According to one or the articles last year it says
can be observed that between one and a half and two percent of all available Auroracoin Airdrop coins have likely been fraudulently acquired so far.
Can we get an actual tally on how many coins are supposedly fraudulent? Because I'd argue if it is really only 1-2% that is actually a pretty low amount, I'm sure the Dash, Monero and SDC devs hold a much greater percentage of their own coin than 1-2% for instance.
Even it the dev had questionable intentions, I think a community takeover can stomach 2% of coins being dumped on the market and that is much preferable to just starting from scratch. If Balduro gets his small cut, so be it, he still came up with the idea and 2% is not exactly an unfair amount for a dev to hold.
2%? More like 60%+
Take a good look at the blockchain.
I did, where is the 60%+ hidden?
In the adresses shown in this thread aswell as the adresses linked to it plus a whole lot of adresses that escaped attention. Exact blockchain forensics will take many hundred of hours to determine the exact amount of laundered premine.
This wallet is just one possible example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/aur/wallet.dws?15531.htmIt's also logical the ones who benefited and still benefit from the scam are now eager to whitewash it.
If i thought this was a scam i would walk away from this project.
You do realize you are pointing to an exchange wallet. What i have seen from you are random numbers you throw out and to me it looks more like fUD than facts. I am not saying you are wrong, just not very convincing argument. I do own aur and yes i will gain from it rising in value.
Like has been said: your attempts to whitewash the scam are obvious. That "exchange wallet" was claiming a heck lot of airdrops, didn't it?
Do you have evidence to prove your claim this would be an exchange wallet? No, you don't. You just throw it out there as a statement without any evidence. I'm not here to convince you,because you likely are not convincible as a bagholder that you are. All evidence is there out in the open for those willing to do their due dilligence. In case you are biased because you are bagholding it, that's ok too but just don't try to whitewash it with more lies in order to draw more people into that scam because that's criminal behaviour and actually a felony by law and can be severly punished. Unregulated markets don't mean fraud is permitted.
If you are knowingly advertising a fraudulent investement, you are commiting a crime.
I do not throw out statements, i investigated the block chain, backtracked my withdrawal from cryptsy and know this is their wallet. I am not trying to convince you either, if you have some facts it is a scam please present them. We will investigate and i will be the first to admit if you present something solid . If you don´t like people answering your just say so.
So go ahead and show us evidence you withdrew from that wallet. And prove it is a cryptsy wallet.
Even if that was the case it just would show parts of the laundered premine was directly sent to a cryptsy account, nothing more. So it really doesn't make a difference if this a wallet at cryptsy or not.
edit: i see the blockexploreer marks it as cryptsy. So we know now about a couple of adresses balduro and his scamming friends used at cryptsy. Good. The fact parts of the premine were laundered directly to a cryptsy account doesn't change a thing.
So far nobody has made any statements about the other evidence in this thread here, which beyond any doubt shows that huge amounts of premined coins were claimed by one and the same person (Balduro, who else?). Actually the vast majority of all premined coins.