Automatic Default Trust | Bitcointalksearch.org

SebastianJu

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 1083

Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 03:45:54 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things.

And it's even completely different from buying a hero account, shortly before legendary, leveling it up and being on default trust. I already see account some traders using their automatical default trust legendary accounts to kill the purpose of the trust system. It's like buying votes.

koshgel

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1001

Terrible idea as been mentioned. The whole idea of not being able to buy trust would go out the window.

GermanGiant

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 501

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

Having handpicked members at DT, while trust is unmoderated is a horrible idea. In case, if it has to be kept, this is the best idea => https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/replacing-defaulttrust-914641

subSTRATA

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1043

:^)

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 07:08:58 PM

more people on default trust= more people leave trust= less people complain about a specific person leaving them negative trust

i see it more as more people on DT = more people leaving neg trust = more complaints about people leaving neg trust.

tarsua

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

more people on default trust= more people leave trust= less people complain about a specific person leaving them negative trust

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: minifrij on August 08, 2015, 06:54:29 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 06:48:26 PM

Quote from: minifrij on August 08, 2015, 05:31:23 PM

Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?

If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller

People don't like being called out on their mistakes, Quickseller and the trust system is no exception to that.

People don't like being called out as scammers, especially in the middle of a scam attempt, especially when they think their scam attempt is about to be successful.

Blazed

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1119

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 06:48:26 PM

Quote from: minifrij on August 08, 2015, 05:31:23 PM

Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?

If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller

You see maybe 2-3 complaints...yet how many times do people leave feedback and not have issues? The trust system works fine here - no such thing as a perfect system for anything. No matter what someone always has to whine and complain about something.

minifrij

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1268

In Memory of Zepher

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 06:48:26 PM

Quote from: minifrij on August 08, 2015, 05:31:23 PM

Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?

If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller

People don't like being called out on their mistakes, Quickseller and the trust system is no exception to that.

Besides, by your plan he would be getting on DT soon enough anyway. So how would it help?

tarsua

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: minifrij on August 08, 2015, 05:31:23 PM

Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?

If the system worked fine, there wouldnt be 5 complaints a day about quickseller

White sugar

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1005

TD is legendary or is close to be.

Since scammers are not banned, being legendary does not means you should go to default trust

minifrij

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1268

In Memory of Zepher

Why should the forum pay people to screen for default trust when the system currently in place works fine?

tarsua

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 04:48:24 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 04:41:07 PM

Naturally the forum could hire some workers for this

high potential for bribery/corruption with that. also, that would require the forum to pay people; where would that money come from?

you cant bribe if you dont know who to bribe, the people who do this will be anonymous

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:50:44 PM

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 03:45:54 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things.

As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it

Then that's not automatic, but uses turning Legendary as an arbitrary promotion point. Makes account selling even more valuable, gauranteed default trust accounts etc. Legendary is rare though, even I haven't reached it yet and by the time I do it'll probably get moved again.

subSTRATA

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1043

:^)

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 04:41:07 PM

Naturally the forum could hire some workers for this

high potential for bribery/corruption with that. also, that would require the forum to pay people; where would that money come from?

EternalWingsofGod

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

No just no
It would set to many dependancies and a lot of problems including the fact that some might not have traded any goods/services cash with others among other cases.

tarsua

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 04:15:50 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:50:44 PM

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 03:45:54 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things.

As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it

even if they are screened, who would be the central figure in deciding who should be on DT? the admins don't have time for that, and its unfair to put that responsibility onto the people already on DT. the system as it is now isnt the best, but its fine.

Naturally the forum could hire some workers for this

Quote from: Zz on August 08, 2015, 04:22:38 PM

This is the worst idea I've ever read in this forum. Trust system is already manipulated. If they enable this it'll be a lot easier to abuse with sold Legendary accounts.

Quote from: Blazed on August 08, 2015, 04:16:59 PM

Really bad idea since so many accounts are sold + account age has nothing to do with being trustworthy.

As said, they will be watched, if they slip they slide, so there will be no sense buying accounts

Zz

legendary

Activity: 1820

Merit: 1077

This is the worst idea I've ever read in this forum. Trust system is already manipulated. If they enable this it'll be a lot easier to abuse with sold Legendary accounts.

Blazed

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1119

Really bad idea since so many accounts are sold + account age has nothing to do with being trustworthy.

subSTRATA

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1043

:^)

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:50:44 PM

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 03:45:54 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things.

As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it

even if they are screened, who would be the central figure in deciding who should be on DT? the admins don't have time for that, and its unfair to put that responsibility onto the people already on DT. the system as it is now isnt the best, but its fine.

tarsua

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: subSTRATA on August 08, 2015, 03:45:54 PM

Quote from: tarsua on August 08, 2015, 03:21:11 PM

Legendary members should get automatic default trust capabilites, after a member becomes legendary, their post history and trust ratings should be screened, if everything looks good, they should automatically added to default trust.

what do you guys think?

what the hell? no. hell no. being on here for 2/3 years and being trusted are two completely different things.

As said, before they are granted this, they will be screened, if they dont deserve it, they wont get it

Topic: Automatic Default Trust (Read 1072 times)