#2 @ 0.4
June 05, 2016, 09:04:13 PM
if the 0.35 btc people drop out I can offer 0.25 btc for any set. To be honest, I wouldn't even worry about it... we still have 9 days to go and it's still picking up steam. These are going to get pricey I think. June 05, 2016, 09:02:16 PM
if the 0.35 btc people drop out I can offer 0.25 btc for any set.
June 05, 2016, 08:53:27 PM
#8 @ .35
June 05, 2016, 08:15:46 PM
#4 @ .35
June 05, 2016, 07:49:02 PM
#2 @ 0.35 BTC
Jump to:
|