Only thing that really makes sense is for bitsyncom to license the Bitfury multi core chip and reference design at this point. 0.39W/gh is hard to beat (if tests are conclusive) and since they provenly can build and deliver PCB etc. and have the (still somewhat) reputable Avalon name, they could make a killing selling basically Bitfury clones.
Metabank say 0.7w per Ghs
https://metabank.ru/asic
Where has seen 0.39w/ghs?
Thanks
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2515472
This is absurd.
Produces a chip that can operate at 5Ghs, manufacturing a device with 24chips and 120GHs.
But for the device consumes less you get a device with 24Ghs.
It's like buy a Ferrari and driving without gaining 3000rpm, consume less. But it is a waste.
Do you hashrate highly stable? or lower power consumption?
You should know that to have a 120Ghs device. Have 0.39w/ghs performance requires a device with 120 chips. This product more expensive above $ 18 / Ghs to over $ 60 / Ghs that if you consume only 50W.
actually if they reduce the package size, the asic chips can hash more and use less power. Avalon has a 135nm package size and it does 280-400mh/s . I believe BFL has a 65nm package size and it does 5.9 GH/s per chip (I could be wrong). KNCminer is working on a 28nm ASIC which may very well do ~60 - 100 gigahash/second per chip.
135nm is the feature size, not the package size, doofus. You'd need a scanning electron microscope to find a 135nm chip.
(actually, their feature size is 110nm, but nevermind...)
110nm isn't the size of the chip is the size of transistor.
Erm, this isn't right either. The process node refers to the half pitch of a memory cell.
)
