Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 309. (Read 703148 times)

I will ignore those people who do not contribute and have a strong and arrogant attitude.

I do not spam, I try to explain the problems as well as possible, because a programmer who can not reproduce it can not fix it. Now for your explanations I see that it is a problem of the shared port of yiimp, but I would like it more than the programmer told me, since it is not in the documentation.

And yes, I have called some incompetent programmer, but it has not been exactly here, it has been in other forums of another program and the programmer was very bad, he fixed one thing and broke 20 more. That one is a programmer does not mean that it is GOOD, it is only a programmer, and within them there are bad and good ones. That forum did not enter or use your program, and if I said bad, it is because it deserved it, you have to be honest, if it bothers you, it's your problem.

And when you pay for software like this and you see various failures, it communicates them. For now I have no problems here with the person that interests me, who is the programmer, I only have them with some people who are very smart and go calling fools to others.

If you are not interested in my posts, just ignore me and everyone happy, I do not need your moral advice. I will continue writing as I am doing.

It is clear that if I see failure, I communicate, if something is not documented and I need to know, I ask, and if I post a lot, it is because I am all day with this program, which for now has not exceeded my expectations, but we all know that It's a bit peculiar, and that does not mean it's bad, I do not want to be misunderstood, it seems to me good software, with its problems, like everyone else, but with a lot of documentation.

Nor do I see many reporting problems and even less bothering to send videos. Other reports of mine have been errors that have been corrected for the good of the entire community. It seems that even if you do not like my attitude, you are a beneficiary of what is fixed due to my reports or suggestions that the programmer is free to do or not, but nobody can tell me not to suggest possible functions.

IF you are angry with the world, do not be angry with me that I am not guilty of anything in your life.

With your permission, I'm going to ignore you, I'm not interested in that kind of poisoned opinion.

First thank you for your comment.

Seriously we have that limitation?

I understand, the port is the same, but I choose currency with -p c = COIN.

WTM, CC or Coinwarz gives me the price and knows which currency to hit, you just have to choose the right pool.

When I do the test separately, that is, choosing the coin alone, I do not have a single problem and it measures me correctly. I do not understand then, if for example if WTM says that mine MBC, it will choose the pool that I have defined for MBC, and not that of V-I-V-O or Qbic that I have in the same pool.

The price takes it from one site and mine in another, I do not know why it should interfere. phi-phi-pool is one of the most stable pools that I know of when it really gives what it estimates, I do not know why AW is wrong.

There will be no alternative, right?

I know that when I go against a protocol and port, mine the most profitable coins and convert it to the one I want through -p c = COIN.

The one that decides which currency is WTM, CC etc ... I do not understand the confusion of AW, with Zergpool I think it does not happen, but I do not like that pool, it takes weeks or months to pay you in the currency you request.

I understand

WTM trigger> choose my custom pool with the currency> mine that port and ask for that currency. where is the problem?

It's not the pool that tells me to mine, it's the three price pages and currency difficulties, that's why I do not understand that it fails.

I hope this has a solution. I hope that patrike can confirm it, to change or not change those pools, or wait for a solution.

And that's a general misconception that people think putting c=XXX equals mining certain coin which it doesn't, nor does the inhouse mc parameters used by several pools works. that c=XXX is only to link your address so pool pays you in XXX coin after conversion. it's just maths.

Feel free to put more ppl on the ignore list, because their answer isn't what you wanted to hear. I'm sure you are on a good number of people's ignore list than average user of this forum. Keep the insults (to other users, to developers...etc) up and no one is willing to lend any help, that would suit you.

Also don't spam the thread with "Artificially Induced" problems and call out devs for incompetence. Mr. PICNIC.

-------
Another clue, it only happens to me with phi-phi-pool groups, I say this to give data, I have added 3 coins followed by that pool and the problems have started.

The last one added MBC equal, and Qbic the same. When Zcore, which is the first one in the switch list, is there, it is also in phi-phi-pool.net, there could be a problem in the programming. What I know is that it is not normal.

in phi-phi-pool mine to the something, but then you add in advanced -p c = MBC or the currency to extract, I do not know if there will be any problem with that pool and AW.

I try to reproduce the problem
NOTE that useful is to ignore users, I know that person has written but I do not see the post. Better.

Problem you are seeing here is easy, you are mining specific coins on Yiimp shared port, the Yiimp profitability figures overrides the one provided by coin profitability providers such as WTM, CC etc.

If you see the blocks you are hitting, you are surely not only hitting VIVO blocks but any neoscrypt coins that sent you work and hit a block, you'd get a share in your last ## earnings not only limited to VIVO.

I have just defined another multipool, where I have chosen less coins, but among them V-I-V-O (I put it with scripts or translates it badly), and in the second pool with fewer activated coins it seems to be fine

There is a limit of manual currencies activated at the same time ??, are there problems with cryptodredge? because you have already seen how it changed currency without restarting.

I hope it helps to identify the problem and can be fixed, or to inform me if there is a limit of selected coins. I do not understand that behavior that I have shown in the videos.

After a while I went back to pool 1, and everything goes well again.

At first glance it seems to be some cache not synchronized in the programming. If you can manage 10,000 miners, on some programming side you will have cached parts to avoid too many calls to the database.

Another explanation I can not find. What you have seen in the videos has now disappeared, so I think about some cache.

In pool1 I have 37 groups selected, in pool2 of tests select 17. I went to pool2 and everything was right, after a while I returned to pool1 without changing anything, and everything fixed.

I know it is a very confusing error, I have explained it to him and I have shown it to him in video. Before I intuited it, but today I have seen it completely, and it is usually of a random nature.

Maybe my time of 2 min is less than some cache. I check statistics every 9 minutes.

------ 1 hour later
I just happened, by adding another new currency MBC also neoscrypt. Without being the most profitable, all the rigs have gone to undermine it ...... V-I-V-O also happened to me after adding it and activating it in the pool. I mention it in case it helps to find the problem.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/luv2z2dy2dt84j9/IMG_2293.MOV?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t47s9z696szgqr1/IMG_2292.MOV?dl=0
please see the full videos.

Well, I have another problem. Some days ago I thought I saw something strange, but today I have been much more attentive and I have seen the problem.

The swtich auto does not work correctly at least using cryptodredge mostly for neoscrypt. Sometimes it hits, sometimes it does not go to a currency of lesser value.

I have left you a video where you will see that I have a pool with many coins added by hand, in view details it tells me that I should switch to zcore or xzx, but it goes to V-I-V-O that yields much less. Apart from that it is in auto profit, and everything is correct, other things that are not seen, would be that I get the price in CURRENT, I do not use the average of 24 hours, although I have also tried it.

Suddenly in this case today is "V-I-V-O", although it is not profitable right now, is chosen by the autoprofit, when seen in the video that is not even among the first, nor respects Zcore that would be the first option of AutoSwitch

This today I realized in a big way, but I was already suspecting it from days ago. It is as if sometimes it gets stuck or frozen in a coin for no apparent reason. After a few hours he has a more normal behavior

That is, there are some problems in the Auto Switch, and you have already seen that in view details, there are many other currencies above live to be switched to undermine, but the program has given you to undermine V-I-V-O. Another day is another currency. And V-I-V-O has a modified profit of 0.95, so there is not much difference to profit 1.

But I can not say, but if the swtich auto module does not work well, it will be impossible to get money out of this program. In many of the updates you do, you comment that you correct the swtich car a lot, it is as if there was a problem known to you that you still do not finish dominating.

Now what do I do if suddenly the autoswtich does not work well? And this happens frequently with other currencies.

I have looked at all the options, it is in pool with more than 80 coins activated, the auto switch shows that other coins would be chosen, I have restarted the computer and I have looked until the last option. It is as if there was some type of cache that does not get deleted and stays stuck on a coin, or does not read the auto switch list correctly.

It is perfectly how the program works, as well as to know that it does not work well. That's why my results for now have been small compared to NEMOS, when before I had fewer cards.

The auto switch selector is not being reliable, but I do not know which is the trigger that makes it work badly. Maybe you have a lot of coins and can not handle them?

All this happens with the cryptodredge miner, I do not know if it will be the culprit. But I'm going crazy. Look at how it magically changes currency and profit, without cutting the miner and keeping time. This is wrong, either that or my installation of the program has gone crazy.

Awesome Miner only shows these configuration sections for the predefined SRBminer. I will make the change to also show these sections if you add your own user defined miner that is based on SRBminer. Thanks for pointing this out.

Right now Awesome Miner is only adding parameters based on the algorithm, and not on a specific coin. With the introduction of all Equihash variants this might have to change - so I do understand your point here. It will probably not be in the next version already, but I will try to find a good way of supporting this. Thanks for your feedback!

Your observation about --algo flag not being able to be overridden is correct. I will make that possible in the next release.

With a recent version of Awesome Miner, it already supports adding --algo 8 for Cryptonight-Fast.

Those calculations should be correct for all coins except some Equihash and Cryptonight coins. If you use these values for something like BTC, LTC, Dash or almost any other coin, you will get $0.00016 per day.

This one is included since a few versions ago. Please check if it's made visible in the Options dialog, Algorithms section.

Right now there is no resend feature for outgoing mail.

It sounds like the Windows system have some strange behaviors here. Are you running any security software that causes these issues?

Awesome Miner is not using the same folder for upgrades as for the configuration file. If the user roaming folder where the configuration file is located is set to read-only, Awesome Miner will run into issues saving the configuration.

If you have a specific time where you think Awesome Miner did something wrong, please send me the log file by mail and indicate the time of the issue.

On some systems, you need to update the MSI Afterburner Remote Server dll-file according to the instructions in the section "Updated Remote Server DLL-file" at the bottom of this page:
http://www.awesomeminer.com/help/gpuclocking.aspx

Is it that you have two Awesome Miner main applications running, both connected to the same Remote Agent? Are there three computers involved here, a mining rig, your laptop and your desktop PC? What's installed in terms of Awesome Miner main application and Remote Agent on each of these?

You are a life saver, adding Content-Type to the request header sorted it out.
For those using curl or PHP:
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, array('Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded'));

Here is my completed code, now my wife can use her PC with out having to worry about stopping the miner. (She has 2x 10080tis in her rig)
https://pastebin.com/30c9LKdj

Ugh...   I'm not going to get into this.  I've insulted no one, even when I'm right.  When I'm wrong, I certainly admit it.  Good luck with your experiments.  I suspect that when you get some more mining experience, you will understand what I'm trying to convey.



Good luck... some day you will realize that profit switching is a game that you cannot win.



Have fun.  If you care to comment once more... please quote me where I insulted you?

I applaud your efforts, but you are talking about the difference of pennies or cents.  Isn't your time worth more?



Your first problem is that you are profit switching.  For many reasons... I've stated them numerous times on this thread.. chasing a hot coin is not worth the effort.  You simply do not earn more by attempting to profit switch on services like zpool.  And when you have your profit switching interval set too low like the one minute you have you are not earning more.  You are spending more time switching than mining.



There are many factors you cannot control.  For one, network latency is not a static variable, as it will constantly change.  Hashrate is not a static variable, as it will constantly change.  Network hashrate and difficulty is not a static variale, as it will constantly change.  Exchange rates are not a static variable, as it will constantly change.  Different coins have different maturity rates.  Pool operators have different algorithms for getting coins to exchanges, Low volume coins sell at different rates, and dumps affect exchange rates.  Temporary pumps any serve to have you chase a coin that will not be worth what you think it will be when it's finally been exchanged to bitcoin and sent back to you.

I just bothered to read all your comments in bitcointalk. You always want to be right, and even to insult people calling her silly for using the term ROI which is also very valid.

In all the post you end up arguing because you are intransigent, and for what you have shown me in AW, a total ignorant of the practice, but if you know the theory.

That said and for the good of the forum, I will not answer any comments. If you are looking for a fight, look for it in another post. To others, who see their message history and see that he is an unpleasant person who only knows how to talk and always wants to be right, it does not matter what post you read. He is very smart and the others are very stupid

If your life sucks, do not infect me. Here ends my conversation with you and your super intellect, and I will ignore you.