Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 148. (Read 703547 times)

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi patric, I have started to use remote GPU rig (not local network) on windows10pro, but main AW window not show power usage for this rig and of course calculate wrong total profit.
If i go to GPU tab in AW for this rig, i see power usage for every GPU in this rig.
I have asics which is controled from the same AW instance in local network and power usage control/profit calculation works right.
In my config asics and gpu placed in different miner groups.
pls help....
Can you please go to the Options dialog, Profitability section, and make sure the "Power usage mode" is set to one of the modes including "Actual usage"?
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Antminer Z11 hashrates are reported as Mh/s instead of Kh/s on my awesome miner windows GUI. As a result daily payout looks like $10,000 per day instead of $10 per day. Anyone else have this issue?
I know that recent Z11 firmwares have some changes to the reported hashrate unit.

Could you please send me the API report (toolbar: Tools -> API Report) for this miner via PM? Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Then there is another secondary problem.

The auto profit does it according to the benchmark profile or to save the Hash.

But of course in my profile it puts 8.22 in cucka31, but in the day it does not even reach 7, but it does not change the currency because what it sends is the saved hash, not the hash that is being produced.

That is the important thing to be able to have a better solution for the temperatures, because it is not only the fact that it yields less, but also that it is more serious because the auto switch does not look at real parameters (impossible for X16r for example), but I want you to understand that problem

A Rig produces X power in a Something, but when that Rig in summer by temperature yields 20% less, it does not take it into account. Somehow the programming of the auto switch should know if that rig has 1 or several cards of reduced core or power, and automatically apply to the hash saved a transparent reduction, so as to better guess with the hash changes produced by the heat. It would be something to keep in mind. It is clear that if 1 or more cards are in the limit of temperature, low pontencia and the hash they get is not the one that is saved as a reference, but knowingly, you can apply a transparent reduction to that hash when one or more cards are in maximum temperature, because they will not be producing their maximum. I hope you understand what I mean.

Right now the auto profit with the function of maximum temperature lowering the core and dropping the hash, is not realistic in its changes, and keeps me in currencies that are not the most profitable at that moment because of the heat.
Awesome Miner is currently only measuring the hashrate and power usage based on the clocking you had when you do the benchmark. In this case you have taken care of the temperature by lowering the performance, and at this point the previously benchmarked hashrate and power usage is no longer fully correct. I do understand your point here - that you may not be able to reach this level of hashrate and power usage due to high temperatures.

I don't think there is any easy solution to this as Awesome Miner would have to be quite smart about finding out this automatically without making any mistakes.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hello Patrike, I have more suggestions on temperature control, and problems.

I have suggested a double OC, but it would be too much, I suppose, for 4 months of heat, that is, 1/3 of the year.

I am using the maximum temperature in OCs, but it has a big problem. If I put a generous OC, many cards reach the limit and start falling from Core, and as a result the rig yields much less because when you lower the core, it yields less, much less. Only at night goes well when temperatures drop.

If I put a very smooth OC, I will not reach those temperatures day or night, but it would also be producing less hash.

Lowering the core is very effective but produces a too strong drop in the hash, so my suggestion is:

You can do the same but instead of downloading the core in real time, whatever you reduce is the TDP or power of the source to that card. That also reduces the temperature but does not produce such a strong hash drop. In fact, it can produce more because it does not heat up and the core is not lowered. Or a combined system, that lowers a bit of core and a little power or TPD from the source.

A real example, the same night rig Cucka31 8.22 mhs, day 6.2 mhs. If I put a soft OC so that neither day nor night comes, I would stay at about 6.7 -6.9 mhs

That's why I asked for double oc, but I think that a system that drops the Power to each card by independent in steps of 5, would be fine.

What is 80 power 90 core, 500 memory. Well I get down to 75 90 500, that is not enough I would lower 70 90 500. The lowering of electric power, does not drop the hash as much. But the same as the core, card by card. I do not know if you can, if you can please you can add it as an option in the OC.

And it is impossible to have a single CB that serves both the day and the night without losing hash.
This is an interesting concept.

If it's only a single parameter like the "Power Limit" it should be possible for Awesome Miner to figure out what to do with it to reach some target power usage. The challenge with only a target power usage is that it's different depending on the GPU.

What about defining some offset? Like during certain hours (night time) Awesome Miner should take your power limit and reduce it by 10% for all profiles for example? That would work even with mixed GPU's and will not require so much work for you to configure even if you have many clocking profiles.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
I find that many a times on diff miners, the awesome miner fails to extract the folder and is stuck extracting the files in download.
Do i need to run as admin or something? This is new and i havent had this issue before.
If you run into a problem where the mining software isn't extracted correctly:

1) Please check if the downloaded zip-file for the mining software is valid or corrupt - this could be valuable information to know
2) Please collect the Remote Agent log file for when this happend and send the information to me. I can then review the scenario.

Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0

Anayone seen the "coin prices" on bottom of program ?
For me all are ok.. changing live, except for BTC witch was rising .. now it still shows 10.968,50 € whitch is wrong price..
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Hi patric, I have started to use remote GPU rig (not local network) on windows10pro, but main AW window not show power usage for this rig and of course calculate wrong total profit.
If i go to GPU tab in AW for this rig, i see power usage for every GPU in this rig.
I have asics which is controled from the same AW instance in local network and power usage control/profit calculation works right.
In my config asics and gpu placed in different miner groups.
pls help....

Are you using VPN ?? for me it works fine if all rigs are on the same VPN as AwesomeMiner computer.
legendary
Activity: 1754
Merit: 1007
Hi patric, I have started to use remote GPU rig (not local network) on windows10pro, but main AW window not show power usage for this rig and of course calculate wrong total profit.
If i go to GPU tab in AW for this rig, i see power usage for every GPU in this rig.
I have asics which is controled from the same AW instance in local network and power usage control/profit calculation works right.
In my config asics and gpu placed in different miner groups.
pls help....
jr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 2
OFF topic --- Someone knows of a technician in Europe to be able to send you two graphic cards, a 1070 and a 1080ti to repair. You have to be a good technician because here in Spain everyone does reballing and that is not the problem.

I ask here being off topic, because we are all miners and with many cards, surely someone knows someone who fixes the Nvidia. and it has to be in Europe for the shipping cost.

Thank you.

newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 9
Antminer Z11 hashrates are reported as Mh/s instead of Kh/s on my awesome miner windows GUI. As a result daily payout looks like $10,000 per day instead of $10 per day. Anyone else have this issue?
jr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 2
Could someone tell me what is the most accurate statistic provider ?
For a same coin (aeternity for example), i have a big difference between cointomine and coincalculator. Which one would the right one ?

I'm more advanced in that, I usually get the difficulty and hashnet of the same explorer of each currency, and if I can not because some explorer are complicated, the apis of some Exchanges, this could also add patrike, and if not, then before that no calculator would use the Whattomine data. But whenever you can use the explorer data

For Eaternety:

Difficulty: https://whattomine.com/coins/297.json
query: difficulty

Hashnet: https://whattomine.com/coins/297.json
query nethash

For price:
https://www.binance.com/api/v3/ticker/bookTicker
query: [? (@. symbol == 'AEBTC')]. bidPrice

in this case this currency has an explorer that does not give api, so the most reliable I found was WTM, remember to customize the currency, put reward and lock time
I think it rewards 368 and lock time 180

And choose the formula that is not exponential.

The problem of Aeternety, are two: one that pay once a day in almost all pools, and the second that most exchanges can only sell a minimum. With which from mine until you sell can spend 1 or 2 days or more.

With those data, then you must put the profit at 0.90 because I already did the test. And with all this you will always be close to the price, with difficulty and hashnet almost in real time, but WTM is in this case the one that best gives the data for lack of a better place.
jr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 2
Then there is another secondary problem.

The auto profit does it according to the benchmark profile or to save the Hash.

But of course in my profile it puts 8.22 in cucka31, but in the day it does not even reach 7, but it does not change the currency because what it sends is the saved hash, not the hash that is being produced.

That is the important thing to be able to have a better solution for the temperatures, because it is not only the fact that it yields less, but also that it is more serious because the auto switch does not look at real parameters (impossible for X16r for example), but I want you to understand that problem

A Rig produces X power in a Something, but when that Rig in summer by temperature yields 20% less, it does not take it into account. Somehow the programming of the auto switch should know if that rig has 1 or several cards of reduced core or power, and automatically apply to the hash saved a transparent reduction, so as to better guess with the hash changes produced by the heat. It would be something to keep in mind. It is clear that if 1 or more cards are in the limit of temperature, low pontencia and the hash they get is not the one that is saved as a reference, but knowingly, you can apply a transparent reduction to that hash when one or more cards are in maximum temperature, because they will not be producing their maximum. I hope you understand what I mean.

Right now the auto profit with the function of maximum temperature lowering the core and dropping the hash, is not realistic in its changes, and keeps me in currencies that are not the most profitable at that moment because of the heat.
newbie
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
Could someone tell me what is the most accurate statistic provider ?
For a same coin (aeternity for example), i have a big difference between cointomine and coincalculator. Which one would the right one ?
jr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 2
Hello Patrike, I have more suggestions on temperature control, and problems.

I have suggested a double OC, but it would be too much, I suppose, for 4 months of heat, that is, 1/3 of the year.

I am using the maximum temperature in OCs, but it has a big problem. If I put a generous OC, many cards reach the limit and start falling from Core, and as a result the rig yields much less because when you lower the core, it yields less, much less. Only at night goes well when temperatures drop.

If I put a very smooth OC, I will not reach those temperatures day or night, but it would also be producing less hash.

Lowering the core is very effective but produces a too strong drop in the hash, so my suggestion is:

You can do the same but instead of downloading the core in real time, whatever you reduce is the TDP or power of the source to that card. That also reduces the temperature but does not produce such a strong hash drop. In fact, it can produce more because it does not heat up and the core is not lowered. Or a combined system, that lowers a bit of core and a little power or TPD from the source.

A real example, the same night rig Cucka31 8.22 mhs, day 6.2 mhs. If I put a soft OC so that neither day nor night comes, I would stay at about 6.7 -6.9 mhs

That's why I asked for double oc, but I think that a system that drops the Power to each card by independent in steps of 5, would be fine.

What is 80 power 90 core, 500 memory. Well I get down to 75 90 500, that is not enough I would lower 70 90 500. The lowering of electric power, does not drop the hash as much. But the same as the core, card by card. I do not know if you can, if you can please you can add it as an option in the OC.

And it is impossible to have a single CB that serves both the day and the night without losing hash.
member
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
Hey, is there a custom progress field for miner uptime instead of windows uptime?
Please use the following:

Code:
"Mining Uptime: " + string.Format("{0}d {1}h {2}m", TimeSpan.FromSeconds(status.SecondsSinceStart).Days, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(status.SecondsSinceStart).Hours, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(status.SecondsSinceStart).Minutes)
Thank you.

I find that many a times on diff miners, the awesome miner fails to extract the folder and is stuck extracting the files in download.
Do i need to run as admin or something? This is new and i havent had this issue before.
member
Activity: 277
Merit: 23
- Access to mining software command line help via the context menu for a miner

this field is grey-out, I guess this is an option to send commands in console right?  
This feature is currently only available when the mining software isn't running. It's not intended for sending commands to the console - it's a way to bring up the help (output from the command --help) from the mining software.

I guess most of use already researched the help/config on miner prior to installing....maybe for new miners its useful

kudos on RDP 
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
- Access to mining software command line help via the context menu for a miner

this field is grey-out, I guess this is an option to send commands in console right?  
This feature is currently only available when the mining software isn't running. It's not intended for sending commands to the console - it's a way to bring up the help (output from the command --help) from the mining software.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hey, is there a custom progress field for miner uptime instead of windows uptime?
Please use the following:

Code:
"Mining Uptime: " + string.Format("{0}d {1}h {2}m", TimeSpan.FromSeconds(status.SecondsSinceStart).Days, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(status.SecondsSinceStart).Hours, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(status.SecondsSinceStart).Minutes)
member
Activity: 277
Merit: 23
- Access to mining software command line help via the context menu for a miner

this field is grey-out, I guess this is an option to send commands in console right? 
member
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
Hey, is there a custom progress field for miner uptime instead of windows uptime?
Jump to: